VJ's obsession with Muslims

[Heracles 417]

You throw out tangents. Never facts.

Are you of all people really going to make this accusation? 3/4 of your posts are sarcastic yet you are going to claim I misrepresent facts.

It's just funny how apart from these fabricated scenarios, not one of you shows me where I have incorrectly used facts. Your little FB group takes turns bringing it up once a month but always fails to show me where. When asked to do so, you just throw out some label or claim you have no time.

One again, where have I done or used the following

Normal Human Being: Many people have been convicted of the death penalty, only to have their innocence proven while on death row. In my opinion, this means a re-examination of the ethics of the death penalty is warranted.

Boo Yah: Here is a picture of the FBI's Most Wanted page. Here is a Google street view screenshot of the most notorious barrio in Los Angeles. See anything in common? And you want to let these people go?

Edited September 12, 2010 by Heracles

[Ban Hammer 13,340]

I don't assume. I know.

prove it then.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Yeah really. It's not rocket science BY. It's the opposite in fact.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Even when one considers the incidents of abuse that may have occurred, it was still a heep more humane than what was carried out by many Indian tribes ... one to another.

In fact I am still waiting for some group to condemn the American Indians for their practice of enslaving fellow humans.

That group wouldn't be the White American descendants of Black slave holders, I imagine.

[SuperDuper! 230]

BY using ethnic slurs doesn't prove that he's a racist any more than your being extremely

careful with words proves that you're not. For all we know, you could be the biggest racist

on the planet, just careful not to get caught.

Mark is about the only one being fair and balanced right about now. Meanwhile, Pike is reloading, or just trying to keep up the defense. Good luck with that....

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

prove it then.

I should dig out the post where you said that you saved VJ content offline (a blatant violation of tos)?

I know you said it and so do you. I don't expect you to be honest in your reply.

[Heracles 417]

If you use racial slurs "in direct rebuttal," its still a racial slur and using it still makes you a racist.

What your saying is if something offends you, then we should shut up about it. Yet because you deem personal insults acceptable, then they should and can be used.

It's why you guys had a hissy-fit in the site discussion section. Your little brain still does not grasp that both are an insult. Therefore, either both are ruled out or both are acceptable.

Edited September 12, 2010 by Heracles

[mawilson 2,133]

If you use racial slurs "in direct rebuttal," its still a racial slur and using it still makes you a racist.

No, it doesn't. People use racial slurs to offend, not because they are racist.

If you piss me off, I might call you a curry-muncher. Does it mean that I hate

Indians or Indian food? Absolutely not.

[Ban Hammer 13,340]

I should dig out the post where you said that you saved VJ content offline (a blatant violation of tos)?

I know you said it and so do you. I don't expect you to be honest in your reply.

already stated - prove it. until you can get into my computer, you don't have squat for proof.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Mark is about the only one being fair and balanced right about now. Meanwhile, Pike is reloading, or just trying to keep up the defense. Good luck with that....

And you're just a hanger on.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

You mean like educated civilized people who ignore grotesque atrocities, simply because not all do it.

I'd like to see someone close to you or even you end up a victim of some heinous crime and then for people to say who cares, not all do it. Perhaps, your type needs to end up on the opposite end of the stick before you wake up.

I am not one of those, I don't need to end up a victim or dead to realize, there are people who want us dead, solely because of our beliefs or lack of. And these people are not isolated nutters burning books, but thousands of fanatics who actually believe they are carrying out Allah's work.

Some of us are just balancing out your overdoing it by not being as fanatical as you are. I'm curious, would it really matter to you what someone believes when they kill you?

[Heracles 417]

Yeah really. It's not rocket science BY. It's the opposite in fact.

Right, so it's okay to throw out baseless broad-based labels about a member but not okay to summarize points using actual data.

Edited September 12, 2010 by Heracles

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

already stated - prove it. until you can get into my computer, you don't have squat for proof.

So your word isn't proof? What are you trying to say here?

[Ban Hammer 13,340]

So your word isn't proof? What are you trying to say here?

funny you should mention your word as proof.

[Heracles 417]

Some of us are just balancing out your overdoing it by not being as fanatical as you are. I'm curious, would it really matter to you what someone believes when they kill you?

Sofiyya please, it's time to give it a rest. We need to agree to disagree, which I know is hard for you. Just saying..

I need to have my regular battle with the challenged members on here. It helps exercise the brain using futile discussions and keep Alzheimers away.

Edited September 12, 2010 by Heracles