Kingston JA Embassy

[MrsErnie 0]

Our Interview on 9.28.10 thankfully was successful. However, just some information to note. As far as I previously gathered, both parties to the K-1 petition have been allowed to attend the interview. It only makes sense if the point of the interview is to solidify the notion that the union is "bonafide" So I booked my ticket, took time off from work and we both showed up in the POURING RAIN. At the gate, I was informed that ONLY the beneficiary would be granted access. So of course I proceeded to explain that this is a K-1 petition and we were both required to be present. I asked to speak with someone else, because clearly this man don't have a clue. I was informed by 2 different Embassy representatives of the "new" rule (established a few weeks ago and of course not published ANYWHERE) whereby IF an interview is needed with the petitioner, a SEPARATE DATE will be scheduled. As if, at a whim, I can tell my boss I'm not coming in today and fly home. The rep said "It's good you're here to support him but you can't come in" I can only find that funny, now that it's over. How much support could I have given from outside - luckily we drove, but nonetheless, it was raining and who can burn AC for 4hrs when gas so dear? The "new rule" contradicts why blue slips are issued when some petitioners are not present in the 1st place. One wonders if he did receive a blue slip for me to be present, would they have allowed him to come get me from the outside??? We've known each other for 8yrs and were prepared for whatever they came with, but all he got was: When did we meet? When did the relationship turn serious? When will we get married? Go pay at the DHL window. So for those with upcoming interviews - you may want to inquire of this "new rule" prior to making any travel arrangements.

[DedicatedWife 4]

Our Interview on 9.28.10 thankfully was successful. However, just some information to note. As far as I previously gathered, both parties to the K-1 petition have been allowed to attend the interview. It only makes sense if the point of the interview is to solidify the notion that the union is "bonafide" So I booked my ticket, took time off from work and we both showed up in the POURING RAIN. At the gate, I was informed that ONLY the beneficiary would be granted access. So of course I proceeded to explain that this is a K-1 petition and we were both required to be present. I asked to speak with someone else, because clearly this man don't have a clue. I was informed by 2 different Embassy representatives of the "new" rule (established a few weeks ago and of course not published ANYWHERE) whereby IF an interview is needed with the petitioner, a SEPARATE DATE will be scheduled. As if, at a whim, I can tell my boss I'm not coming in today and fly home. The rep said "It's good you're here to support him but you can't come in" I can only find that funny, now that it's over. How much support could I have given from outside - luckily we drove, but nonetheless, it was raining and who can burn AC for 4hrs when gas so dear? The "new rule" contradicts why blue slips are issued when some petitioners are not present in the 1st place. One wonders if he did receive a blue slip for me to be present, would they have allowed him to come get me from the outside??? We've known each other for 8yrs and were prepared for whatever they came with, but all he got was: When did we meet? When did the relationship turn serious? When will we get married? Go pay at the DHL window. So for those with upcoming interviews - you may want to inquire of this "new rule" prior to making any travel arrangements.

First off, congrats on your approval. Thanks for the updated information!

[Fishlady 2]

Congratulations, and I could imagine what would have happened if they decided they wanted to interview the petitioner... means u would have had to fly back again...

[JAPrincess 27]

Our Interview on 9.28.10 thankfully was successful. However, just some information to note. As far as I previously gathered, both parties to the K-1 petition have been allowed to attend the interview. It only makes sense if the point of the interview is to solidify the notion that the union is "bonafide" So I booked my ticket, took time off from work and we both showed up in the POURING RAIN. At the gate, I was informed that ONLY the beneficiary would be granted access. So of course I proceeded to explain that this is a K-1 petition and we were both required to be present. I asked to speak with someone else, because clearly this man don't have a clue. I was informed by 2 different Embassy representatives of the "new" rule (established a few weeks ago and of course not published ANYWHERE) whereby IF an interview is needed with the petitioner, a SEPARATE DATE will be scheduled. As if, at a whim, I can tell my boss I'm not coming in today and fly home. The rep said "It's good you're here to support him but you can't come in" I can only find that funny, now that it's over. How much support could I have given from outside - luckily we drove, but nonetheless, it was raining and who can burn AC for 4hrs when gas so dear? The "new rule" contradicts why blue slips are issued when some petitioners are not present in the 1st place. One wonders if he did receive a blue slip for me to be present, would they have allowed him to come get me from the outside??? We've known each other for 8yrs and were prepared for whatever they came with, but all he got was: When did we meet? When did the relationship turn serious? When will we get married? Go pay at the DHL window. So for those with upcoming interviews - you may want to inquire of this "new rule" prior to making any travel arrangements.

that is CRAZY and makes absolutely ZERO sense to me!

I bet you were going nuts waiting in that car for 4 hours

Happy news tho, congrats on your approval!

[RICARDO4EVA2 194]

Our Interview on 9.28.10 thankfully was successful. .

C/O/N/G/R/A/T/S

OK... "New Rule" Ha.. these people always seem to have stories. I got 2 Emails from the kingston embassy (7/26 & 8/11) with these bimbos tellin me that i'd be able to attend... so this is all void now ...? I'm the petitioner and had plans to fly to Jamaica to be in the interview for parents.

Edited October 2, 2010 by RICARDO4EVA2

[gain 0]

Our Interview on 9.28.10 thankfully was successful. However, just some information to note. As far as I previously gathered, both parties to the K-1 petition have been allowed to attend the interview. It only makes sense if the point of the interview is to solidify the notion that the union is "bonafide" So I booked my ticket, took time off from work and we both showed up in the POURING RAIN. At the gate, I was informed that ONLY the beneficiary would be granted access. So of course I proceeded to explain that this is a K-1 petition and we were both required to be present. I asked to speak with someone else, because clearly this man don't have a clue. I was informed by 2 different Embassy representatives of the "new" rule (established a few weeks ago and of course not published ANYWHERE) whereby IF an interview is needed with the petitioner, a SEPARATE DATE will be scheduled. As if, at a whim, I can tell my boss I'm not coming in today and fly home. The rep said "It's good you're here to support him but you can't come in" I can only find that funny, now that it's over. How much support could I have given from outside - luckily we drove, but nonetheless, it was raining and who can burn AC for 4hrs when gas so dear? The "new rule" contradicts why blue slips are issued when some petitioners are not present in the 1st place. One wonders if he did receive a blue slip for me to be present, would they have allowed him to come get me from the outside??? We've known each other for 8yrs and were prepared for whatever they came with, but all he got was: When did we meet? When did the relationship turn serious? When will we get married? Go pay at the DHL window. So for those with upcoming interviews - you may want to inquire of this "new rule" prior to making any travel arrangements.

Happy that you got thru! This is news to me! I was planning on having my husband fly down. Now you're telling me its a waste of time. Thanks for the advice and congrats again!

Our Interview on 9.28.10 thankfully was successful. However, just some information to note. As far as I previously gathered, both parties to the K-1 petition have been allowed to attend the interview. It only makes sense if the point of the interview is to solidify the notion that the union is "bonafide" So I booked my ticket, took time off from work and we both showed up in the POURING RAIN. At the gate, I was informed that ONLY the beneficiary would be granted access. So of course I proceeded to explain that this is a K-1 petition and we were both required to be present. I asked to speak with someone else, because clearly this man don't have a clue. I was informed by 2 different Embassy representatives of the "new" rule (established a few weeks ago and of course not published ANYWHERE) whereby IF an interview is needed with the petitioner, a SEPARATE DATE will be scheduled. As if, at a whim, I can tell my boss I'm not coming in today and fly home. The rep said "It's good you're here to support him but you can't come in" I can only find that funny, now that it's over. How much support could I have given from outside - luckily we drove, but nonetheless, it was raining and who can burn AC for 4hrs when gas so dear? The "new rule" contradicts why blue slips are issued when some petitioners are not present in the 1st place. One wonders if he did receive a blue slip for me to be present, would they have allowed him to come get me from the outside??? We've known each other for 8yrs and were prepared for whatever they came with, but all he got was: When did we meet? When did the relationship turn serious? When will we get married? Go pay at the DHL window. So for those with upcoming interviews - you may want to inquire of this "new rule" prior to making any travel arrangements.

Our Interview on 9.28.10 thankfully was successful. However, just some information to note. As far as I previously gathered, both parties to the K-1 petition have been allowed to attend the interview. It only makes sense if the point of the interview is to solidify the notion that the union is "bonafide" So I booked my ticket, took time off from work and we both showed up in the POURING RAIN. At the gate, I was informed that ONLY the beneficiary would be granted access. So of course I proceeded to explain that this is a K-1 petition and we were both required to be present. I asked to speak with someone else, because clearly this man don't have a clue. I was informed by 2 different Embassy representatives of the "new" rule (established a few weeks ago and of course not published ANYWHERE) whereby IF an interview is needed with the petitioner, a SEPARATE DATE will be scheduled. As if, at a whim, I can tell my boss I'm not coming in today and fly home. The rep said "It's good you're here to support him but you can't come in" I can only find that funny, now that it's over. How much support could I have given from outside - luckily we drove, but nonetheless, it was raining and who can burn AC for 4hrs when gas so dear? The "new rule" contradicts why blue slips are issued when some petitioners are not present in the 1st place. One wonders if he did receive a blue slip for me to be present, would they have allowed him to come get me from the outside??? We've known each other for 8yrs and were prepared for whatever they came with, but all he got was: When did we meet? When did the relationship turn serious? When will we get married? Go pay at the DHL window. So for those with upcoming interviews - you may want to inquire of this "new rule" prior to making any travel arrangements.

BTW MrsErnie, let us know when u get the visa in hand.

[MRStee 19]

Sorry this happened to you.. These embassies blow my mind with their nonsense sometime. Congrats on getting the visa though

Edited October 2, 2010 by MRStee

[sus 70]

Glad to hear that you got through - but this is beyond ridiculous of the embassy - I have seen many people get blue slipped to return with their SO - If I went down, was there, denied entry to the embassy, and got a blue slip to come back for a second interview I would be flipping out! There is no rhyme or reason to this process, it's like whatever the mood of the day!

[MrsErnie 0]

We'll see what they come with next, I'll be sure to update when the visa is actually in hand.

[TRELAWNY PARISH 10]

Ms.Ernie that is really strange. My cousin had her interview either either 9/28 or the week before I can't remember. Her fiance was able to go inside with her. They're also K-1 ...let me know if you find out anything else with this new rule.

[RICARDO4EVA2 194]

Ms.Ernie that is really strange. My cousin had her interview either either 9/28 or the week before I can't remember. Her fiance was able to go inside with her. They're also K-1 ...let me know if you find out anything else with this new rule.

I will have am answer tomorrow.. But I spoke with some one 2weeks ago and was told that I could enter.

[sugarapple 1]

OMG, that makes no sense what so ever!!!! A bunch of bull crock!! But what is new some govenrment rules dont make much sense.

[jamerican 2]

I am soooo confused.... My interview should be in the next couple of months but now I am not sure if I should book a trip or not??? Guess I will be sending an email.....ughhhhhhh

[RICARDO4EVA2 194]

I Called the Kingston Counsulate 2 days ago and spoke with a local cold hearted female. She said the process was changed and now the petitioner is not able to enter the building.. I told her that your office sent me 2 emails saying that I would be allowed to enter.. She said the email/s now won't work..

Edited October 7, 2010 by RICARDO4EVA2

[RICARDO4EVA2 194]

I am soooo confused.... My interview should be in the next couple of months but now I am not sure if I should book a trip or not??? Guess I will be sending an email.....ughhhhhhh

Noo Don't Email them... Call em' up... it's sooooooo much better! Keep up informed.