On Facebook: Israeli soldier posed with bound Arab

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

He remembers you forgot.

I asked you what the significance would be of posting pictures of headless corpses in this thread (if that were possible without violating the TOS, which it would). I still haven't gotten an answer. I don't necessarily expect one - but since that was your only point in the thread thus far, perhaps you will oblige.

[_Simpson_ 250]

I'd need to be fully aware of the complete case before reacting as to what I'd like for an IDF military board to do to this ex-soldier. Excessive? Perhaps not.

What I would do for a straight answer. So I take it as a no, OK.

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

I asked you what the significance would be of posting pictures of headless corpses in this thread (if that were possible without violating the TOS, which it would). I still haven't gotten an answer. I don't necessarily expect one - but since that was your only point in the thread thus far, perhaps you will oblige.

#20 your honor.

[HAL 9000 96]

He remembers you forgot.

That does beg a question... some of the vitriolic one-liners Rich (and someone else... can't remember now) posts on this topic make me question if maybe he's had a traumatic experience in the past in this conflict, or has had family victimized by terrorists in the past. Or maybe its just the one-liner because he thinks its cool, although it really isn't. ¿?

What I would do for a straight answer. So I take it as a no, OK.

No drama indeed.

[_Simpson_ 250]

Awwwww... yeahhh... I'll let your posts speak for themselves without having you fail at pointing fingers away from you.

Come on now your a scientist, I was hopping for a mind wrenching comeback.

[HAL 9000 96]

And as its been pointed before, she's not enlisted any more.

[_Simpson_ 250]

she'd have to be recalled back to active duty first.

OK

[HAL 9000 96]

Come on now your a scientist, I was hopping for a mind wrenching comeback.

Post #33 perhaps? As a scientist, I'm more concerned with helping you understand things a little more simpler. As a reader, all I can tell you the writing is literally right in front of you.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

#20 your honor.

Pointing out atrocities that took place in another country/theatre of war does not answer the question of why posting those (in theory) would be of any relevance to this thread.

[_Simpson_ 250]

And as its been pointed before, she's not enlisted any more.

not the point, I have been trying to get your opinion of what a justifiable punishment would be and its like pulling teeth.

[HAL 9000 96]

not the point, I have been trying to get your opinion of what a justifiable punishment would be and its like pulling teeth.

And as any rational answer should come out, one would need to be fully informed before rushing to judgment. Maybe you're not used to that?

The rest is right there, read.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

not the point, I have been trying to get your opinion of what a justifiable punishment would be and its like pulling teeth.

Why is your focus on individual punishment?

[_Simpson_ 250]

Post #33 perhaps? As a scientist, I'm more concerned with helping you understand things a little more simpler. As a reader, all I can tell you the writing is literally right in front of you.

Perhaps we give them medals instead.

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Pointing out atrocities that took place in another country/theatre of war does not answer the question of why posting those (in theory) would be of any relevance to this thread.

Is this good enough for ya? Please note the last sentence as if that matters, sheesh.

A video from Palestinian Islamic Jihad of a beheaded Israeli is being distributed on the internet. The video shows a crowd of Palestinians in Gaza, including children, shouting "Allahu akhbar!" (God is great) as a terrorist takes the head out of a bag and holds it up for the cheering crowd. Jihadi music plays in the background and the crowd is visibly ecstatic.

Visual evidence suggest that the victim may have been killed first, and then beheaded later.

Edited August 17, 2010 by Col. Lingus

[_Simpson_ 250]

And as any rational answer should come out, one would need to be fully informed before rushing to judgment. Maybe you're not used to that?

The rest is right there, read.

And once again you cant give a simple answer. What part of the story is missing that prohibits you from giving a personal opinion on what her punishment should be?