Why Democrats will almost always win (even if they lose badly in November)

[one...two...tree 2,762]

The Democratic Party may lose dozens of seats in November, but every demographic trend still favors the left.

By Joe Conason

The warnings for Democrats in national polling data remain bleak and unmistakable, from a demoralized progressive base to a revitalized hardcore right, with disenchanted independents veering Republican. With employment trending poorly and no second stimulus in sight, the current question is not whether the Democratic Party will be beaten in the midterm but just how badly.

Before Republicans start to dream again of Karl Rove's hundred years of GOP domination, however, they might consult the latest working paper by political demographer Ruy Teixeira, who predicted the return of the Democrats back when things looked worst for his party during the early Bush era. According to Teixeira, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, every long-term trend in population, occupation and education still portends a Democratic America in the 21st century.

By now many Americans are aware that the United States is becoming "majority-minority" within the next few decades, a change that Teixeira predicts will occur by 2042. Between now and then, the strongly Democratic orientation of minority voters -- African-Americans, Latinos and Asian-Americans -- will continue to shape electoral results in most states. At the same time, the share of conservative white working-class voters, who tend to vote Republican, is declining:

Heavily Democratic minority voters (80 percent for Obama) increased their share of votes in U.S. presidential elections by 11 percentage points between 1988 and 2008, while the share of increasingly Democratic white college graduate voters rose 4 points. But the share of white working-class (not college-educated) voters, who have remained conservative in their orientation, has plummeted by 15 points.

By 2050, the country will be 54 percent minority as Latinos double from 15 percent to 30 percent of the population, Asian Americans increase from 5 percent to 9 percent, and African Americans move from 14 to 15 percent.

But the Republicans face severe alienation among other growing demographic cohorts as well:

The Millennial generation (those born between 1978 and 2000) is adding 4 million eligible voters to the voting pool every year, and this group voted for Obama by a stunning 66-32 margin in 2008. By 2020—the first presidential election in which all Millennials will have reached voting age—this generation will be 103 million strong, and about 90 million of them will be eligible voters. Those 90 million Millennial eligible voters will represent just under 40 percent of America's total eligible voters…

Professionals are now the most Democratic and fastest-growing occupational group in the United States, and they are a huge chunk of the burgeoning white college graduate population. They gave Obama an estimated 68 percent of their vote in 2008. By the middle of this decade, professionals will account for around one in five American workers….

Democrats also generally do better among women than men, and they do particularly well among growing female subgroups such as the unmarried and the college educated. Seventy percent of unmarried women voted for Obama, and an estimated 65 percent of college-educated women supported him. Unmarried women are now 47 percent, or almost half, of adult women, up from 38 percent in 1970, and college-educated women are an especially rapidly growing population. Their numbers have more than have tripled in recent decades, from just eight percent of the 25-and-older female population in 1970 to 28 percent today.

Finally, growing religious diversity favors Democrats as well, especially rapid increases among the unaffiliated (75 percent of whom voted for Obama). Unaffiliated or secular voters—not white evangelical Protestants—are the fastest-growing "religious" group in the United States… Looking even farther down

the road, white Christians will be only around 35 percent of the population by 2040, and conservative white Christians, who have been such a critical part of the Republican base, will be only about a third of that—a minority within a minority.

Although he is certainly a Democratic partisan, Teixeira says the party could easily forfeit all of its advantages:

[The Democrats'] chief challenge now is governance, which is daunting in its own right. They have an ambitious agenda in areas such as health care, financial reform, education, energy, and global relations that they are having some success in pursuing. If these policies have their intended effects and make serious progress toward remedying problems in these areas, Democrats will be in very good shape indeed and will solidify their support among emerging demographics while destabilizing what is left of the GOP coalition.

Conversely, if the Democrats fail to produce—whether through ineffective programs, fiscal meltdown, or both—even an unreformed GOP will remain very competitive despite the many demographic changes that are disadvantaging the party. The next few years will tell the tale.

Governing, of course, will become even more difficult with smaller majorities in the House and the Senate, a prospect that requires a toughness yet to be displayed in the Obama White House or on Capitol Hill.

link

[Heracles 417]

I am starting to see why you blindly and illogically support illegal and unfettered immigration. Evidently, the means justifies the end - more votes.

The white Americans will just move to the next frontiers - Canada and Australia. So while you guys live in third world squalor, they'll live it up in two countries with a standard of living by then, that 20 2050 Americas will not be able to reach.

Heck, those two are already beating the average Joe now and have enough resources to last them 500 years [minimum]. :lol:

Edited July 7, 2010 by Booyah!

[Heracles 417]

Don't believe me, fine, don't care really but think about white flight.

Caucasian Americans are not as dumb as libs make them.

Edited July 7, 2010 by Booyah!

[Sofiyya 1,687]

** fantasies are highly entertaining

[natty bumppo 297]

** fantasies are highly entertaining

unfortunately ... the fantasies are required reading in grades 9-12 .... a few understand ... the rest think it's gospel ...

[Usui Takumi 1,562]

Don't believe me, fine, don't care really but think about white flight.

Caucasian Americans are not as dumb as libs make them.

Its not necessarily "white flight". Even without illegal immigration the trend will occur because of birth rates. White people have a lower birth rate than say latinos, or African groups so its bound to happen unless white people suddenly start having more children for one reason or another.

[natty bumppo 297]

Its not necessarily "white flight". Even without illegal immigration the trend will occur because of birth rates. White people have a lower birth rate than say latinos, or African groups so its bound to happen unless white people suddenly start having more children for one reason or another.

is this a cultural or religious thing?

[Usui Takumi 1,562]

is this a cultural or religious thing?

Generally related to women's education. Their education level impacts the number of children they have.

[natty bumppo 297]

Generally related to women's education. Their education level impacts the number of children they have.

women have children by themselves ... sorta like spontaneous combustion?

[Usui Takumi 1,562]

women have children by themselves ... sorta like spontaneous combustion?

I'm tired and its time for bed. Read this instead:

According to data from Demographic and Health Surveys for nine Latin American countries, women with no education have large families of 6-7 children, whereas better educated women have family sizes of 2-3 children, analogous to those of women in the developed world. Despite these wide differentials in actual fertility, desired family size is surprisingly homogeneous throughout the educational spectrum. While the least educated and the best educated women share the small family norm, the gap in contraceptive prevalence between the two groups ranges from 20-50 percentage points. Better educated women have broader knowledge, higher socioeconomic status and less fatalistic attitudes toward reproduction than do less educated women. Results of a regression analysis indicate that these cognitive, economic and attitudinal assets mediate the influence of schooling on reproductive behavior and partly explain the wide fertility gap between educational strata.

(International Family Planning Perspectives, 21:52-57 & 80, 1995)