Chris Matthews and Dan Rather regret they can't be the "gate Keepers" any more.

[Danno 1,228]

http://www.breitbart.tv/rather-lectures-matthews-panel-on-media-responsibility-in-koran-burning-story/

[Saddle Bronc 124]

Rather and Mathews were ever "gatekeepers"?

Only if one considers Ephialtes of Craxus as a "gatekeeper of Thermopylae" (Ephialtes was the one who betrayed Spartan king Leonidas by showing the Persians a backpath) or Vidkun Quisling as a "gatekeeper" of Norway!

[luckytxn 2,265]

Makes me laugh that Rather is lecturing about media responsibility.

[Saddle Bronc 124]

Makes me laugh that Rather is lecturing about media responsibility.

[Danno 1,228]

Makes me laugh that Rather is lecturing about media responsibility.

But we must remember when he says "responsibility" he means -Responsibility to report "their" political angle.

[The_Dude 1,142]

But we must remember when he says "responsibility" he means -Responsibility to report "their" political angle.

This coming from Andrew Breitbart, he who posts a clipped video that ended up costing a woman her job and ruining her reputation all in the name of politcal hackery. No wonder you seem to post from his site so much Danno.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

This coming from Andrew Breitbart, he who posts a clipped video that ended up costing a woman her job and ruining her reputation all in the name of politcal hackery. No wonder you seem to post from his site so much Danno.

Another reason I turned off the TV for good years ago. Saw it ONE time since then, when I was in the hospital. Reminded me why I turned it off. I should look at it every 10 years or so to remind myself.

BOTH are good reasons to vote Libertarian.

[Saddle Bronc 124]

Another reason I turned off the TV for good years ago. Saw it ONE time since then, when I was in the hospital. Reminded me why I turned it off. I should look at it every 10 years or so to remind myself.

BOTH are good reasons to vote Libertarian.

There are documents proving why Shirley Sherrod was made emeritus (meaning "out deservedly")) which way-predate Breitbart's video--such as the treatment she and her

husband meted out to their labourers

(all of whom were African-American) in 1970's.

[Danno 1,228]

This coming from Andrew Breitbart, he who posts a clipped video that ended up costing a woman her job and ruining her reputation all in the name of politcal hackery. No wonder you seem to post from his site so much Danno.

1. Are you actually believing full clips of anything are aired in any report?

2. He posted all of the clip that he had.

3. The woman should have been fired for stoking hate towards a whole classes of people (First whites, then the well to do).

[Saddle Bronc 124]

1. Are you actually believing full clips of anything are aired in any report?

2. He posted all of the clip that he had.

3. The woman should have been fired for stoking hate towards a whole classes of people (First whites, then the well to do).

Your list was inadequate, as it did not include:

4. The woman was known long ago to be abusive even of her own race--and was not fit to be in the post at all!