Jump to content
elmcitymaven

The new "banning from thread" action

 Share

86 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline

Context, in the bigger picture Rob & Mel. Read AJ's excellent response above.

That is immaterial to an accusation lobbed in my direction. That may be his rationale, but not mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

That is immaterial to an accusation lobbed in my direction. That may be his rationale, but not mine.

This is an important point. Rob and I don't coordinate our actions. We don't have a secret command center set up or anything like that. It's all fairly spontaneous and each of us has our own reasons for doing what we do (and don't do).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is immaterial to an accusation lobbed in my direction. That may be his rationale, but not mine.

Yes, believe it or not we are separate individuals and have separate motivations for our posts.

larissa-lima-says-who-is-against-the-que

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is immaterial to an accusation lobbed in my direction. That may be his rationale, but not mine.

Here is the example for you:

Seeing as there is no clear definition of ####### this thread is about, I'll go with the interpretation that makes sense to me.

Whose Next To Take a Dump

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the example for you:

And that example proves what? That Rob guessed at the rules and got them sort of right? I say sort of, since AJ is not a member of the Golden Circle allowed to post in that thread.

larissa-lima-says-who-is-against-the-que

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline

Here is the example for you:

In the absence of any directive as to what the rules and expected conduct of the game, what am I supposed to assume? I was having some fun, thats not an insult, nor is it a violation of TOS. Context William, remember?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I in an alternate universe? I can totally see why Wm would think this could be a coordinated attack. That said - I bet some of the posters in that thread know exactly what a staged attack might look like - since they themselves used to partake in such fun!

Please, do tell! :whistle:

Sign-on-a-church-af.jpgLogic-af.jpgwwiao.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Ok I found the rules

From Jenn's first thread:

Not sure if this will catch on, but thought I'd give it a try. Rules are simple. You have to guess who will post after you. If you're right, you get a point. I will post a tally for scores.

Edited by Legacy member
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Do I get a wedgie?
You rang, si man?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also posted in there...but I didn't get the memo to join in on the staged 'attack' :lol: :lol: I blame Maven, I only went in there because I saw she had posted, I shall refrain from being enticed into threads by her from now on!

Seriously though, threads are derailed every day on OT...is it like something really important might be missed through a small derailment of this particular 'topic'?....the thought of people being banned from such a frivolous thread is hilarious :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also posted in there...but I didn't get the memo to join in on the staged 'attack' :lol: :lol: I blame Maven, I only went in there because I saw she had posted, I shall refrain from being enticed into threads by her from now on!

Seriously though, threads are derailed every day on OT...is it like something really important might be missed through a small derailment of this particular 'topic'?....the thought of people being banned from such a frivolous thread is hilarious :lol:

Woot woot! I lured the esteemed Welshie into bad behaviour -- truly, my elevation to Legacy Member is now complete.luv.gif

Didn't you know that everything now has the potential to be derailed? I mean, I could easily derail this topic if I liked, AND I could call for it to be closed and invisibilised if I chose (as the OP, natch). To that end, I have GOT to tell you about the next weird date I had, just this past Saturday. I mean, nowhere near as crazy as the previous Friday night's HJ humiliation spectacular, but still kinda sauceh. ;)

Oh wait, am I derailing again?unsure.gif

larissa-lima-says-who-is-against-the-que

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...