Married on WWP in 2009

[Nina and Erwin 16]

Hi everyone

I have tried to find posts that outline a similar situation but haven't been successful so far.

I married my US husband in May 2009 in Michigan but I entered the US on a WWP (as a tourist). We did it like this because we never intended to stay in the US. He then entered my country and we started the immigration process here (which is a little different from the US one). He stayed here and worked while his application was being processed. Then after 7 months he was denied and has since gone back to the States. So I guess we have to go to plan B, which is to live in the US.

So I'm wondering what you guys think? Which is better, the K-3 route or the IR/CR 1 route? I also have a daughter from a previous relationship (which was the main reason we planned on staying in my country, in order not to uproot her). So my question is, which route is the better one in your opinion? I just want this to go as smooth as possible and without future problems. We are used to being in a long distance relationship (we've been doing it since 2004) so 1-2 months longer or shorter isn't really the biggest issue. The biggest thing is to do everything the proper way.

Would it be best to have our paperwork from here translated so we can show that the marriage on the WWP wasn't so that I could get a green card or something? I realize that looks kinda bad but we didn't expect him to be denied here

Thanks in advance

Aurora

Also married on the WWP, Also LIve in Michigan.... But my Huband is being deported for overstay.. but we have some common. Also my Husband, and I would rather go to his country then here but i have an 8 yr old and can't go. My prayers go out to you... maybe there is a way to search for answers together. Hang in there. =)

[Boiler 46,323]

Which country?