Brits introducing gay lifestyle to children as young as 4

[Amby 490]

Index of Homophobia omg

I'm in the process of getting a copy of the test and scale

[^_^ 5,021]

I'm in the process of getting a copy of the test and scale

Some of the pages on the PDF link you posted aren't clear. See if you can find data on how much the circumferences increased for each of the two population sets when viewing all three forms of porn.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Some of the pages on the PDF link you posted aren't clear. See if you can find data on how much the circumferences increased for each of the two population sets when viewing all three forms of porn.

Are you worried about the #######?

[^_^ 5,021]

Are you worried about the #######?

No, but it might be interesting given the theories of how sexuality is actually a spectrum.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

No, but it might be interesting given the theories of how sexuality is actually a spectrum.

Well, if you like watching straight hardcore porn, you must be at least little gay.

[^_^ 5,021]

Well, if you like watching straight hardcore porn, you must be at least little gay.

I always did wonder why the "MILFs like it big" and "Teens like it big" series were so popular.

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

I always did wonder why the "MILFs like it big" and "Teens like it big" series were so popular.

I assumed it was because you were singlehandedly* propping up the "Like It Big" series through repeated purchases.

*The other hand, of course, needed to be free.**

**For the remote, of course.

[Amby 490]

Some of the pages on the PDF link you posted aren't clear. See if you can find data on how much the circumferences increased for each of the two population sets when viewing all three forms of porn.

I will copy and paste from the actual journal article in a bit. I can link to it but it will only you show an abstract unless you have access to the database.

[^_^ 5,021]

I assumed it was because you were singlehandedly* propping up the "Like It Big" series through repeated purchases.

*The other hand, of course, needed to be free.**

**For the remote, of course.

I watch free clips. Don't pay a dime. And I skip over the like it big clips, not a big fan of a movie that focuses on a ####### for up to 120 seconds without a single shot of titty.

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

I watch free clips. Don't pay a dime. And I skip over the like it big clips, not a big fan of a movie that focuses on a ####### for up to 120 seconds without a single shot of titty.

Are you sure it's not because you fear the #######? And do you just love boobs because you have some sort of Oedipal vestige of desire for a maternal breast?

I'm just asking.

[^_^ 5,021]

Are you sure it's not because you fear the #######? And do you just love boobs because you have some sort of Oedipal vestige of desire for a maternal breast?

I'm just asking.

Boobs are therapy.

[Amby 490]

In order to evaluate this impression, we conducted ANOVAs

of Groups X Time Blocks for each stimulus type. For the heterosexual

and lesbian videos, only time blocks were significant,

indicating increases in penile engorgement over time blocks,

F(5, 310)= 115.321,p<.001, andF(5, 310) = 64.878,p<

.001, respectively. There were no significant main effects of

groups or an interaction with these two videos, indicating that

both groups showed significant engorgement to these videos.

For the male homosexual video, there was a significant main

effect of groups, time blocks, and their interaction: F( 1, 62) =

6.14, p < .05; F(5, 310)= 19.04, p < .001; and F(5, 310) =

5.14, p < .001, respectively. These results indicate that the homophobic

men showed a significant increase in penile circum

ference to the male homosexual video but that the control men

did not. An analysis of the simple effects of this interaction with

pairwise Tukey tests indicate that the groups were significantly

different at time blocks 4, 5, and 6 (p < .01).

Another way of evaluating these data is to calculate the percentage

of men who demonstrated no significant tumescence

(i.e., 0-6 mm), modest tumescence (i.e., > 6-12 mm), and

definite tumescence (i.e., > 12 mm) based on their mean tumescence

score to the homosexual video. In the homophobic

group, 20% showed no significant tumescence, 26% showed

moderate tumescence, and 54% showed definite tumescence to

the homosexual video; the corresponding percentages in the

nonhomophobic group were 66%, 10%, and 24%, respectively.

Figure 1. Stimulus presentations by groups across time blocks. The

only significant difference between groups is with the homosexual video.

The blocked line represents the nonhomophobic group; the solid line

represents the homophobic group. Top: Heterosexual video; middle: lesbian

video; bottom: homosexual video.[/quote]

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Boobs are therapy.

Big boobs remind me too much of my mother, and that would be just plain wrong in my mind. I guess I have an Oedipal phobia.

[The_Dude 1,142]

I watch free clips. Don't pay a dime. And I skip over the like it big clips, not a big fan of a movie that focuses on a ####### for up to 120 seconds without a single shot of titty.

You sound like a connoisseur. Do you have some sort of ratio of penises to tits that is allowable and not?

Big boobs remind me too much of my mother, and that would be just plain wrong in my mind. I guess I have an Oedipal phobia.

Please do not elaborate on that thought.Ever.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Please do not elaborate on that thought.Ever.

Real scary, huh?