Jump to content
one...two...tree

GOP House Candidate On Civil Rights: ‘We Need To Get Our Federal Government Out Of The Way’

 Share

5 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline

Jim-Renacci.jpg

OH-16 GOP nominee Jim Renacci

Fireworks occurred during a town hall in Canton, OH, last night when Rep. John Boccieri (D-OH) unexpectedly showed up at his Republican opponent’s public event. Challenger Jim Renacci and Boccieri sparred for about 70 minutes in an unofficial first debate. And ThinkProgress was in attendance. During the event, an African-American constituent named Robert Thompson asked Renacci what he would do on the issue of civil rights. Renacci’s response: local control. He called civil rights “local issues” and said the solution is “to get our federal government out of the way” because “it’s not the federal government’s job”:

ROBERT THOMPSON: What is your position in regards to addressing those concerns. And again, I’m concerned about the civil rights and the diversity of your campaign in terms of why anybody of color should be in support of you as a congressman.

RENACCI: [...]
A lot of the problems you’re talking about are local issues.
And I’m also a firm believer that the federal government and our Constitution was based on freedom, and was based on the freedoms that our number one goal of our military is freedom.
We need to get our federal government out of the way
and we need to allow our local governments to become more involved in many of the issues you’re talking about.
I don’t believe these are federal issues to come down.
I believe the federal government’s number one goal is to protect our freedoms. So the answer to your question is I believe a lot of things need to come back to the local level, and I believe things like you’re talking about do need to go back to the local level. And they need to be looked at in the cities. I was a mayor of my community. I think those are important ways of looking at all that.
It’s not the federal government’s job.

Thompson astutely responded by pointing out that, “but for the federal government, we wouldn’t have had civil rights. … It took the federal government to come in and say ‘you can’t discriminate for housing, you can’t discriminate for jobs, you can’t discriminate for education.’” Local governments, Thompson concluded, “are the ones that were holding us back.”

Indeed, while “local control” may be appropriate for some matters, Renacci’s response indicates a dangerous ignorance of both past and present civil rights issues. One need look no further than the
of Jefferson Thomas this week. Thomas was a member of the Little Rock Nine who, under the protection of the U.S. Army, endured the taunts and violence of racist mobs in order to integrate Arkansas’s Central High School following the
Brown v. Board
Supreme Court decision. Federal intervention was absolutely necessary as Arkansas Gov. Orval Faubus had “
to keep black students out” of the school.

Moreover, Renacci has a strange notion of the word “freedom.” When President Lyndon Johnson called upon Congress to protect the voting rights of all Americans, he promised the new law would “
.” But in Renacci’s world, “freedom” apparently means the right to be free from such measures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not just disband as a country then?

I mean seriously, how can you progress when you have people who view their federal government as the enemy? People who fail to acknowledge that the Katrina disaster was a prime example of what happens when you have a fragment federal, state and regional government. It was freakin embarrassing for America and its reputation took another massive hit abroad. Oh noes, they still do not see or accept the inefficiencies with the states rights system or how empowering the federal government would have helped here.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...