The eternal flame of Muslim outrage

[twowls 217]

Isn't Michelle Malkin the stupid skank calling for Muslims to be put in concentration camps? How can an article from such a person even be credible or worth reading?

She wrote a f*cking BOOK DEFENDING INTERNMENT CAMPS FOR JAPANESE AMERICANS IN WW2!!!

Here's the Factor 1 checklist for psychopaths. Enjoy this handy guide.

Aggressive narcissism

• Glibness/superficial charm
• Grandiose sense of self-worth
• Pathological lying
• Cunning/manipulative
• Lack of remorse or guilt
• Emotionally shallow
• Callous/lack of empathy
• Failure to accept responsibility for own actions

[Danno 1,228]

What Imam claimed it would be a national security issue ? the man is still trying to keep his center's location, however he did say if he received too much pressure, he would move and sell the property...so read up a little more on that if you're misinformed (can't be bothered to find you a link)

Governments and their most loyal arm -the media- have their own agenda, we all know that. In order to keep the 'terrorism' fantasy alive, you need to create an enemy, and since the 'threat of radical Islamic Fundamentalists' has become such a believable story ( you know that those idiots can beat the US's butt) ....why bother changing it. what the pastor was barking he was going to do was just plain dumb and disrespectful. Not a vision of what 'civilized' America is about of course, but the tables had to be turned around, didn't they! how many American muslims were gona react all crazy to that bullshit, and how many of them were going to call Christianity 'evil'. There are American Muslims you know, I was born and raised a Christian, but I converted 15 years ago.

Oh and let's pose an equally valid question: are the Jews of the world Hyper sensitive? I mean why do I feel like we can never talk about that. does Israel REALLY need to use the violence it uses against innocent civilians (e.g. Gaza last new years)...like I said, there's clearly a powerful agenda, you either open your mind to see what's really going on, or continue to make assumptions based on articles like this one right here...

anyway I'm actually tired of this discussion man, it's getting boring, people can believe what they want to believe. I just originally came in to say most of us are blind to what the media feeds us, to what agendas our governments have in store for us, and that we should be a little more proactive in seeking truths for ourselves, making a mental shift from being 'fed information' to actually researching a variety of sources (there's 2 sides-or more- to every story) to make informed comments and arguments.

-THe Ground Zero Imam claimed it was a national security issue that it go ahead.

-There have been far to many Body bags in THe USA, Spain, UK, Russia, Etc to call "terrorism" a "fantasy.

-I would agree the Jews do seem hyper sensitive and it must be frustrating for you that they seem to have an "untouchable" hedge around them in many respects.

[Pooky 3,783]

She wrote a f*cking BOOK DEFENDING INTERNMENT CAMPS FOR JAPANESE AMERICANS IN WW2!!!

Here's the Factor 1 checklist for psychopaths. Enjoy this handy guide.

Aggressive narcissism

• Glibness/superficial charm
• Grandiose sense of self-worth
• Pathological lying
• Cunning/manipulative
• Lack of remorse or guilt
• Emotionally shallow
• Callous/lack of empathy
• Failure to accept responsibility for own actions

Well, that describes a host of people in this thread alone

[Bad_Daddy 2,209]

There are no Islamic countries. Not all Muslim countries are as you describe. Islam has nothing to do with your biased views. If you guys sounded like you knew what you're talking about instead of parroting stereotypes, you could be taken more seriously.

So what steps are all these "ordinary Muslim's" taking to combat extremest Muslim's ?

[evli1966 88]

So what steps are all these "ordinary Muslim's" taking to combat extremest Muslim's ?

Some do.

Here is my assesment of posters here.

Soff is to defensive in regards to Islam and will denounce any facts given towards terror acts in the name of Islam. and states other religeons(christianity) is about violence acted out

Mad doesnt agree and will cry TOS

Dan and ready typically post alot of articles with very biased views

I try to walk the middle to learn but get grouped as a bigot becasue no posts in defence of the facts being presented by others are refuted except in statements of "Islam is peaceful" only a minority of Muslims are radical. I also offer I am of christian faith and will follow the truth.

Others of Muslim faith listening to the extreme defense of the Islamic faith calling everyone else a bigot or prejudice are feelign the fearmiongering caused by the extreme defenders of hte faith which bring no evidence to the table.

Regular muslims are propbaly afraid for their own lives due to the extremist killing muslims and the Political leaders being influenced by the Islamic clerics or extremists.

This is IMO.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

+1

-2 to Jenns pithy response

[SuperDuper! 230]

The eternal flame of Muslim outrage

by Michelle Malkin

http://michellemalki...muslim-outrage/

Shhhhhhh, we're told. Don't protest the Ground Zero mosque. Don't burn a Koran. It'll imperil the troops. It'll inflame tensions. The "Muslim world" will "explode" if it does not get its way, warns sharia-peddling imam Feisal Abdul Rauf. Pardon my national security-threatening impudence, but when is the "Muslim world" not ready to "explode"?

At the risk of provoking the ever-volatile Religion of Perpetual Outrage, let us count the little-noticed and forgotten ways.

Just a few months ago in Kashmir, faithful Muslims rioted over what they thought was a mosque depicted on underwear sold by street vendors. The mob shut down businesses and clashed with police over the blasphemous skivvies. But it turned out there was no need for Allah's avengers to get their holy knickers in a bunch. The alleged mosque was actually a building resembling London's St. Paul's Cathedral. A Kashmiri law enforcement official later concluded the protests were "premeditated and organized to vitiate the atmosphere."

Indeed, art and graphics have an uncanny way of vitiating the Muslim world's atmosphere. In 1994, Muslims threatened German supermodel Claudia Schiffer with death after she wore a Karl Lagerfeld-designed dress printed with a saying from the Koran.

In 1997, outraged Muslims forced Nike to recall 800,000 shoes because they claimed the company's "Air" logo looked like the Arabic script for "Allah." In 1998, another conflagration spread over Unilever's ice cream logo — which Muslims claimed looked like "Allah" if read upside-down and backward (can't recall what they said it resembled if you viewed it with 3D glasses).

Even more explosively, in 2002, an al-Qaida-linked jihadist cell plotted to blow up Bologna, Italy's Church of San Petronio because it displayed a 15th century fresco depicting Mohammed being tormented in the ninth circle of Hell. For years, Muslims had demanded that the art come down. Counterterrorism officials in Europe caught the would-be bombers on tape scouting out the church and exclaiming, "May Allah bring it all down. It will all come down."

That same year, Nigerian Muslims stabbed, bludgeoned or burned to death 200 people in protest of the Miss World beauty pageant — which they considered an affront to Allah. They shouted, "Allahu Akbar!" And "Down with beauty!" And "Miss World is sin!" Contest organizers fled out of fear of inflaming further destruction.

When Nigerian journalist Isioma Daniel joked that Mohammed would have approved of the pageant and that "in all honesty, he would probably have chosen a wife from among them," her newspaper rushed to print three retractions and apologies in a row. It didn't stop Muslim vigilantes from torching the newspaper's offices. A fatwa was issued on Daniel's life by a Nigerian official in the sharia-ruled state of Zamfara, who declared that "the blood of Isioma Daniel can be shed. It is abiding on all Muslims wherever they are to consider the killing of the writer as a religious duty." Daniel fled to Norway.

In 2005, British Muslims got all hot and bothered over a Burger King ice cream cone container whose swirly-texted label resembled, you guessed it, the Arabic script for "Allah." The restaurant chain yanked the product in a panic and prostrated itself before the Muslim world. But the fast-food dessert had already become a handy radical Islamic recruiting tool. Rashad Akhtar, a young British Muslim, told Harper's Magazine how the ice cream caper had inspired him: "Even though it means nothing to some people and may mean nothing to some Muslims in this country, this is my jihad. I'm not going to rest until I find the person who is responsible. I'm going to bring this country down."

In 2007, Muslims combusted again in Sudan after an infidel elementary school teacher innocently named a classroom teddy bear "Mohammed." Protesters chanted, "Kill her, kill her by firing squad!" and "No tolerance — execution!" She was arrested, jailed and faced 40 lashes for blasphemy before being freed after eight days. Not wanting to cause further inflammation, the teacher rushed to apologize: "I have great respect for the Islamic religion and would not knowingly offend anyone, and I am sorry if I caused any distress."

And who could forget the global Danish cartoon riots of 2006 (instigated by imams who toured Egypt stoking hysteria with faked anti-Islam comic strips)? From Afghanistan to Egypt to Lebanon to Libya, Pakistan, Turkey and in between, hundreds died under the pretext of protecting Mohammed from Western slight, and brave journalists who stood up to the madness were threatened with beheading. It wasn't really about the cartoons at all, of course. Little-remembered is the fact that Muslim bullies were attempting to pressure Denmark over the International Atomic Energy Agency's decision to report Iran to the UN Security Council for continuing with its nuclear research program. The chairmanship of the council was passing to Denmark at the time. Yes, it was just another in a long line of manufactured Muslim explosions that were, to borrow a useful phrase, "premeditated and organized to vitiate the atmosphere."

When everything from sneakers to stuffed animals to comics to frescos to beauty queens to fast-food packaging to undies serves as dry tinder for Allah's avengers, it's a grand farce to feign concern about the recruitment effect of a few burnt Korans in the hands of a two-bit attention-seeker in Florida. The eternal flame of Muslim outrage was lit a long, long time ago.

Danno, did you REALLY have to post this Topic?

There have been many muslim topics this week that have been VERY provocative. And your addition just feeds the flames here.

Really? So necessary at this time?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

It's trash and should be treated as such.

[Pooky 3,783]

It's trash and should be treated as such.

That's why it's in the Politics and Religion forum

Sorted!

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

The politics and religion forum is still bound by the tos.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

The politics and religion forum is still bound by the tos.

And it, including this thread, is monitored... Or does that factoid escape you too?

[Danno 1,228]

Danno, did you REALLY have to post this Topic?

There have been many muslim topics this week that have been VERY provocative. And your addition just feeds the flames here.

Really? So necessary at this time?

NO I did not have to post this piece this week but since it dealt with a recurring part of the conversation, namely...."How a segment of Muslims have reacted to offenses", I thought it would be helpful as MM dealt with this issue and itemized them.

I Think we are all big boys and Big Girls and able to dismiss her slant, mixed in with the facts if we don't agree with it.

Edited September 15, 2010 by Danno

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

And it, including this thread, is monitored... Or does that factoid escape you too?

If the thread has been reported...

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

NO I did not have to post this piece this week but since it dealt with a recurring part of the conversation, namely...."How a segment of Muslims have reacted to offenses", I thought it would be helpful as MM dealt with this issue and itemized them.

I Think we are all big boys and Big Girls and able to dismiss her slant, mixed in with the facts if we don't agree with it.

The article doesn't reference a "segment of Muslims". It deliberately generalises because the intent of the article is to appeal to people who think that Muslims, in general, are to blame for violent acts.

The facts supporting her story are irrelevant because they are being used to promote an agenda. It simply isn't possible to have a reasoned discussion using divisive, insulting propaganda as legitimate source material.

[Danno 1,228]

The article doesn't reference a "segment of Muslims". It deliberately generalises because the intent of the article is to appeal to people who think that Muslims, in general, are to blame for violent acts.

Why the silence from you when we have repeatedly heard the term "Catholic Priests" used when referring to those few boy molesters in their midst?