Politics, Not Science, Drove White House to Release Rosy Gulf Oil Report

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s controversial report on the Gulf oil spill was not finished when the White House chose to release it, a government scientist told congressional investigators.

The Obama administration hyped the estimates at an Aug. 4 press briefing with White House energy czar Carol Browner and NOAA Administrator Jane Lubchenco. The report immediately sparked controversy among scientists for the rosy projection that three-quarters of the oil in the Gulf of Mexico had disappeared.

Bill Lehr, a senior scientist at NOAA and an author of the report, told congressional investigators that data supporting the study is still unavailable and the peer review remains unfinished. Lehr also said the decision to release the report was made by the White House, not the government’s lead science agency for oil spills.

A spokesman for NOAA did not respond to a request for comment.

The government report instantly made headlines for the astonishing conclusion that approximately 75 percent of the oil had been collected, burned, skimmed or simply disappeared. Given the magnitude of the spill — the worst environmental disaster in U.S. history — some scientists concluded it was premature to draw such conclusions.

Another independent study released this week estimated as much as 79 percent of the oil remains in the Gulf, beneath the water’s surface.

Lehr’s admission that the peer review wasn’t completed in advance of the report’s release undermines the administration’s claim that it was. In fact, his boss at NOAA first made the statement at the White House’s Aug. 4 briefing.

“The report was produced by scientific experts from a number of different agencies, federal agencies, with peer review of the calculations that went into this by both other federal and non-federal scientists,” Lubchenco said.

Browner, who would go on NBC’s “Meet the Press” days later to trumpet the report, echoed Lubchenco’s comments.

“This has all been — as Dr. Lubchenco said — been subjected to a scientific protocol, which means you peer review, peer review and peer review,” Browner said. “You look at what the inputs are. You look at what the models are. All of this has been made available.”

http://biggovernment.com/rbluey/2010/08/20/politics-not-science-drove-white-house-to-release-rosy-gulf-oil-report/#more-159273

[chri'stina 190]

Of course it was political.

[^_^ 5,021]

NPR: Giant Oil Plume Found Below Surface Of Gulf

August 20, 2010

Scientists have mapped out, for the first time, the underwater path that some petrochemicals took after gushing from BP's oil well in the Gulf of Mexico. It's an important new piece in a huge scientific puzzle.

Researchers are trying to figure out where as much as half of the spilled oil has gone.

Christopher Reddy, a co-author of the study released Thursday by the journal Science, says it was a big surprise when scientists first reported that large amounts of oil and oil compounds were staying underwater rather than rising to the surface.

"If you’d asked me — and I've been studying oil spills for 15 years — whether or not you would see oil in the subsurface, I would have said, 'No — doesn't oil float?' " he said at a news conference Thursday.

The phenomenon is fascinating but also troublesome, he says, because if scientists don't know where the oil is, they also don't know what harm it may be causing.

[HAL 9000 96]

Obviously political.

[BobandXiaomei 14]

Yes, it was political and smell like sh*t when I heard it on the radio last week. I just knew that couldn't be right.