Legacy Posters stirring trouble

[SuperDuper! 230]

Bingo - I reported an example of this, the fist and last time I'll bother probably because no one appears to be able to discern a quite obvious pattern of behaviour judging by the action that was taken on the issue - nothing - unless the mods are still cogitating on the issue because it is so complex.

Your inference is that the mods are stupid. This is an illogical extrapolation and also offense to smart thinking people. Please explain your statement.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

The message is invalid when the messenger is one of, if not the worst offender.

You can of course look at his post history, if you care to. He is obsessed with a handful of posters on this site and routinely does, unprovoked what he has accused others of doing.

Edited August 23, 2010 by Its a MADHOUSE

[Heracles 417]

The message is invalid when the messenger is one of, if not the worst offender.

You can of course look at his post history, if you care to. He is obsessed with a handful of posters on this site and routinely does, unprovoked what he has accused others of doing.

Are you for real? Name once when I followed you or any one of your like-minded buddies around for the sole purpose of attacking you. While you have improved this year, you have a notorious history of entering threads and posting for the sake of ridiculing the poster. Pretty-much every conservative has been a target of this at one time or another. Like the latest member of the group, you guys get a kick out of discussing and insulting the poster.

Anyways, that was the past, this is now. The problem now is this scheme you and your buddies have going on against the mods. Pulling an Alex style fit over even the smallest thing. Even when the moderation was skewed in your favor, I accepted the mods decisions. I didn't come here and stomp like a child any let alone every change I could.

You guys are making us legacy members look like fools, with this constant bickering over mod decisions. Get over it.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Name once!? You do it all the time!!! Just yesterday you hijacked at least 3 other threads in this part of the forum to continue your personal vendetta, including one dedicated to welcoming a new moderator.

Get over yourself, for fucks sake.

[Heracles 417]

Once again, I do wish we'd drop this "love it or leave it" argument. It's an easy one to make, I grant you, but completely irrelevant.

Still...9 pages and not a single invocation of Godwin's Law. For VJ, that's like free rainbows and puppy dogs.

Why is that so hard to grasp? We don't have right to this forum. Ewok can kick us or close it down at a second notice.

Instead of people camping out and bitching about what they don't like about it then move on as many have. Especially anyone who is bitching about comments said in OT. OT is not VJ's main focus. What happens in OT is really irrelevant in the scope of this site. Had this site been about off-topic things, then such discussions are warranted.

Ewok probably wants to hear suggestion on improving VJ immigration wise, not bitching about people they dislike or mods in OT.

Edited August 23, 2010 by Heracles

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I'd be more inclined to believe the OP has honest intentions if he, for once, was prepared to acknowledge his own behaviour rather than make up conspiracy theories about victimization. We've had threads of this nature before and they change very little at the end of the day because for some people the drama is a bigger draw than actual discussion topics. You can decide for yourselves where BY fits into that equation.

[Heracles 417]

I'd be more inclined to believe the OP has honest intentions if he, for once, was prepared to acknowledge his own behaviour rather than make up conspiracy theories about victimization. We've had threads of this nature before and they change very little at the end of the day because for some people the drama is a bigger draw than actual discussion topics. You can decide for yourselves where BY fits into that equation.

Why is it every time anyone outside this mob has an opinion about their experience, they are either playing the victim or whining? Yet strangely enough it was your mate who created a thread about a word I used. You don't even have the decency to apologize for something you accused me of doing, yet were proven wrong.

I have not denied my actions mate. In fact, it's you guys who are denying your actions, as you have done so in three to four threads now.

You also have a hard time grasping that what offends you guys may not offend the rest of us. Yet what offends us clearly does not offend you, that's apparently "petty name calling". You also have no issue with bringing up comments, again and again, from three to five years ago, and expect the rest of us should accept it too.

Edited August 23, 2010 by Heracles

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Noone was proven wrong BY. You are one of the worst troublemakers on these boards but you'd rather pin the blame on everyone else rather than admit that you are responsible for much of what you are complaining about.

You won't even meet anyone halfway, what exactly are you expecting from people when all you bring to the party is wild hysterics?

[Heracles 417]

Noone was proven wrong BY. You are one of the worst troublemakers on these boards but you'd rather pin the blame on everyone else rather than admit that you are responsible for much of what you are complaining about.

You won't even meet anyone halfway, what exactly are you expecting from people when all you bring to the party is wild hysterics?

Yes she was proven wrong, both you and her claimed I used the word in a derogatory manner, yet two years earlier I used the same word and even included brackets defining its intended meaning.

Everyone you disagree with is some sort of trouble maker; therefore, you clearly feel this gives you the right to follow them around and disrupt anything they post. In fact, you are doing it now.

Edited August 23, 2010 by Heracles

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

You did use the word in your derogatory manner. Do you think it would be perceived to be innocent if I started responding to black vjers in a street dialect?

Why would you do that?

[Heracles 417]

Pike your persistence on here illustrates you have a hard time accepting differing views. You have a history of arguing people's views.

I cannot even discuss my experience without you arguing it. It's my experience, hence nothing to rebut.

Edited August 23, 2010 by Heracles

[Jenn! 918]

O.M.G.

[Marilyn. 340]

O.M.G.

do you feel like pulling your hair out too ??

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Oh I'm there too. It doesn't matter what anyone says, BY will completely ignore it and just say the same thing over and over and over again.

Is he genuinely interested in a more polite, reasonable VJ? On balance of performance, I really don't think so.

[Rebecca Jo 1,962]

I have the perfect example of this, for whatever reason Cleo is outraged over my use of gringo, when it was clearly in jest. Because she assumed it was negative to an entire group, apparently this is now worse than the holocaust. Hateful, offensive and so forth.

Yet strange how she had no issue with her buddy Pike referring to Natty's kids. Now I understand what pike meant but that is not the point. Natty was infuriated about his toddlers being used to mock him, which is perfectly understandable. Yet to Pike, Cleo, A.J and co, as long as you don't group people, such insults are no big deal.

No those insults are a ###### big deal as they are personal. Not even your mum style personal but actually offensive personal. Yet ironically Pike went on and Cleo said nothing about this because they did not deem this offensive. That is the hypocrisy I cannot stand with these guys, who come on here with this sanctimonious attitude. Come here and pretend they want peace and serenity. Bullcrap, they want the old VJ moderation back, when comments like that would slide yet Natty would be suspended for understandably threatening Pike.

If you say something that you didn't mean to be offensive, but someone else is offended by it, why don't you just explain (briefly), apologize and shut up?

I bet the fire would be out in a hurry.