Jump to content

146 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
is this because rob & I discussed pink? :lol:
Even if I didn't care for pink, I would respect the opinion of someone who did, si man. :)

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted

Unless "some members are more equal than others," I'm as entitled to weigh in on it as is anyone. The issue is not whether it's wrong for legacy members to post; it's the nature and (more often) the tone. This is the Site Discussion forum. Read the title of this thread, and please ask yourself how the tone of your post (quoted here) fits or belies this thread's title.

Please name three people, or two, or one, in OT about whom I have expressed dislike. Do it now, in this thread.

Your question was provocative because it suggested that there was something sinister in the fact that people continue to post when they are no longer actively involved in the immigration process. I am quite entitled to tell you that your question was intrusive.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
Anyone who thinks BY has a point should look at how many threads he has derailed or attempted to derail with this garbage.
Perhaps this proves some statements by others that the message is overlooked because of the messenger. We can pretend that this thread was started by Jim Smith (purportedly the most common name in the U.S.) and focus on the title.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted

Bingo - I reported an example of this, the fist and last time I'll bother probably because no one appears to be able to discern a quite obvious pattern of behaviour judging by the action that was taken on the issue - nothing - unless the mods are still cogitating on the issue because it is so complex.

Your inference is that the mods are stupid. This is an illogical extrapolation and also offense to smart thinking people. Please explain your statement. :unsure:

Sign-on-a-church-af.jpgLogic-af.jpgwwiao.gif

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted (edited)

The message is invalid when the messenger is one of, if not the worst offender.

You can of course look at his post history, if you care to. He is obsessed with a handful of posters on this site and routinely does, unprovoked what he has accused others of doing.

Edited by Its a MADHOUSE
Posted

The message is invalid when the messenger is one of, if not the worst offender.

You can of course look at his post history, if you care to. He is obsessed with a handful of posters on this site and routinely does, unprovoked what he has accused others of doing.

Are you for real? Name once when I followed you or any one of your like-minded buddies around for the sole purpose of attacking you. While you have improved this year, you have a notorious history of entering threads and posting for the sake of ridiculing the poster. Pretty-much every conservative has been a target of this at one time or another. Like the latest member of the group, you guys get a kick out of discussing and insulting the poster.

Anyways, that was the past, this is now. The problem now is this scheme you and your buddies have going on against the mods. Pulling an Alex style fit over even the smallest thing. Even when the moderation was skewed in your favor, I accepted the mods decisions. I didn't come here and stomp like a child any let alone every change I could.

You guys are making us legacy members look like fools, with this constant bickering over mod decisions. Get over it.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Once again, I do wish we'd drop this "love it or leave it" argument. It's an easy one to make, I grant you, but completely irrelevant.

Still...9 pages and not a single invocation of Godwin's Law. For VJ, that's like free rainbows and puppy dogs.

Posted (edited)

Once again, I do wish we'd drop this "love it or leave it" argument. It's an easy one to make, I grant you, but completely irrelevant.

Still...9 pages and not a single invocation of Godwin's Law. For VJ, that's like free rainbows and puppy dogs.

Why is that so hard to grasp? We don't have right to this forum. Ewok can kick us or close it down at a second notice.

Instead of people camping out and bitching about what they don't like about it then move on as many have. Especially anyone who is bitching about comments said in OT. OT is not VJ's main focus. What happens in OT is really irrelevant in the scope of this site. Had this site been about off-topic things, then such discussions are warranted.

Ewok probably wants to hear suggestion on improving VJ immigration wise, not bitching about people they dislike or mods in OT.

Edited by Heracles

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Why is that so hard to grasp? We don't have right to this forum. Ewok can kick us or close it down at a second notice.

Then let Ewok do the kicking or closing. In the meantime, "love it or leave it" is a fallacy and eliminates all helpful conversation.

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

I'd be more inclined to believe the OP has honest intentions if he, for once, was prepared to acknowledge his own behaviour rather than make up conspiracy theories about victimization. We've had threads of this nature before and they change very little at the end of the day because for some people the drama is a bigger draw than actual discussion topics. You can decide for yourselves where BY fits into that equation.

Posted (edited)

I'd be more inclined to believe the OP has honest intentions if he, for once, was prepared to acknowledge his own behaviour rather than make up conspiracy theories about victimization. We've had threads of this nature before and they change very little at the end of the day because for some people the drama is a bigger draw than actual discussion topics. You can decide for yourselves where BY fits into that equation.

Why is it every time anyone outside this mob has an opinion about their experience, they are either playing the victim or whining? Yet strangely enough it was your mate who created a thread about a word I used. You don't even have the decency to apologize for something you accused me of doing, yet were proven wrong.

I have not denied my actions mate. In fact, it's you guys who are denying your actions, as you have done so in three to four threads now.

You also have a hard time grasping that what offends you guys may not offend the rest of us. Yet what offends us clearly does not offend you, that's apparently "petty name calling". You also have no issue with bringing up comments, again and again, from three to five years ago, and expect the rest of us should accept it too.

Edited by Heracles

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...