Jump to content
sdchargers

Bona fide marriage, will USCIS question intent?

 Share

6 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: France
Timeline

Hi everyone,

I am a USC and my wife and I got married July 14th 2010. We actually decided to get married early July because she didn't like her internship (she was a J1 trainee) and she was considering quitting.

However, we were already living together for 1yr at the time, and dating for over 2 years at the time. We were planning on getting married all along, it just happened earlier than expected.

In the meantime, my wife got fired from her internship 2 day before the wedding. We file AOS in August and the application is pending.

Will USCIS question our intent? Like I said, we were planning on getting married all along, it just happened earlier.

We have all the documentation to establish a bona fide marriage ( lease, insurance, joint bills, pics...)

Thanks for your help!

I am the US citizen, my wife is the applicant.

Adjusting from J1 Trainee visa:

August 25th, 2010: Filed AOS package to USCIS

August 27th, 2010: Package received by USCIS

September 2nd, 2010: Received I797 for I-130, I-485, I-765

October 14th, 2010: Received biometrics appointment letter (will be on Nov 5th)

AOS interview will be on January 13th, 2011!

January 13th, 2011: Approved at the day of the interview

Next step, removal of conditions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: F-2A Visa Country: Jamaica
Timeline

i dont see this being a problem.. you have all the necessary evidence if a real relationship.

Current cut off date F2A - Current 

Brother's Journey (F2A) - PD Dec 30, 2010


Dec 30 2010 - Notice of Action 1 (NOA1)
May 12 2011 - Notice of Action 2 (NOA2)
May 23 2011 - NVC case # Assigned
Nov 17 2011 - COA / I-864 received
Nov 18 2011 - Sent COA
Apr 30 2012 - Pay AOS fee

Oct 15 2012 - Pay IV fee
Oct 25 2012 - Sent AOS/IV Package

Oct 29 2012 - Pkg Delivered
Dec 24 2012 - Case Complete

May 17 2013 - Interview-Approved

July 19 2013 - Enter the USA

"... Answer when you are called..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Firstly, you have plenty of evidence of a bona fide relationship that looks like one that could've ended in marriage by July even without extenuating circumstances.

Secondly, USCIS do understand that people do, to a certain extent, plan their marriages around immigration. Most K1 filers would probably have waited longer to get married if it wasn't for immigration. (Ie, they would choose to live close by for a while before getting married.) Which means they are used to people getting married spontaneously/quickly/etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline

Even if they could question intent (which I've read repeatedly you can't), intent applies to her ENTRY. It's obvious if she's been a J1 for at least a year she entered the US with the INTENT to study, not to marry you. Sure it happened eventually but it doesn't look like that was her sole purpose on entry.

** moved from "Adjustment of Status (Green Card) from Family Based Visas" to "Adjustment of Status from Work, Student, & Tourist Visas" as you are adjusting from a J1 visa and the prior forum is for K1, K2, K3 & K4 **

Edited by Vanessa&Tony
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Vietnam
Timeline

Even if they could question intent (which I've read repeatedly you can't), intent applies to her ENTRY. It's obvious if she's been a J1 for at least a year she entered the US with the INTENT to study, not to marry you. Sure it happened eventually but it doesn't look like that was her sole purpose on entry.

** moved from "Adjustment of Status (Green Card) from Family Based Visas" to "Adjustment of Status from Work, Student, & Tourist Visas" as you are adjusting from a J1 visa and the prior forum is for K1, K2, K3 & K4 **

Being my ####### retentive self... :whistle:

They can question intent. In fact, they are supposed to question intent. If they couldn't then it would be rather pointless to have a law against "preconceived intent". What they are not supposed to do is deny based solely on preconceived intent. This is because precedent cases at the BIA have established that preconceived intent, while a serious negative factor, is not enough on it's own to outweigh the positive factor of being an immediate relative of a US citizen. If preconceived intent is all they've got to throw at the applicant, then they're supposed to use their discretion to approve the AOS.

None of the above applies to the OP's case, but it's important that people understand that intent is not irrelevant. It's one straw. Get enough straws, and you've broken the camel's back. :blush:

Back to the OP's case - Does your wife's J1 visa have a home residency requirement?

12/15/2009 - K1 Visa Interview - APPROVED!

12/29/2009 - Married in Oakland, CA!

08/18/2010 - AOS Interview - APPROVED!

05/01/2013 - Removal of Conditions - APPROVED!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline
Being my ####### retentive self... :whistle:

They can question intent. In fact, they are supposed to question intent. If they couldn't then it would be rather pointless to have a law against "preconceived intent". What they are not supposed to do is deny based solely on preconceived intent. This is because precedent cases at the BIA have established that preconceived intent, while a serious negative factor, is not enough on it's own to outweigh the positive factor of being an immediate relative of a US citizen. If preconceived intent is all they've got to throw at the applicant, then they're supposed to use their discretion to approve the AOS.

None of the above applies to the OP's case, but it's important that people understand that intent is not irrelevant. It's one straw. Get enough straws, and you've broken the camel's back. :blush:

Back to the OP's case - Does your wife's J1 visa have a home residency requirement?

I stand corrected :) I will add it to my treasure-trove of info :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
“;}
×
×
  • Create New...