Jump to content

1 post in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

http://www.newsmax.com/deBorchgrave/nuclearPakistanAbdulQadeer/2010/09/16/id/370531

Nuclear Outlaw May Be Next Pakistan Leader

2010/09/16 12:41

Pakistan's nuclear weapons renegade, who sold nuclear secrets to America's enemies (Iran, North Korea, and Libya) and spent the best part of the last decade under house arrest, is still Pakistan's most popular man.

Last week, Abdul Qadeer Khan, now a free man, was a guest on ARY, one of Pakistan's most popular TV channels with a strong anti-U.S. bias.

A frequent guest on ARY is another notorious anti-American, Gen. Hamid Gul, long retired as a former Inter-Services Intelligence agency chief and self-appointed adviser to Pakistan's anti-U.S. Islamist political parties.

Not only did he get 90 minutes of air time, but Khan talked openly of when he might be president or prime minister, enough to give official Washington conniption fits.

The flood-ravaged country of 180 million has been set back by five to 10 years by the worst disaster in the country's 63-year history, decimating its buffalo herd of some 26 million that produced about 70 percent of the country's milk, a staple diet for newborns and the country's youth.

Entire villages, along with flimsy dwellings, cars, trucks, livestock, bridges, roads, villages, all were washed away, leaving a gooey mud over an area the size of England.

For a truly biblical catastrophe, the loss in lives was small: 1,600. But 6 million are in desperate need of food and 3 million children are at risk from waterborne diseases.

Some 16 million people lost their meager livelihood and estimates of damage ranged from $20 billion to $40 billion. Total U.S. aid is $7.5 billion over five years. As U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told her opposite number in Islamabad, "There is acute donor fatigue in Congress."

Pakistan's civilian government never got its act together for flood relief and the army had to cut down drastically on its operations against Taliban on the Afghan border.

One estimate put the number of soldiers withdrawn from the tribal areas at 60,000, leaving 67,000 to cope with Taliban's privileged sanctuaries in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas in Afghanistan; the only one crowing about victory was the reclusive Taliban chief Mullah Omar, still in hiding after nine years of guerrilla warfare.

In a message read out in mosques throughout Afghanistan to mark the celebration of Eid al-Fitr, the official end of the Ramadan's month-long fast, Mullah Omar said, "the strategists behind the nine-year war" now realize they are "mired in complete failure. The victory of our Islamic nation over the invading infidels is now imminent and the driving force behind this is our faith in the help of Allah and the unity among us."

The Taliban's elusive chief, a veteran of the war against the Soviet occupation (1979-89), added that his fighters were forbidden to "harm common citizens."

Taliban's insurgents have already killed scores of their fellow Afghans for the perceived crime of collaborating with American and other allied soldiers.

Calling on all Afghans to expel foreign occupation forces, Mullah Omar said, "Put all your strength and planning behind the task of driving away the invaders and regaining the independence of our country."

Among the 47 nations — U.S. Army Gen. David Petraeus' number — engaged in Afghanistan on the U.S./NATO side, there was more talk about "decent exits" than staying the course.

The fighting Dutch left in August. The Canadians are going home next year, which leaves the United States and the United Kingdom the only two with fighting soldiers. But their domestic support is now less than 50 percent in each country.

Various geopolitical permutations are bandied about in Kabul's rumor mill. One scenario has Afghan President Hamid Karzai reconciling with Mullah Omar to accelerate the departure of all foreign forces.

Another has Mullah Omar and his original Taliban council of 10 elders coming to terms with the United States through private channels that would keep Karzai and Pakistan's ubiquitous ISI out of the picture.

Although Taliban leaders have denounced Afghanistan's parliamentary elections this weekend and threatened violence at the polls, some have established direct contact with a number of Afghan candidates to enlarge their clandestine support and undermine Karzai's.

Karzai, on the other hand, used his end of Ramadan message to call on Mullah Omar to stop fighting and join peace talks to end the war. At the same time, Karzai urged his Western backers to refocus their troops' objective on insurgent sanctuaries over the border in Pakistan rather than fight in Afghan villages and kill more civilians.

Karzai also set up a handpicked council of political friends to pursue peace talks with the Taliban, which he reckons are exhausted after nine years of fighting. That's a dangerous assumption in a country where tribesmen are born with an AK-47 in their cradles.

For the supreme U.S. commander, Petraeus, it is important to shed the idea of a military victory. Clearly, it is no longer possible.

The July 2011 deadline imposed by President Barack Obama means two entirely different things to Petraeus and Afghans. The latter see this as a major step toward total withdrawal irrespective of the military situation. This, in turn, encourages some local pols to make their peace with Taliban.

For Petraeus, it's flexible and will depend entirely on military progress on the ground. And this, in turn, depends on how much of the burden has been assumed by the new Afghan army.

Adding to a complex picture of imponderables is a thoroughly corrupt and underpaid police force.

When Karzai goes so far as to say that "NATO forces cannot win this war," Petraeus replies, "I'm saying the same thing . . . This is the reality. As I said in Iraq when I was the commander, you don't end an industrial-strength insurgency by killing or capturing all the bad guys. You have to kill, capture — or turn — the bad guys. And that means reintegration and reconciliation."

More likely in the year to come is a deal with Taliban that would lock out al-Qaida — and keep the advances made on behalf of women and schools for girls under Karzai since the defeat of Taliban following 9/11 in 2001.

Note: deBorchgrave ignored a critical event which occured 2010/07/22--the extension by fiat of the term of army-chief Ashfaq Kiani, the de-facto boss of the country (and a Punjabi to boot, more easily able to command loyalty from the country's ultra-venal dominant province than Bhopal-born mohajir Khan).

2005/07/10 I-129F filed for Pras

2005/11/07 I-129F approved, forwarded to NVC--to Chennai Consulate 2005/11/14

2005/12/02 Packet-3 received from Chennai

2005/12/21 Visa Interview Date

2006/04/04 Pras' entry into US at DTW

2006/04/15 Church Wedding at Novi (Detroit suburb), MI

2006/05/01 AOS Packet (I-485/I-131/I-765) filed at Chicago

2006/08/23 AP and EAD approved. Two down, 1.5 to go

2006/10/13 Pras' I-485 interview--APPROVED!

2006/10/27 Pras' conditional GC arrives -- .5 to go (2 yrs to Conditions Removal)

2008/07/21 I-751 (conditions removal) filed

2008/08/22 I-751 biometrics completed

2009/06/18 I-751 approved

2009/07/03 10-year GC received; last 0.5 done!

2009/07/23 Pras files N-400

2009/11/16 My 46TH birthday, Pras N-400 approved

2010/03/18 Pras' swear-in

---------------------------------------------------------------------

As long as the LORD's beside me, I don't care if this road ever ends.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...