Its not just Arizona police

[PhiLandShiR 18]

that's not what the point is - i stated if asked. the above is whether police, in the absence of probable cause, can stop, question, or frisk an individual at all.

You are correct Charles.

But the point I am making is: There was no probable cause!!

The only info the police officer had was that 'someone' was accused of wearing clothes that were deemed 'not appropriate'.

No one from the staff at the pool pointed MS. Lovett out as that person. The cop assumed...

As far as the hiibel case is concerned...

Justice Kennedy's majority opinion noted, however, "[a]s we understand it, the statute does not require a suspect to give the officer a driver's license or any other document. Provided that the suspect either states his name or communicates it to the office by other means -- a choice, we assume, that the suspect may make -- the statute is satisfied and no violation occurs."

Ms. Lovett did in fact state her name to the officer...