VJ's obsession with Muslims

[^_^ 5,021]

In what context? Or does it matter?

It's ancient history. It doesn't really matter (to me) except it's still really funny.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Conservatives want racism to be respectable again. This is why they don't like you pointing this stuff out as if it's a bad thing. They want it to be a good thing again just like in the good ol' days they oh so pine for.

Aye. We're now at the point where they have expressed racist ideas for so long that they find the allegation of racism to be cliche, as if that automatically makes it untrue.

"Like you can talk, your spouse is from Mexico"

"...your inca bowl cut family"

Racist? Oh no, not at all.

[^_^ 5,021]

Aye. We're now at the point where they have expressed racist ideas for so long that they find the allegation of racism to be cliche, as if that automatically makes it untrue.

"Like you can talk, your spouse is from Mexico"

"...your inca bowl cut family"

Racist? Oh no, not at all.

If fellow conservatives think it's cool then it can't be racist.

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Conservatives want racism to be respectable again. This is why they don't like you pointing this stuff out as if it's a bad thing. They want it to be a good thing again just like in the good ol' days they oh so pine for.

Deluxe RACE CARD! All conservatives are RACIST? This is the kind of thing that happens when desperation strikes. Its really quite appalling.

[^_^ 5,021]

Deluxe RACE CARD! All conservatives are RACIST? This is the kind of thing that happens when desperation strikes. Its really quite appalling.

Report it. Look for the word appalling in TOS.

[Heracles 417]

Conservatives want racism to be respectable again. This is why they don't like you pointing this stuff out as if it's a bad thing. They want it to be a good thing again just like in the good ol' days they oh so pine for.

And liberals deem any topic they are unable to participate in using rational discusison [let alone facts] as racism, bigotry etc etc etc.

Had you guys at least owned me a few times, I might have shut up. Yet the more facts I threw out, the more personal you got and the more you avoided facts yourself. You kept on moving the goal posts though, which actually makes posting fun. The latest challenges is they 'not all do it, therefore, all is okay' rhetoric and answer to everything; and I mean everything.

Edited September 12, 2010 by Heracles

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

In what context? Or does it matter?

In the context that BY thinks he is Frank Castle, The Punisher.

[Ban Hammer 13,469]

I think we can take your word for that Charles, since you keep "records" of such things

assumption about things again? tsk tsk, you shouldn't assume so much.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I don't assume. I know.

[^_^ 5,021]

And liberals deem any discussion they are unable to participate in using rational discusison let alone facts as racism, bigotry etc etc etc.

Had you guys at least owned me a few times, I might have shut up. Yet the more facts I threw out, the more personal you got and the more you avoided facts yourself. You kept on moving the goal posts though, which actually makes posting fun. The latest challenges though is they 'not all do it, therefore, all is okay' rhetoric.

You throw out tangents. Never facts.

Here's an example of talking to Boo Yah.

Normal Human Being:

Many people have been convicted of the death penalty, only to have their innocence proven while on death row. In my opinion, this means a re-examination of the ethics of the death penalty is warranted.

Boo Yah:

Here is a picture of the FBI's Most Wanted page. Here is a Google street view screenshot of the most notorious barrio in Los Angeles. See anything in common? And you want to let these people go?

[Peikko 1,575]

Not one thing that I have posted supports this new view that you have taken to spouting that I think terrorism is 'ok'. Terrorism is NOT OK. I have never, ever suggested that it was ok, or that it is a valid tool to further a political agenda. Where you go wrong BY is to think that the 'muslim' aspect of the terrorists that you are currently focusing on is pertinent or germane to the politics of the situation. It simply isn't, no matter what you think about it.

Edited September 12, 2010 by Madame Cleo

[mawilson 2,133]

You are racist, BY. If you weren't why would you use ethnic slurs against other posters?

BY using ethnic slurs doesn't prove that he's a racist any more than your being extremely

careful with words proves that you're not. For all we know, you could be the biggest racist

on the planet, just careful not to get caught.

[Heracles 417]

Aye. We're now at the point where they have expressed racist ideas for so long that they find the allegation of racism to be cliche, as if that automatically makes it untrue.

"Like you can talk, your spouse is from Mexico"

"...your inca bowl cut family"

Racist? Oh no, not at all.

So you really are a disingenuous cunning ####### but have the nerve to call Mark immoral. At least he does not try to hide under this sanctimonious bullcrap. You are not fooling no one here mate; perhaps these morons that share your views, but that is about it.

The 2.5 year old insult was in direct rebuttal, and we know how much you love rebutting, to a barrage of other personal insults. Yet as per usual, the second I get personal myself, you guys don't like how the game is played now and get offended.

[^_^ 5,021]

So you really are a disingenuous cunning ####### but have the nerve to call Mark immoral. At least he does not try to hide under this sanctimonious bullcrap. You are not fooling no one here mate; perhaps these morons that share your views, but that is about it.

The 2.5 year old insult was in direct rebuttal, and we know how much you love rebutting, to a barrage of other personal insults. Yet as per usual, the second I get personal myself, you guys don't like how the game is played now and get offended.

If you use racial slurs "in direct rebuttal," its still a racial slur and using it still makes you a racist.

[Peikko 1,575]

I am not sure if Mark is amoral, but he is certainly a nihilist - or as near as one can get based on the things he has posted. I am sure he has a moral code, but it is not based on any religious credo.