Legacy Posters stirring trouble

[Heracles 417]

So far - the only person making personal attacks is you. You're also the one attempting to hijacking threads just so you can have an argument. It's very obvious what you're doing.

Your reposes here thus far prove you have an issue with those of us with differing views. Proves that unless you and cleo deem something worthy of discussion then it's [insert label]

Label: Racist, bigoted, ignorant, stupid, fabricated, hate, xenophobic, whining, bitching, crying, etc etc etc. I have honestly lost county of the 50+ labels I have been insulted with over the years from you and your mates.

As I asked earlier, show me how man times I have enter a thread you or your mates are in and just off-the-bat insulted them for their views. For me to list the examples, Ewok would need to duplicate VJ's server space. And that is just me, now add in Shooter and so forth.

Edited August 22, 2010 by Heracles

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I thought you weren't interested in old grudges, BY.

What is the purpose of this thread? So far it seems to be to antagonise and make personal attacks.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Label: Racist, bigoted, ignorant, stupid, fabricated, hate, xenophobic, whining, bitching, crying, etc etc etc. I have honestly lost county of the 50+ labels I have been insulted with over the years from you and your mates.

Anyone who is interested can do a keyword search for "Inca" under your name and decide for themselves if any of those labels are apt.

[Heracles 417]

Anyone who is interested can do a keyword search for "Inca" under your name and decide for themselves if any of those labels are apt.

How is Inca offensive? It's describing a group pf people who lived in a region. Like calling you Anglo Saxon.

Nevertheless, thanks for illustrating two points again. First bringing up the past. Second, ignoring the reason for its use, like after an ambush of personal insults. Much along the lines of Cleo's mindset, being ambushed by posters does not warrant fighting back does it - it's fun right. You just have to sit there and accept the insults. Just don't use someone's background, as that is offensive in your book.

That's your rules mate, not mine. My rules back then were you ambush me, then you get attacked back and at any level.

Clearly you and your buds want the rules of the game changed back to suit you. It all makes sense. It's why Cleo has no problem with insults and only views them as childish, as it allows you guys to attack people; as you did in the past.

Edited August 22, 2010 by Heracles

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

You initiated this "exchange", noone else. You brought up the past, I don't see why I can't.

As I say, other posters can decide for themselves if it's offensive.

BTW - Modern day Mexicans are not "Inca", just as Britons aren't Anglo-Saxon. The Anglo Saxon nation was effectively destroyed after William 1 beat King Harold at the Battle of Hastings.

[HappyKnappy 30]

Label: Racist, bigoted, ignorant, stupid, fabricated, hate, xenophobic, whining, bitching, crying, etc etc etc. I have honestly lost county of the 50+ labels I have been insulted with over the years from you and your mates.

And you think it's an insult rather than the truth?

[HappyKnappy 30]

You initiated this "exchange", noone else. You brought up the past, I don't see why I can't.

As I say, other posters can decide for themselves if it's offensive.

BTW - Modern day Mexicans are not "Inca", just as Britons aren't Anglo-Saxon. The Anglo Saxon nation was effectively destroyed after William 1 beat King Harold at the Battle of Hastings.

Sorry, buddy. I see your point, but I want to make sure that we have facts going straight, to avoid further logistic complications. The Incas were settled way south, like Peru and Bolivia. We had Aztecs, Mayas, Zapotecs, Olmecs, etc.

[Heracles 417]

Sorry, buddy. I see your point, but I want to make sure that we have facts going straight, to avoid further logistic complications. The Incas were settled way south, like Peru and Bolivia. We had Aztecs, Mayas, Zapotecs, Olmecs, etc.

The must have been before the Spanish colonization. Spanish were just shocked to see people still building Pyramid type structures. We had done that a good two thousand years earlier.

[Heracles 417]

And you think it's an insult rather than the truth?

Insults and labels are way easier than actual discussions. Why discuss an issue when you can just call someone a bigot and that be the end of it.

Pike, Cleo and yourself are going to get along like a house on fire.

[HappyKnappy 30]

Insults and labels are way easier than actual discussions. Why discuss an issue when you can just call someone a bigot and that be the end of it.

Pike, Cleo and yourself are going to get along like a house on fire.

Goodie! Friends!!! You should try and get some too...

[HappyKnappy 30]

The must have been before the Spanish colonization. Spanish were just shocked to see people still building Pyramid type structures. We had done that a good two thousand years earlier.

At least we didn't get used as a bigger version of Alcatraz, in a more recent era... just saying.

Edited August 22, 2010 by HappyKnappy

[Ban Hammer 13,469]

Wouldn't this thread fall in the category of a legacy member stirring up trouble?

i just blame aj.

[Brad and Vika 129]

i just blame aj.

But lest you forget Charles, you are the one ruining the internet for all of us

Seriously folks - differing opinions are fine, but the personal attacks need to stop or we will have to lock the thread down. Start by not sniping at members (by name) who are not posting here, or who have chosen to nnot be part of this conversation.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Shouldn't this be in OT rather than Site Related Discussion?

[Heracles 417]

Shouldn't this be in OT rather than Site Related Discussion?

No it's now actually. Every second day either Cleo, A.J, Scandal or yourself have some issue with the moderation. Which, yet gain, warrants the question, if you have such a beef with it or the site, why do you guys camp out on here? Furthermore, why should VJ ban members you or your mates dislike, simply because they have an opinion about something you do not agree with or YOU deem offensive? For example, just because you feel discussing illegal immigration is irrelevant, should not mean any posters who do care are promoting hate, racism or bigotry; which is your answer to everything.

Judging by the systemic - almost planned - show you guys are putting on weekly and have put on for months on here, EP and in private, you are clearly trying to pull the old the squeakiest wheel gets the most attention.

I personally think the new and vastly improved moderation is not only objective but quite fair. It's not as if I have not received my fair share of timeouts.