Jump to content
I AM NOT THAT GUY

Obama spokesman's remarks draw fire from Pelosi

 Share

4 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline

WASHINGTON (AP) - In spite of criticism from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats, President Barack Obama's chief spokesman on Wednesday defended his remark that the party could lose control of the House in this fall's elections. He hastened to add that he doesn't think that will happen.

"I don't think I said anything that was politically shocking," White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said during his daily briefing with reporters.

Pelosi lashed out over Gibbs' comments when she met privately Tuesday night with House Democrats, saying that lawmakers believed the remarks had damaged their cause, according to an aide who was present. The aide spoke on condition of anonymity because the meeting was private.

Pelosi, D-Calif., assured fellow Democrats that Gibbs couldn't know what was going on in their districts, the aide said.

Asked Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press" if the Democratic majority in the House was in jeopardy, Gibbs responded: "I think there is no doubt there are a lot of seats that will be up, a lot of contested seats. I think people are going to have a choice to make in the fall, but I think there's no doubt there are enough seats in play that could cause Republicans to gain control."

On Wednesday, Gibbs responded tersely to reporters' questions on the matter.

Did he give the GOP an issue? "No."

If he could, would he rephrase his comment if it would make Democrats on the Hill feel better? "Of course."

Had he spoken with Pelosi? "I have not spoken with the speaker."

Would he like to? "If there's an occasion to speak, of course."

Gibbs said Obama hadn't talked to him about his remarks.

In the private meeting, Pelosi asked a White House legislative affairs official, Dan Turton, whether Gibbs was speaking for the White House, and Turton replied by essentially saying Gibbs' comments were unscripted, according to the aide.

Pelosi said she didn't even know Gibbs, according to the aide, although Gibbs said Wednesday that they'd met and had a "cordial" relationship.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GV13M80&show_article=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Belarus
Timeline

The queen of the House has spoken. She dissed Gibbs pretty hard in her comments about him.

"Credibility in immigration policy can be summed up in one sentence: Those who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and those who should not be here will be required to leave."

"...for the system to be credible, people actually have to be deported at the end of the process."

US Congresswoman Barbara Jordan (D-TX)

Testimony to the House Immigration Subcommittee, February 24, 1995

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Canada
Timeline

I would give anything for that crazy ###### to be knocked out of office.

nfrsig.jpg

The Great Canadian to Texas Transfer Timeline:

2/22/2010 - I-129F Packet Mailed

2/24/2010 - Packet Delivered to VSC

2/26/2010 - VSC Cashed Filing Fee

3/04/2010 - NOA1 Received!

8/14/2010 - Touched!

10/04/2010 - NOA2 Received!

10/25/2010 - Packet 3 Received!

02/07/2011 - Medical!

03/15/2011 - Interview in Montreal! - Approved!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Belarus
Timeline

I would give anything for that crazy ###### to be knocked out of office.

The Dems give the impression that they are the Big Tent party of the People, but a Pelosi is such a stuck up yuppie rich b*tch to blow that image down the toilet. She basicly reduced Gibbs to level of anomymous hired help. But then again Pelosi is an important person with important places to go, and important people to meet. Why should any comments other than hers' matter?

"Credibility in immigration policy can be summed up in one sentence: Those who should get in, get in; those who should be kept out, are kept out; and those who should not be here will be required to leave."

"...for the system to be credible, people actually have to be deported at the end of the process."

US Congresswoman Barbara Jordan (D-TX)

Testimony to the House Immigration Subcommittee, February 24, 1995

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...