Filipinos Against Arizona Immigration Law SB1070

[A and T 82]

It's pretty obvious from all the other replies here the value of your comments!!!

Yeah I'm the only non racist liberal here I guess. But, thats why we have the ACLU to help sue in any possible discriminatory situations such as the AZ law. And luckly the government has a filed a lawsuit

Its not that easy to come to the usa the legal way, thats the problem. More people would be legal if they could afford it , and the process was not so convoluted. Mexico is poor, people leave there to come here to make money to give their families better lives

You cant say you would not do the same for your family, especially if you couldn't afford to support your family in your own country.

Edited July 17, 2010 by nonversation

[Fudpukker 18]

[quote name=NVC FAN ' date='16 July 2010 - 04:11 PM' timestamp='1279314714' post='4070252]

i think that 1. there should be no towns or cities sitting on the south border, buy them up from mexico and make a 10 mile de militarized zone all along the border. 2 use drones and limited military persons to patrol it.

any living thing in the zone should be killed. post signs all along the mexican side stating such. that is what i would call 100 percent secure.

Agreed !!! They should secure the borders just like how they secure AREA

For the record I believe that the ACLU are troublemakers, Martin Luther King jr., Malcolm X, Farrakhan, the Reverend Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and Floyd Mayweather jr. are also troublemakers.

[Fudpukker 18]

This man is my HERO:

Drinking with BOB

[Fudpukker 18]

[quote name=NVC FAN ' date='16 July 2010 - 04:11 PM' timestamp='1279314714' post='4070252]

i think that 1. there should be no towns or cities sitting on the south border, buy them up from mexico and make a 10 mile de militarized zone all along the border. 2 use drones and limited military persons to patrol it.

any living thing in the zone should be killed. post signs all along the mexican side stating such. that is what i would call 100 percent secure.

Agreed !!! They should secure the borders just like how they secure AREA 51

For the record I believe that the ACLU are troublemakers, Martin Luther King jr., Malcolm X, Farrakhan, the Reverend Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and Floyd Mayweather jr. are also troublemakers.

[A and T 82]

Agreed !!! They should secure the borders just like how they secure AREA

For the record I believe that the ACLU are troublemakers, Martin Luther King jr., Malcolm X, Farrakhan, the Reverend Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and Floyd Mayweather jr. are also troublemakers.

I'm sure they have racist/supremacist forums you can visit for that type of thing. Your wife must be a strong women...

[Deputy Purple 1,294]

Its not that easy to come to the usa the legal way, thats the problem. More people would be legal if they could afford it , and the process was not so convoluted. Mexico is poor, people leave there to come here to make money to give their families better lives.

Aww...

Buying a new car is too expensive, more people would buy a new car if they could afford it. I guess the answer is that everyone should just steal a new car because they deserve the best car someone else can afford.

[Fudpukker 18]

I'm sure they have racist/supremacist forums you can visit for that type of thing. Your wife must be a strong women...

Not once did I ever say or use the word RACIST, it came from you so i'm going to say that you are the RACIST here, meaning that you had to think of it and use that word not me.................................

They are troublemakers, just watch a episode of Cops and maybe you will see what I mean.

Edited July 17, 2010 by -Jason and Rose-

[evli1966 88]

Not once did I ever say or use the word RACIST, it came from you so i'm going to say that you are the RACIST here, meaning that you had to think of it and use that word not me.................................

They are troublemakers, just watch a episode of Cops and maybe you will see what I mean.

I wonder if he supports his liberal non racist Blank Panthers supported by the liberal non racist NAACP.

I agree Jason and Rose never mentioned race the only person here mentioning it is NON.

Not trying o bash you non but calling the race card wore out 2 months ago or more; besides the Liberal Administration isn't even challenging the AZ SB1070 law on grounds that the law is racist because it is not.

[NVC FAN :( 18]

I'm sure they have racist/supremacist forums you can visit for that type of thing. Your wife must be a strong women...

she sure is and she is from the provinces, and very conservative.

[A and T 82]

Not once did I ever say or use the word RACIST, it came from you so i'm going to say that you are the RACIST here, meaning that you had to think of it and use that word not me.................................

They are troublemakers, just watch a episode of Cops and maybe you will see what I mean.

All the people you listed as "trouble makers" are black, you are racist sir. Does your wife know you a racist?

[A and T 82]

Aww...

Buying a new car is too expensive, more people would buy a new car if they could afford it. I guess the answer is that everyone should just steal a new car because they deserve the best car someone else can afford.

Difference in material objects, and jobs. Lets say the usa goes into a huge depression and you have no work, but lets say they have work in canada but make it extremely difficult for people to get in. Would you cross over and work to support your family even if it were against the law? Of course

No one here can say they would let their family starve without doing what it takes to support them.

[Fudpukker 18]

Hey I didn't say RACIST nor did I say BLACK but you did. How dare you accuse me of being racist. You pulled the race card not me. I may be predjudice to the attitude of the names I listed but not racist. This is the second time you are including my wife. Why don't you keep my wife out of this since i never said anything about your wife. Wise up SIR or join the star fleet academy.

[Pinay Wife 47]

Please keep the conversation civil. No name calling please. Thanks.

Pinay Wife

VJ Mod Team

[Deputy Purple 1,294]

Difference in material objects, and jobs. Lets say the usa goes into a huge depression and you have no work, but lets say they have work in canada but make it extremely difficult for people to get in. Would you cross over and work to support your family even if it were against the law? Of course

No one here can say they would let their family starve without doing what it takes to support them.

No I would not...

I have worked ####### jobs to make ends meet in my early twenties to support my wife an children. I'm resourceful and would find a way.

The difference is irrelevant, either situation is someone feeling they have a right to something that they don't and feeling justified breaking laws to take it.

Edited July 17, 2010 by Bob 4 Anna

[JSVP08 3]

NO to illegal entry!! .... there's law, there's order, there's peace !!

life is good.