DADT is DEAD!

[Peikko 1,575]

well, the argument does 'fit' somewhat as most child molestors are men going after little boys than little girls.... *shrugs* It is absurd to equate the two as one in the same though.

Repeal prop 8 though and set an example? Where courts rule more than the people? Stalin and Hitler would be proud.

You're right, gay people do raise families. A study recently came out also that showed gay parents seem to breed gay children more often.... That can't be healthy for society either...

Don't get me wrong. I play devils advocate on this issue. I don't care what the hell people do and I think DADT is about as stupid as the repeal of it is. i/e - it's IRRELEVENT... The military like anything else is your JOB. I don't care if your straight, gay, animal lover, etc... your sexuality is completely not relevent to the position you're in.

Most child molesters are NOT men going after little boys. Most sexual assault has always been and continues to be men raping and abusing girls and women.

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

Most child molesters are NOT men going after little boys. Most sexual assault has always been and continues to be men raping and abusing girls and women.

Does your statistics include gay scout leaders ?

[Ban Hammer 13,475]

Does your statistics include gay scout leaders ?

we used to have one of those working here - he's currently serving about 5 years for child porn.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

Does your statistics include gay scout leaders ?

Dated but a stat:

• 1-3 Girls and 1-7 Boys under the age of 18 ors are sexually abused.

-1989 Report presented for Fed. Parliament (RCMP) Jaclyn Mace @ Statistics Canada

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Dated but a stat:

• 1-3 Girls and 1-7 Boys under the age of 18 ors are sexually abused.

-1989 Report presented for Fed. Parliament (RCMP) Jaclyn Mace @ Statistics Canada

But, who are doing the molesting? And on whom? Those would be interesting statistics, even for Canada.

[Danno 1,228]

Dated but a stat:

• 1-3 Girls and 1-7 Boys under the age of 18 ors are sexually abused.

-1989 Report presented for Fed. Parliament (RCMP) Jaclyn Mace @ Statistics Canada

SO many abused boys and yet gay males are only 3% of the population.

Actually I have read recent stats which show boys are abused much more, than previously thought.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

SO many abused boys and yet gay males are only 3% of the population.

Actually I have read recent stats which show boys are abused much more, than previously thought.

Must be all those hot, frustrated, female teachers and babysitters doing all the abusing then. What red blooded teenage male is going to report that?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Trying to link homosexuality to child sex offenders is outrageous imo. No doubt paul has cooked up some outlandish theory to justify it.

Regardless, it is BS.

[Obama 2012 1,714]

nvm.... you're so not worth it.

Edited December 20, 2010 by Paul and Vanessa

[The_Dude 1,142]

SO many abused boys and yet gay males are only 3% of the population.

Actually I have read recent stats which show boys are abused much more, than previously thought.

Only you would try to draw such an asinine conclusion.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Neither is this worth it. The lengths people will go to to justify their own prejudices is frankly shameful and yes you should be ashamed to put gay people in the same category as child sex offenders.

Of course you aren't because you are an arrogant guy - having already tried to rationalise the mass murder of populations in war (amongst other things). And then to say your passion is social anthropology - you understand people about as well as Hannibal Lecter!

Edited December 20, 2010 by Ron Burgundy

[Obama 2012 1,714]

Neither is this worth it. The lengths people will go to to justify their own prejudices is frankly shameful and yes you should be ashamed to put gay people in the same category as child sex offenders.

Of course you aren't because you are an arrogant guy - having already tried to rationalise the mass murder of populations in war (amongst other things). And then to say your passion is social anthropology - you understand people about as well as Hannibal Lecter!

Perhaps you should RE-READ what I said. I know it's your nature to only see the negative things you don't like about what I post. Maybe you just have a "thing" for me, but I don't swing that way dude. So back off a bit.

Point being, if you'd get off your high horse, you'd see that I said it was ridiculous to equate the two... I bet you didn't even pay attention to that part though.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

If you're not equating the two, then why are you doing it?

[Obama 2012 1,714]

If you're not equating the two, then why are you doing it?

dude... read

well, the argument does 'fit' somewhat as most child molestors are men going after little boys than little girls.... *shrugs* It is absurd to equate the two as one in the same though.

Repeal prop 8 though and set an example? Where courts rule more than the people? Stalin and Hitler would be proud.

You're right, gay people do raise families. A study recently came out also that showed gay parents seem to breed gay children more often.... That can't be healthy for society either...

Don't get me wrong. I play devils advocate on this issue. I don't care what the hell people do and I think DADT is about as stupid as the repeal of it is. i/e - it's IRRELEVENT... The military like anything else is your JOB. I don't care if your straight, gay, animal lover, etc... your sexuality is completely not relevent to the position you're in.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Since when did "gay" only apply to men?

Incidentally by justifying Prop 8, you are suggesting that majority rule should be paramount, even when it is promoting something that clearly disadvantages a minority group in a way that runs counter to (supposedly) what the US stands for. The fact is, it has become more socially acceptable to be prejudiced against gays than it is against racial minorities.

And yes - I fully expect that a slew of hyperbolic analogies will follow about dog fvckers and polyamorous types for this too. As you said, don't bother - it's not worth it.