Man charged with D.C.-area subway bomb plot

[ready4ONE 5,400]

There is no such thing as an Islamic terrorist.

Actually this is a story of yet another Islamic Terrorist caught and hopefully about to become some Bubbas jailhouse girlfriend. The good news here is his undoing started when a non-like thinking Islamist dropped a dime to the FBI about his blood thirsty dreams of death to the infidels in the name of Islam.

Truly that is the good news here!

Edited October 29, 2010 by ready4ONE

[Sofiyya 1,687]

There is no such thing as an Islamic terrorist.

[^_^ 5,021]

This is what happens when persons entering the USA are not adequately vetted. The USA wants to have an immigration system, but refuses to invest the necessary funding to manage and run it in a competent manner. Recently there have been allegations that US-CIS is rubber stamping applications and that supervisors are more interested in clearing backlogs than scrutinizing applications in a competent manner. Maybe it is about time to reduce or even eliminate immigration to a level that can be competently managed with the limited resources the politicians are willing to fund. The American people are tired of this sh*t. Why do we need to import people that want to kill us? This is stupid.

I agree. Either increase funding so we can 'do it right' or decrease immigration levels to match current levels of funding.

There is no such thing as an Islamic terrorist.

What next, there is no Santa Claus? GTFO!

[The_Dude 1,142]

re-read my statement

Your statement is quite clear. Your response to my question however is not.

There is no such thing as an Islamic terrorist.

cough bullsh!t cough

[ready4ONE 5,400]

There is no such thing as an Islamic terrorist.

See Bin Laden et al. Not proud of the Muslim who ratted out this a$$whipe?

[Obama 2012 1,714]

There is no such thing as an Islamic terrorist.

you can say it all you want, but doesn't change the fact that there are.....

[Sofiyya 1,687]

you can say it all you want, but doesn't change the fact that there are.....

You can say Islamic terrorists all you want, but that doesn't change the fact that there aren't any. If the ground rules of discourse on this thread is that one must engage in polemic rhetoric and wallow in ignorance, than so be it. I prefer not to, but I can understand if reality has no meaning here, so baiting, ignorance and venting can prevail. It's only fair to make that clear from the start, that's all.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

This is what happens when persons entering the USA are not adequately vetted. The USA wants to have an immigration system, but refuses to invest the necessary funding to manage and run it in a competent manner. Recently there have been allegations that US-CIS is rubber stamping applications and that supervisors are more interested in clearing backlogs than scrutinizing applications in a competent manner. Maybe it is about time to reduce or even eliminate immigration to a level that can be competently managed with the limited resources the politicians are willing to fund. The American people are tired of this sh*t. Why do we need to import people that want to kill us? This is stupid.

I'll bet American Indians felt the same way about all the White Christians who showed up to kill them, forcibly convert them, steal their lands, enslave Africans and exploit the resources. Same goes for European colonialists.

[Obama 2012 1,714]

You can say Islamic terrorists all you want, but that doesn't change the fact that there aren't any. If the ground rules of discourse on this thread is that one must engage in polemic rhetoric and wallow in ignorance, than so be it. I prefer not to, but I can understand if reality has no meaning here, so baiting, ignorance and venting can prevail. It's only fair to make that clear from the start, that's all.

When a group of people of a certain faith/idealism consistently act in a certain manner, in the name of said faith/idealism, then whatever they are, gets the adjective of their cause.

It's not meant as an insult of said group as a whole.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

When a group of people of a certain faith/idealism consistently act in a certain manner, in the name of said faith/idealism, then whatever they are, gets the adjective of their cause.

It's not meant as an insult of said group as a whole.

It is an insult to the whole group, for one thing, because non-Muslims support terrorist philosophy and their definitions over those of non-violent Muslims. You insist on telling us what should or should not insult us, and that you and the minority of terrorists control the language. Assigning terrorism to Islam, despite our objections, tells us that you are with the terrorists, and that you refuse to even consider that not only you could be wrong, but that you refuse to consider the possibility that you are not qualified to lead the discourse.

Few of us have anything in common with terrorists. We don't share their hatred or disdain, their philosophy, their agenda, their emphasis on violence for God. They are so unlike us, but they and you, insist on linking them to us by labour their acts, behavior, philosophy, politics and ignorance as "Islamic", when there is nothing Islamic about it at all. By shoving them at us, defining our faith for us, you demonstrate that you identify more with them than with non-violent Muslims.

By telling others that their way is real Islam, you are saying that the practice of terrorists is normative, which makes the majority of Muslims non-observant and ignorant of their faith. You refuse to listen to us, learn about us, because you are so focused on them. You are part of the problem; don't be so arrogant you can't see that.

[Danno 1,228]

When a group of people of a certain faith/idealism consistently act in a certain manner, in the name of said faith/idealism, then whatever they are, gets the adjective of their cause.

It's not meant as an insult of said group as a whole.

It's beyond "certain people"..... there are islamic leaders stoking this fire and using the Koran to do so as well.

Can it be reasonably believed that all these people are actually Atheists impersonating Muslims?

[Obama 2012 1,714]

It is an insult to the whole group, for one thing, because non-Muslims support terrorist philosophy and their definitions over those of non-violent Muslims. You insist on telling us what should or should not insult us, and that you and the minority of terrorists control the language. Assigning terrorism to Islam, despite our objections, tells us that you are with the terrorists, and that you refuse to even consider that not only you could be wrong, but that you refuse to consider the possibility that you are not qualified to lead the discourse.

Few of us have anything in common with terrorists. We don't share their hatred or disdain, their philosophy, their agenda, their emphasis on violence for God. They are so unlike us, but they and you, insist on linking them to us by labour their acts, behavior, philosophy, politics and ignorance as "Islamic", when there is nothing Islamic about it at all. By shoving them at us, defining our faith for us, you demonstrate that you identify more with them than with non-violent Muslims.

By telling others that their way is real Islam, you are saying that the practice of terrorists is normative, which makes the majority of Muslims non-observant and ignorant of their faith. You refuse to listen to us, learn about us, because you are so focused on them. You are part of the problem; don't be so arrogant you can't see that.

I would only be insulted if I were hiding something in a case like this. Whether they believe Islam the same way you do or not is completely irrelevant. There are several sects of Christianity as well that have different beliefs. Just as you may believe Islam one way, doesn't mean others don't believe it another way. Your way is only 'right' in your eyes because that's what you believe. No one is trying to insult you, they are simply stating a fact. A large group of people believe Islam focuses a certain way. they call their religion Islam just as any other part, so they are in fact Islamic Terrorists.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Ok, all the arrogant, ignorant non-Muslims believing they know better should gather together to solve this problem by digesting Islam bashing blogs, ignoring knowledgable Muslims and preaching to the choir. That'll do it. It's all up to your closed minds now. Don't expect us to do a thing to help you. You clearly dont want our help.

Edited October 29, 2010 by Sofiyya

[ready4ONE 5,400]

Ok, all the arrogant, ignorant non-Muslims believing they know better should gather together to solve this problem by digesting Islam bashing blogs, ignoring knowledgable Muslims and preaching to the choir. That'll do it. It's all up to your closed minds now. Don't expect us to do a thing to help you. You clearly dont want our help.

I indicated considerable gratitude to the Muslim who reported this guy to the FBI but am curious about your apparent lack of recognition to that fact. Why ignore it?

[Hilarious Clinton 452]

Just the Islamic ones? So you're cool with the Catholic ones?

This tread is about Islamic terrorism.