British Troops burn in HELL!

[Ban Hammer 13,334]

http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/the-firebombing-of-tokyo-continues

http://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~eroberts/courses/ww2/projects/firebombing/websitetokyo1.htm

sounds similar to dresden - death tolls on it range from low 20's to as high as half a mill. difficult to come up with a good figure due to it being crammed with refugees.

http://www.rense.com/general19/flame.htm

Tokyo's fire bombing killed 80 to 200,000. Brutal and deadlier than Hiroshima or Nagasaki and worse than Dresden by far.

not according to some reports - see the link i posted in reply to aj

[Matt&Divorced 0]

dresden, anybody? it's not just nukes that can kill tens of thousands.

or a bad case of biowar...scary part is that is easier to do than get a nuke...smallpox anyone?

[Ban Hammer 13,334]

or a bad case of biowar...scary part is that is easier to do than get a nuke...smallpox anyone?

smallpox might be a bit difficult, as it only (supposedly) exists in two places in the world. anthrax is a lot scarier. and it probably will be a terrorist that weaponizes ebola, vee, rift valley fever, or hanta virus.

[Amby 490]

Whoaaaaa...I just read "Matt&kari" as "Matt&karl" and wondered when that was allowed by uscis. And the even funnier thing is my phone just auto corrected uscis to "hacks" lol

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Women who seek abortions are not terrorists and bringing abortion into this is despicable.

Not at all despicable. Credibilty re the killing of innocents by trrrorists is null and void when approval is given for the murder of the most innocent.

I don't have an issue with a woman making an educated decision to have an abortion. I don't care if you label my position pro-choice or pro-abortion.

Danno if you are against abortion don't get one.

Sof get real, a woman choosing abortion is in no way comparable to an A-hole blowing up others in the name of Allah and a bent vision of Islam.

Sure, it is.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

I understand that. I've stated many times that 1 out of 4 humans are actually of the Muslim faith. We are talking of 1.8 billion Muslims, give or take 300 million (give/take size of entire US population). Obviously when we are dealing with billions (a number most cannot grasp) then a couple hundred thousand terrorists is nothing (or 20,000 or whatever the number is).

The person that does not understand the difference is Sof because she is the one that gets defensive as if a terrorist and a Muslim are one in the same. When I say a Jihadist Terrorist is the most dangerous human ever to exist in all of history it is because if he/she got a hold of a nuke he/she would use it. I think Sof. subs out the word Jihadist Terrorist for Muslim and that is why she takes offense. It is really weird to tell you the truth.

You have plenty of American murderers running around the country but I don't go and defend them because they are American.

You fail as a mind reader. No doubt we see things differently, but I'm not being defensive when I offer a different and less simplistic perspective to the discussion. It's condescending to insist that I'm doing otherwise; just try harder to see that there is more than one point of view to consider.

[_Simpson_ 250]

I hear that the American military is notorious for friendly fire.

I hear their well know for saving lives.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Spin for spin