Perhaps the Most Ridiculous Thing to Come Out of Washington Since George McClellan

[^_^ 5,021]

The House Republicans’ “Pledge to America” is out. A thrill will run up the leg of a few Chris Matthews’ types on the right. As Dan noted on Twitter, the Contract with America was 869 words and this is 21 pages. The Contract told you everything you needed to know about how a Republican Congress would be different from a Democrat Congress after 40 years of Democrat control.

These 21 pages tell you lots of things, some contradictory things, but mostly this: it is a serious of compromises and milquetoast rhetorical flourishes in search of unanimity among House Republicans because the House GOP does not have the fortitude to lead boldly in opposition to Barack Obama.

I have one message for John Boehner, Eric Cantor, and the House GOP Leadership: If they do not want to use the GOP to lead, I would like to borrow it for a time.

Yes, yes, it is full of mom tested, kid approved pablum that will make certain hearts on the right sing in solidarity. But like a diet full of sugar, it will actually do nothing but keep making Washington fatter before we crash from the sugar high.

It is dreck — dreck with some stuff I like, but like Brussels sprouts in butter. I like the butter, not the Brussels sprouts. Overall, this grand illusion of an agenda that will never happen is best spoken of today and then never again as if it did not happen. It is best forgotten.

The pledge begins by lamenting “an arrogant and out-of-touch government of self-appointed elites” issuing “mandates”, then proceeds to demand health care mandates on insurance companies that will drive up the costs of health care for ordinary Americans.

The plan wants to put “government on the path to a balanced budget” without doing anything substantive. There is a promise to “immediately reduce spending” by cutting off stimulus funds. Wow. Exciting.

There is a plan to cut Congress’s budget, which is pretty much what was promised in 1994. Seriously? In 4 years did the Democrats really blow up the Congressional budget? No — the GOP did that too.

There is no call for a Spending Limitation Amendment or a Balanced Budget Amendment. It is just meaningless stuff the Democrats can easily undo and that ultimately the Senate GOP will even turn its nose up at.

The entirety of this Promise is laughable. Why? It is an illusion that fixates on stuff the GOP already should be doing while not daring to touch on stuff that will have any meaningful longterm effects on the size and scope of the federal government.

This document proves the GOP is more focused on the acquisition of power than the advocacy of long term sound public policy. All the good stuff in it is stuff we expect them to do. What is not in it is more than a little telling that the House GOP has not learned much of anything from 2006.

I will vote Republican in November of 2010. But I will not carry their stagnant water.

http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/09/22/the-republicans-pledge-is-perhaps-the-most-ridiculous-thing-to-come-out-of-washington-since-george-mcclellan/

[Ban Hammer 13,469]

can't be any worse than voting for "transparency" - and you see what that got us.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Does anyone STILL need a document to know that both parties are ONLY concerned with power? Sheeesh.

What we REALLY is for a whole lot of people to vote not for Republicans or Democrats but for a third party and end this majority/minority BS that gets us nowhere. This is nothing but a perfect game of Tic-tac-toe and the only thing that changes is who gets to make "O"s and who gets to make "X"s. Stupid.

When one party HAS TO GET the cooperation of members of another party...things will change. Right now, all they have to do is stop the pther and despite our carefully crafted constitution we have allowed a majority of the Senate to implement a rule that requires nearly a 2/3 majority to get ANY legislation passed.

[luckytxn 2,265]

I got a laugh out of that and this is always good. This was the party that promised us less government and less taxes and less spending right? Well they gave us the opposite so why believe them now?

I wanted to add something. From what I read it pretty much said that they wanted to keep the status quo. Why is that a good thing?

Edited September 24, 2010 by luckytxn