Need some little help over here!!, Gonna help ?

[RightClicK 17]

Hey guys

As you seen in my previous topic that i got a HUGE RFE , Here is a link http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/276254-rfe-arrived-s/

Anyways there is some point i don't understand well, so i will need someone to clarify this to me because am so confused and stressed to be honest ..the point is

Relatives in the U.S,:

Provide the names, addresses and phone numbers of all relatives living in the U.S, Also include how each

person is related to the petitioner (including in-laws).

The question is : Whom relative are they referring to ? Petitioner or Beneficiary ?

Thanks in advance

Sam

Edited September 30, 2010 by SamOnline

[LotofPatience 65]

Hey guys

As you seen in my previous topic that i got a HUGE RFE , Here is a link http://www.visajourn...-rfe-arrived-s/

Anyways there is some point i don't understand well, so i will need someone to clarify this to me because am so confused and stressed to be honest ..the point is

Relatives in the U.S,:

Provide the names, addresses and phone numbers of all relatives living in the U.S, Also include how each

person is related to the petitioner (including in-laws).

The question is : Whom relative are they referring to ? Petitioner or Beneficiary ?

Thanks in advance

Sam

Hossam,

Petitioner's. But if there are NO relatives, how can you include them? Then, explain there are no relatives here.

Loto

[RightClicK 17]

Hossam,

Petitioner's. But if there are NO relatives, how can you include them? Then, explain there are no relatives here.

Loto

Well, Do you know how many relative for my wife in the US .ALOOOOOOT ...i mean it ...Alotttt...and she can't get all of their contact, there are a lot of them she isn't contacting them . and there are beneficiaries that have relatives in the US , and that would make more sense to me..why would they ask about her's when they should be worried about me having relatives there and leave my wife n live with them ...got it ?

Sam

[Harpa Timsah 13,258]

You guys are married, so her relatives are your relatives. It says specifically in-laws, so I am guessing they mean all relatives for the two of you. I wouldn't worry about WHY they are asking it (although I guess it's due to people trying to use immigration to relocate entire families).

If your wife has too many relatives (and isn't in contact with them), what about focusing on immediate family... parents, siblings, grandparents, and maybe even aunts and uncles. For cousins, I would state which aunts/uncles have children and leave it at that. I will defer to more experiences people as to whether that may be a good idea. Good luck.

[LotofPatience 65]

Well, Do you know how many relative for my wife in the US .ALOOOOOOT ...i mean it ...Alotttt...and she can't get all of their contact, there are a lot of them she isn't contacting them . and there are beneficiaries that have relatives in the US , and that would make more sense to me..why would they ask about her's when they should be worried about me having relatives there and leave my wife n live with them ...got it ?

Sam

What USCIS worries is bona fide marriage. So, it will be helpful if couple of your relatives write letters and include them as well.

Loto

[RightClicK 17]

What USCIS worries is bona fide marriage. So, it will be helpful if couple of your relatives write letters and include them as well.

Loto

I don't have relatives in the US Loto...i want to know if they are asking about me (Beneficiary ) or my wife (Petitioner) ?

Sam

[LotofPatience 65]

I don't have relatives in the US Loto...i want to know if they are asking about me (Beneficiary ) or my wife (Petitioner) ?

Sam

Hossam,

If you don't have relatives, please state so in the letter. RFE is to the petitioner (Not to the beneficiary). So, the petitioner can list the details of her relatives in the response to the RFE alongwith all other RFE responses.

Loto

[RightClicK 17]

You guys are married, so her relatives are your relatives. It says specifically in-laws, so I am guessing they mean all relatives for the two of you. I wouldn't worry about WHY they are asking it (although I guess it's due to people trying to use immigration to relocate entire families).

If your wife has too many relatives (and isn't in contact with them), what about focusing on immediate family... parents, siblings, grandparents, and maybe even aunts and uncles. For cousins, I would state which aunts/uncles have children and leave it at that. I will defer to more experiences people as to whether that may be a good idea. Good luck.

You are making sense , You are right , Thanks for advice , I really appreciate it.

Sam

Hossam,

If you don't have relatives, please state so in the letter. RFE is to the petitioner (Not to the beneficiary). So, the petitioner can list the details of her relatives in the response to the RFE alongwith all other RFE responses.

Loto

You are so right too Loto , but i will be mentioning that i don't have relatives in the US but that my wife relatives are mine in law then i will list them .

Thanks bro .Wish you get your NOA2 soon.

Sam

Edited September 30, 2010 by SamOnline

[BMW 0]

You are making sense , You are right , Thanks for advice , I really appreciate it.

Sam

You are so right too Loto , but i will be mentioning that i don't have relatives in the US but that my wife relatives are mine in law then i will list them .

Thanks bro .Wish you get your NOA2 soon.

Sam

Is the realtive question for I-130 form Questions 13 and 14, then the relative in this context means the benificary.

[RightClicK 17]

Is the realtive question for I-130 form Questions 13 and 14, then the relative in this context means the benificary.

Everyone is making sense today...am being serious ...but the solution is obviously known ..will say i don't have blood relatives in the US and will say that my wife's relatives are mine IN-LAW as they asked and specified .

Thanks for the advice.

Sam

[Darnell 8,479]

Sam - make note of the 'voice' and 'intended reader' of the RFE, also.

The RFE is addressed to the Petitioner, not you -

so the 'intended reader' becomes the 'intended respondent'

and

the 'voice ' in which to reply,

is that of the Petitioner, not you.

Good Luck !

[RightClicK 17]

Sam - make note of the 'voice' and 'intended reader' of the RFE, also.

The RFE is addressed to the Petitioner, not you -

so the 'intended reader' becomes the 'intended respondent'

and

the 'voice ' in which to reply,

is that of the Petitioner, not you.

Good Luck !

Thank you darnell

Sam

[Darnell 8,479]

Hey Sam - any news?