hi

[luckytxn 2,264]

funny how that worked out, eh?

As usual.

It is always about him though and what he desires and wants.

[^_^ 5,021]

So me not wanting to get into a conversation about swadhyayis and recommending the thread be moved to South Asia where the OP might have actually received good advice..... is now q bad thing?

[Ban Hammer 13,334]

So me not wanting to get into a conversation about swadhyayis and recommending the thread be moved to South Asia where the OP might have actually received good advice..... is now q bad thing?

move to the south asia forum, where it will never see the light of day again.

[luckytxn 2,264]

So me not wanting to get into a conversation about swadhyayis and recommending the thread be moved to South Asia where the OP might have actually received good advice..... is now q bad thing?

Maybe recommending it be moved was maybe good but saying you don't want to discuss it and that it be moved was a tad egotistical.

[^_^ 5,021]

move to the south asia forum, where it will never see the light of day again.

swadhyaya is a south asian practice.

Maybe recommending it be moved was maybe good but saying you don't want to discuss it and that it be moved was a tad egotistical.

that was not the intention.

[chri'stina 190]

Wow. What a thread. Never myself heard of someone claiming violation of TOS for asking someone to participate in a thread they didn't want to.

[luckytxn 2,264]

swadhyaya is a south asian practice.

that was not the intention.

Okie dokie.

[Ban Hammer 13,334]

swadhyaya is a south asian practice.

i'll read up on it. sounds fascinating.

[The_Dude 1,142]

very close in meaning? are you kidding me?

In the context of how I was using them, yes, they are quite similar. Taunting someone online is synonymous with trolling.

The point of this Charles was to point out how absurd your thread ban of me was. You did the same thing essentially, yet I am the one that gets banned. Nice.

[Ban Hammer 13,334]

Wow. What a thread. Never myself heard of someone claiming violation of TOS for asking someone to participate in a thread they didn't want to.

personally, i blame aj, then the british.

[Ban Hammer 13,334]

In the context of how I was using them, yes, they are quite similar. Taunting someone online is synonymous with trolling.

The point of this Charles was to point out how absurd your thread ban of me was. You did the same thing essentially, yet I am the one that gets banned. Nice.

trying to compare this thread to that thread where you were tossing around insults/name calling is ludicrous and cheapens your credibility.

following me around from thread to thread with this issue won't get you results. take it up with the fuzzy one.

[scandal 951]

So me not wanting to get into a conversation about swadhyayis and recommending the thread be moved to South Asia where the OP might have actually received good advice..... is now q bad thing?

If the OP dares set foot back in this thread, what must he think of what's been done to it.

Oh well, not the worst thread hijacking I've ever seen.

[Ban Hammer 13,334]

bleh i did an almaty. darn hughesnet!

Edited November 30, 2010 by charles!

[scandal 951]

personally, i blame aj, then the british.

I'm sure the Aussies have plenty to answer for. Oh, and the Canadians too no doubt.....

Then again, it IS you Charles after all that is ruining our Internetz.

Edited November 30, 2010 by scandal

[The_Dude 1,142]

trying to compare this thread to that thread where you were tossing around insults/name calling is ludicrous and cheapens your credibility.

following me around from thread to thread with this issue won't get you results. take it up with the fuzzy one.

Actually Charles, if you read closely, this discussion has been confined to this thread. Secondly, you're exaggerating here. You thread banned me for calling someone a hemorrhoid, then you quoted that same Term of Service as your rationale. It's not quite so funny when you do it Charles? You can't even see where you are being absurd? Sad really.