Assange lawyer condemns calls for assassination of WikiLeaks' founder

[spookyturtle 9,465]

A lawyer for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange on Thursday condemned calls for his assassination as "absolutely outrageous and indeed illegal" and claimed remarks by Sarah Palin may prevent him from getting a fair trial in the United States.

Jennifer Robinson, of London law firm Finers Stephen Innocent, spoke out as pressure mounted on the whistle-blowing organization and Assange himself.

The U.S. authorities chased WikiLeaks from an American commercial computer network, Amazon.com, and temporarily stopped the leak of embarrassing diplomatic documents, apparently aided by freelance computer hackers.

But within hours the website was back online, publishing from a fortified bunker in Sweden.

The virtual chase was mirrored by a real-life pursuit as a Swedish court refused to allow him to appeal against an arrest warrant.

In a statement given to NBC News, the Swedish Prosecution Office said Assange had been "detained in his absence, charged with rape, sexual molestation and illegal coercion."

Undeterred by this and American attempts to silence WikiLeaks, the 39-year-old Australian continued releasing confidential government documents.

Some showed how the Obama administration and Congress helped persuade Spain not to pursue charges against members of George W. Bush's administration for allowing torture of terrorism suspects.

Meantime, criticism of Assange has mounted. Tom Flanagan, a former aide to the Canadian prime minister, has called for Assange's assassination, while former Alaska governor Palin said he was an "anti-American operative with blood on his hands" in a Facebook message Monday.

Mike Huckabee, like Palin a potential Republican presidential candidate, also said the person who leaked the information to Assange should be tried for treason and executed.

Prosecute over assassination calls

Speaking to Pacifica Radio Thursday, Robinson said Assange was in the U.K. but said she could not confirm his "exact whereabouts" because of fears for his safety.

"These calls for his assassination are absolutely outrageous and indeed illegal. I think that the prosecuting authorities ought to consider prosecuting these individuals for incitement to violence," Robinson told the radio station. "We take these concerns very seriously."

She said reports he was trying to evade arrest were "absolutely inaccurate."

"One can imagine that when you have very public officials making these sorts of very serious calls for assassination that one would be concerned for their personal safety," Robinson told the Pacifica. "I also think that it raises genuine concerns when you have Sarah Palin making such allegations for the prospect of my client receiving any sort of due process in the US."

She added they would be seeking advice from U.S. lawyers about the U.S. Espionage Act, saying a possible prosecution there was "of grave concern."

"In our view, WikiLeaks ought to be entitled to First Amendment protections for free speech. And any prosecution under the Espionage Act would call into question these protections," Robinson said.

In her Facebook message, Palin said Assange was not a journalist "any more than the 'editor' of al Qaeda’s new English-language magazine Inspire is a 'journalist.'"

"His past posting of classified documents revealed the identity of more than 100 Afghan sources to the Taliban. Why was he not pursued with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders?" Palin said.

She also questioned why WikiLeaks staff shouldn't have their assets frozen "just as we do to individuals who provide material support for terrorist organizations?" and why "cyber tools" had not been used to disable WikiLeaks permanently.

U.K. asks Sweden for more details

Also Thursday, Sweden's highest court announced it had refused permission to Assange to appeal against the arrest order.

Assange has denied the allegations, which were made earlier this year after he visited the Nordic state. His lawyer lodged an appeal against the arrest order at the High Court this week but the court has now refused to consider the case.

"The High Court has not granted a leave to appeal, so the Svea Court of Appeals ruling still stands," High Court official Kerstin Norman told Reuters.

Noting the court's decision not to allow him to appeal, the Swedish Prosecution Office said in a statement that British police had asked for more information about the case regarding "the penalties for the other crimes, in addition to rape, that Julian Assange was arrested for."

"This information will be supplied immediately. The previous arrest warrant stands," the statement added.

Swedish Prosecution Office spokeswoman Helena Ekstrand also said the office had not received any information as to the location of Assange. "So the situation now is that the arrest warrant still stands and we are looking for Julian Assange," she said.

Mark Stephens, from the same law firm as Robinson, earlier complained Assange had yet to receive formal notice of the allegations he faces — something Stephens described as a legal requirement under European law. The lawyer added that Assange had repeatedly offered to answer questions about the investigation, to no avail.

The exact nature of the allegations facing Assange weren't completely clear.

Stephens has in the past described them as part of "a post-facto dispute over consensual, but unprotected sex." Even Swedish prosecutors have disagreed about whether to label the most serious charge as rape.

Formal charges have not been filed, but the arrest order was issued Nov. 18 at the request of Marianne Ny, Sweden's Director of Public Prosecution.

Pressure on Amazon

Amazon's move to evict WikiLeaks from its servers came after congressional staff called the company to inquire about its relationship with WikiLeaks, Sen. Joe Lieberman, the Connecticut independent, said Wednesday.

"The company's decision to cut off WikiLeaks now is the right decision and should set the standard for other companies WikiLeaks is using to distribute its illegally seized material," Lieberman said in a statement. He added that he would have further questions for Amazon about its dealings with WikiLeaks.

The White House said it was taking new steps to protect government secrets after WikiLeaks released thousands of sensitive U.S. diplomatic cables. Officials said national security adviser Tom Donilon had appointed a senior aide to identify and develop changes needed in light of the document dump.

A lawyer for WikiLeaks' founder condemned calls for his assassination Thursday and claimed remarks by Sarah Palin may prevent him from getting fair trial in U.S. Full story

Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard called WikiLeaks' publication of classified documents "an illegal thing to do" on Thursday.

But Gillard did not indicate Australia was about to take legal action against Australian-born Assange.

The country's attorney general reiterated that authorities were investigating whether Assange has broken any Australian laws, but have not yet reached a conclusion.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40467957/ns/us_news-wikileaks_in_security/

[^_^ 5,021]

He deserves to be assassinated.

[Harsh_77 718]

I don’t know he deserved to be assassinated or not, but by releasing the confidential documents, he did not do the right thing. They don’t add any value to civilized world other then put more ppls life in danger.

The leak only aide the terrorist organization to recruit more and more ppl for their cause.

I don’t think wiki leaks founder did any great think by exposing the secret deals between nations to curtail terrorism, all the documents he has published talk about secret deal between govts of various countries to fight terrorism.

Most educated and political savvy ppl know about such agreements its nothing new that he has exposed a great big scandal.

By exposing such deal he is aiding terrorist as other govts would not want to support and fight terrorism.

[JohnSmith2007 353]

I guess he didn't think about the people that are going to die because of his leaks. While I want an open government we still have a vital need for state secrets. I guess karma will win in the end.

[keysjangle 145]

What WikiLeaks is trying to do is wake people up. Why should a government have to keep secrets in the first place? I know it's very ideological to think that, but the vast majority of people DO believe that ideal: the government is honest and forthcoming. It doesn't mean they want to raze the U.S. government, just make them answer for what they've done. If Obama wants to be able to read BBMs, texts, instant messaging transcripts, etc, why can't the people have their own look into the government?

[JohnSmith2007 353]

What WikiLeaks is trying to do is wake people up. Why should a government have to keep secrets in the first place? I know it's very ideological to think that, but the vast majority of people DO believe that ideal: the government is honest and forthcoming. It doesn't mean they want to raze the U.S. government, just make them answer for what they've done. If Obama wants to be able to read BBMs, texts, instant messaging transcripts, etc, why can't the people have their own look into the government?

When dealing with diplomatic situations secrets are vital. There will always be reasons, good reasons, for state secrets.

[Dan J 277]

Some people prefer to shoot the messenger as opposed to dealing with their own problems.

[Ban Hammer 13,327]

how can a citizen of another country be tried for treason by the us?

[keysjangle 145]

When dealing with diplomatic situations secrets are vital. There will always be reasons, good reasons, for state secrets.

I understand that, and it is a realistic truth in today's world. But when the war in the middle east was sold to the world as "bringing democracy" and you are being pushed to donate your money to "rebuild" Haiti, you HAVE to ask questions. It's like signing a contract: read the entire thing first, don't just sign it and accept what's been put in front of you because you believe someone is doing what's best for you. A lot of the time, they don't care about the individual person, and they will twist and spin whatever they can to make it appear otherwise. Whether or not you act based on what alternative information you find is your choice. But after learning about where my donation money to Haiti went, my respect for that kind of cash-recycling bureaucracy went out the window. And this isn't just the U.S., it's Canada and the entire world.

[JohnSmith2007 353]

Some people prefer to shoot the messenger as opposed to dealing with their own problems.

I don't see a problem with the secrets. I do see a problem when someone takes it upon themselves to decide what should be secret and what shouldn't be. In this case the messenger is the problem.

[The_Dude 1,142]

Some people prefer to shoot the messenger as opposed to dealing with their own problems.

But in this case, a serious crime against the nation was commited. The guy who provided Assange with the documents should be tried for treason, and Assange tried for espionage. Hopefull, the U.S. millitary and intelligence agencies will learn from this and restrict access to certain documents. I know Assange says he did it so that governments of the world would be more transparent in their dealings. This wont' accomplish that, all it does is embarass a lot of politicians, and draw their ire.

how can a citizen of another country be tried for treason by the us?

Do not dare contradict anything that Sarah Palin says!!! She'll gut you like a halibut.

[Ban Hammer 13,327]

Do not dare contradict anything that Sarah Palin says!!! She'll gut you like a halibut.

according to the op, hiccupabee said it too.

[^_^ 5,021]

hiccupabee - does he have a drinking problem too?

[Deputy Purple 1,294]

how can a citizen of another country be tried for treason by the us?

The sources of his documents must surely be US Citizens, they can.

Anyone can be tried for espionage.

[Ban Hammer 13,327]

hiccupabee - does he have a drinking problem too?

if he's agreeing with palin about this, he must.

The sources of his documents must surely be US Citizens, they can.

Anyone can be tried for espionage.

i disagree on that last line.