Reporting - who's doing it.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

stop micromanaging me, if I want to explain, I will.

Also, if you'll notice, I explained WHY I explained. For you. And those like you who look for the perceived insult to whine about in every sodding thing on here lately

Micromanaging - that's the buzzword of the moment is it?

It's quite obvious what you did - you hopped in here so you could thumb your nose at MC in passing. Why else would you mention it?

[Fandango 1,439]

Micromanaging - that's the buzzword of the moment is it?

It's quite obvious what you did - you hopped in here so you could thumb your nose at MC in passing. Why else would you mention it?

Well stop doing it and I won't have to say it all of the two times I said it today.

Furthermore, would you be making this hoo ha if someone came in and said 'I reported BY for calling a hispanic person a GRINGO!'

No, you wouldn't. But you're jumping on my sh!t because it's NOT someone you loathe.

I'll say it one more time for the reading challenged...I explained why because I NORMALLY don't agree with reporting anyone for anything...I've always been very 'no need for mod' here. But that was the exception. And guess what? It's germane to the conversation...even the OP/ person I reported says explanations are FINE.

So why are your panties in such a bunch? Mind you, none of this has anything to do with you, but I guess it's time for you to flip flop back from fighting with BY to fighting with me.

Edited August 22, 2010 by Happy Bunny

[SMOKE 1,426]

did i mention i happy bunny?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Well stop doing it and I won't have to say it all of the two times I said it today.

Furthermore, would you be making this hoo ha if someone came in and said 'I reported BY for calling a hispanic person a GRINGO!'

No, you wouldn't. But you're jumping on my sh!t because it's NOT someone you loathe.

I'll say it one more time for the reading challenged...I explained why because I NORMALLY don't agree with reporting anyone for anything...I've always been very 'no need for mod' here. But that was the exception. And guess what? It's germane to the conversation...even the OP/ person I reported says explanations are FINE.

So why are your panties in such a bunch? Mind you, none of this has anything to do with you, but I guess it's time for you to flip flop back from fighting with BY to fighting with me.

Lisa, I'm not using emotive language - you are. Nor am I shouting.

Panties in a bunch? Really? is that the level of conversation you want to have?

We can argue all day about personal motives - suffice to say you have them (they are on display in this thread and the other one in OT) as indeed do I. You don't have to agree.

[Fandango 1,439]

did i mention i happy bunny?

right back atcha

[Peikko 1,575]

I am fine with Lisa saying what she said, obviously it is something she believes needed to be said. That being the case, Lisa, did you report my use of n*gger because you thought I was being racist, or simply because you don't think the word should be used in any context at all?

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

1. Yes

2. Pervert

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

1. Yes

2. Pervert

[Fandango 1,439]

Lisa, I'm not using emotive language - you are. Nor am I shouting.

Panties in a bunch? Really? is that the level of conversation you want to have?

We can argue all day about personal motives - suffice to say you have them (they are on display in this thread and the other one in OT) as indeed do I. You don't have to agree.

Panties in a bunch. Really.

Guess what? Let's take a guess to see who is more qualified to speak about *my* personal motives. Oh wait, that's right, it's ME.

I'm not shouting, I'm emphasizing. I am pretty darned tired of every single thread turning into a stupid p!ssing contest between the 'usual suspects'. Especially when it's speculative and WRONG.

Furthermore, if I tell you that I wasn't being aggressive, then I wasn't. I'm not a wuss, never have been. If I want to be aggressive, I will. And I'll make no bones about it. You've known me for how long? I'm about as subtle as a mack truck, and when I have a problem with something, I don't leave any room for question. I think we can agree on that.

I am fine with Lisa saying what she said, obviously it is something she believes needed to be said. That being the case, Lisa, did you report my use of n*gger because you thought I was being racist, or simply because you don't think the word should be used in any context at all?

I reported you because I felt you were using it for shock value, when it didn't need to be used at all to get your point across.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Panties in a bunch. Really.

Guess what? Let's take a guess to see who is more qualified to speak about *my* personal motives. Oh wait, that's right, it's ME.

I'm not shouting, I'm emphasizing. I am pretty darned tired of every single thread turning into a stupid p!ssing contest between the 'usual suspects'. Especially when it's speculative and WRONG.

Furthermore, if I tell you that I wasn't being aggressive, then I wasn't. I'm not a wuss, never have been. If I want to be aggressive, I will. And I'll make no bones about it. You've known me for how long? I'm about as subtle as a mack truck, and when I have a problem with something, I don't leave any room for question. I think we can agree on that.

No we don't agree. Sorry.

[Peikko 1,575]

Panties in a bunch. Really.

Guess what? Let's take a guess to see who is more qualified to speak about *my* personal motives. Oh wait, that's right, it's ME.

I'm not shouting, I'm emphasizing. I am pretty darned tired of every single thread turning into a stupid p!ssing contest between the 'usual suspects'. Especially when it's speculative and WRONG.

Furthermore, if I tell you that I wasn't being aggressive, then I wasn't. I'm not a wuss, never have been. If I want to be aggressive, I will. And I'll make no bones about it. You've known me for how long? I'm about as subtle as a mack truck, and when I have a problem with something, I don't leave any room for question. I think we can agree on that.

I reported you because I felt you were using it for shock value, when it didn't need to be used at all to get your point across.

Fair enough - I don't agree but I do see why you think that.

[Fandango 1,439]

Fair enough - I don't agree but I do see why you think that.

And had you used it just once, I probably would have overlooked it and not done anything. But you used it so much you made me break my rule of never reporting anyone *shakes fist*

No we don't agree. Sorry.

lol how silly of me, of course we don't.

[Peikko 1,575]

And had you used it just once, I probably would have overlooked it and not done anything. But you used it so much you made me break my rule of never reporting anyone *shakes fist*

lol how silly of me, of course we don't.

I certainly apologise for your having to break your rule. Obviously I got a little carried away at the time. If memory serves the post was redacted - I don't remember any other action being taken.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Didn't the thread about Dr. Laura Schlessinger have a multiple "n*gger" quote in it?

[Peikko 1,575]

Didn't the thread about Dr. Laura Schlessinger have a multiple "n*gger" quote in it?

This thread seems to be infamous, but yet I don't remember it at all.

Maybe Lisa didn't post in that thread? There are many that I don't read and I get really miffed when people take me to task for not posting in a thread that I didn't even read.

Edited August 22, 2010 by Madame Cleo