CALLING THEM ISLAMIC FASCISTS CAN'T HELP

[Veiled Princess 1]

I'm only uninviting to those who

Not to step on any toes here but you don't have the authority to 'uninvite' anyone

carry on...

Dictionary.com

uninviting

–not inviting

Sadly you got the definition wrong. To be uninviting is to... not invite. Are you telling me I should invite everyone, #######?

To say that something is 'uninviting' means that thing itself is not inviting (appeasing, pleasing, appealing etc.). To uninvite someone (while not really a word and therefore not on dictionary.com) would mean that someone has been invited and you are revoking their invitation.

Allah is the only one to choose who will be 'uninvited'.

My brain hurts from the bad grammar sorry if I caused that for anyone else

[bhajishah 4]

why not call them roly poly fat boyzz instead???

[canuhandleit 0]

I'm only uninviting to those who

Not to step on any toes here but you don't have the authority to 'uninvite' anyone

carry on...

Dictionary.com

uninviting

–not inviting

Sadly you got the definition wrong. To be uninviting is to... not invite. Are you telling me I should invite everyone, #######?

To say that something is 'uninviting' means that thing itself is not inviting (appeasing, pleasing, appealing etc.). To uninvite someone (while not really a word and therefore not on dictionary.com) would mean that someone has been invited and you are revoking their invitation.

Allah is the only one to choose who will be 'uninvited'.

My brain hurts from the bad grammar sorry if I caused that for anyone else

The word can be used in more than one context, FYI.

You still don't get it?

Dictionary.com

uninviting

–not inviting

Sadly you got the definition wrong. To be uninviting is to... not invite. Are you telling me I should invite everyone, #######?

Edited September 6, 2006 by canuhandleit

[Veiled Princess 1]

I'm only uninviting to those who

Not to step on any toes here but you don't have the authority to 'uninvite' anyone

carry on...

Dictionary.com

uninviting

–not inviting

Sadly you got the definition wrong. To be uninviting is to... not invite. Are you telling me I should invite everyone, #######?

To say that something is 'uninviting' means that thing itself is not inviting (appeasing, pleasing, appealing etc.). To uninvite someone (while not really a word and therefore not on dictionary.com) would mean that someone has been invited and you are revoking their invitation.

Allah is the only one to choose who will be 'uninvited'.

My brain hurts from the bad grammar sorry if I caused that for anyone else

The word can be used in more than one context, FYI.

You still don't get it?

Dictionary.com

uninviting

–not inviting

Sadly you got the definition wrong. To be uninviting is to... not invite. Are you telling me I should invite everyone, #######?

Nope, just explaining English to ya.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Deleted

Edited September 6, 2006 by erekose

[Scott & Lai 12]

I'm only uninviting to those who

Not to step on any toes here but you don't have the authority to 'uninvite' anyone

carry on...

Dictionary.com

uninviting

–not inviting

Sadly you got the definition wrong. To be uninviting is to... not invite. Are you telling me I should invite everyone, #######?

To say that something is 'uninviting' means that thing itself is not inviting (appeasing, pleasing, appealing etc.). To uninvite someone (while not really a word and therefore not on dictionary.com) would mean that someone has been invited and you are revoking their invitation.

Allah is the only one to choose who will be 'uninvited'.

My brain hurts from the bad grammar sorry if I caused that for anyone else

Actually, disinvite = "to withdraw an invitation." If you are uninvited, you were never invited or welcome in the first place.

[canuhandleit 0]

I'm only uninviting to those who

Not to step on any toes here but you don't have the authority to 'uninvite' anyone

carry on...

Dictionary.com

uninviting

–not inviting

Sadly you got the definition wrong. To be uninviting is to... not invite. Are you telling me I should invite everyone, #######?

To say that something is 'uninviting' means that thing itself is not inviting (appeasing, pleasing, appealing etc.). To uninvite someone (while not really a word and therefore not on dictionary.com) would mean that someone has been invited and you are revoking their invitation.

Allah is the only one to choose who will be 'uninvited'.

My brain hurts from the bad grammar sorry if I caused that for anyone else

Actually, disinvite = "to withdraw an invitation." If you are uninvited, you were never invited or welcome in the first place.

damn veiled princess, i'd like to say... I told you so.

so... I TOLD YOU SO.

You might want to go back over middle school english over again.

Edited September 6, 2006 by canuhandleit

[iceyspots 0]

oh noes grammar naziz lol

[canuhandleit 0]

ha ^

[Heracles 417]

The fact is that not all muslims are terrorists, yet most of the terrorists are carrying out atrocities in the name of Islam. It's only natural that people will begin to hate and discriminate against a group who has members that are adamant about killing others..

Lets not sit here and make it out as if poor muslims are all innocent when history has proven otherwise. Lets not even begin to break down the ottoman era and so on.. Ok that was then this is now..

The fact is that even this very second there are muslim extremists plotting to kill Americans. So what should Americans do, just sit here and play fair and refrain for using profiling, so they can be attacked again??

This is why I was so proud of Serbia in the 90's. For once non-muslims had enough and went on the offensive attacking and killing muslims for their cause. So how did it feel being on the other end of the stick?? The warped brains of these current extremists believe that they are the only ones who can be vicious or barbaric. I believe that this is a major weakness of muslim extremists. It's about time non-muslim countries like Israel start going on the offensive. Maybe even implement a plan stating for every non-muslim a muslim kills we completely annihilate a muslim city. ###### using precision bombs. You guys throw a stone we return with a 1,000 rocks, period!

Iran wants a clash of civilizations, we'll give them a f##ken clash of civilizations alright..

Edited September 6, 2006 by Infidel

[GaryC 7]

[canuhandleit 0]

The fact is that not all muslims are terrorists, yet most of the terrorists are carrying out atrocities in the name of Islam. It's only natural that people will begin to hate and discriminate against a group who has members that are adamant about killing others..

Lets not sit here and make it out as if poor muslims are all innocent when history has proven otherwise. Lets not even begin to break down the ottoman era and so on.. Ok that was then this is now..

The fact is that even this very second there are muslim extremists plotting to kill Americans. So what should Americans do, just sit here and play fair and refrain for using profiling, so they can be attacked again??

This is why I was so proud of Serbia in the 90's. For once non-muslims had enough and went on the offensive attacking and killing muslims for their cause. So how did it feel being on the other end of the stick?? The warped brains of these current extremists believe that they are the only ones who can be vicious or barbaric. I believe that this is a major weakness of muslim extremists. It's about time non-muslim countries like Israel start going on the offensive. Maybe even implement a plan stating for every non-muslim a muslim kills we completely annihilate a muslim city. ###### using precision bombs. You guys throw a stone we return with a 1,000 rocks, period!

Iran wants a clash of civilizations, we'll give them a f##ken clash of civilizations alright..

Wait wait, hold on. By annihilating a Muslim City you might kill 2 million people... and chances are only maybe a hundred were even close to Muslim Extremeist and alot of them probably never did anything even if they were extremist. You would kill innocent lives and not care? Are you sure we should stoop down to their level and kill off innocent lives? Not only that, but following a percision bombing of Muslim Cities... it would be the start of a new world war... every single country would go crazy.

BTW, you act as if the history of Muslims was the worst ever. Take a step back and let's look into Christianity's history for a second... then get back to me. We don't even compare to how horrible they were.

You sound about 300 times stupider than George Bush at this point, I didn't even know if that was possible until I read what you wrote.

[Veiled Princess 1]

I'm only uninviting to those who

Not to step on any toes here but you don't have the authority to 'uninvite' anyone

carry on...

Dictionary.com

uninviting

–not inviting

Sadly you got the definition wrong. To be uninviting is to... not invite. Are you telling me I should invite everyone, #######?

To say that something is 'uninviting' means that thing itself is not inviting (appeasing, pleasing, appealing etc.). To uninvite someone (while not really a word and therefore not on dictionary.com) would mean that someone has been invited and you are revoking their invitation.

Allah is the only one to choose who will be 'uninvited'.

My brain hurts from the bad grammar sorry if I caused that for anyone else

Actually, disinvite = "to withdraw an invitation." If you are uninvited, you were never invited or welcome in the first place.

damn veiled princess, i'd like to say... I told you so.

so... I TOLD YOU SO.

You might want to go back over middle school english over again.

Please post some reference from an online dictionary source

[canuhandleit 0]

Diction-fuckin-ary.com

HTTP://WWW.DICTIONARY.COM

Go. Go. Go.

[canuhandleit 0]

Back on topic...

here's a question to ponder on...

Many US Army soldiers have tortured/caused harm to prisoners they have captured, is that not an act of terrorism?

Terrorism is defined as: The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.

(Dictionary.com)

You will argue that they are PRISONERS, but obviously high figures from Europe, other countries, and even our own country are denouncing any harsh treatment of prisoners or even people in Iraq.

I have a friend who has a friend that just returned from Iraq. You wouldn't guess what the soldier and his soldier buddies did "FOR FUN." They basically killed off about 6 children playing together minding their own business from far away for fun... practicing their aim. Not only that, but the video includes the soldiers LAUGHING it off. What kind of sick ####### would do such a thing and on top of that record it? Hopefully he's in the right hands now, I told my friend to report him although i'm not sure if he did. Now, that... seems like terrorism to me (and not toward prisoners, toward innocent lives).

WHY are our soldiers stooping down to a terrorists' level? Why are they performing acts of terrorism and getting away with it? (only a few have been caught!)

This is my home country too and i'm in shame of some of the things our soldiers do in Iraq...

Edited September 6, 2006 by canuhandleit