Jump to content
Dr. A ♥ O

ACLU issues advisory to holiday travelers about Arizona's anti-illegal immigration law

63 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

'PAU' both wife and daughter in the U.S. 08/25/2009

Daughter's' CRBA Manila Embassy 08/07/2008 dual citizenship

http://crbausembassy....wordpress.com/

Posted

name='novotul' date='01 July 2010 - 09:24 AM' timestamp='1278012261' post='4040055']

We've had "interesting" experiences with the local police that lead us to conclude that the greatest threat to peaceable enjoyment of one's home by law-abiding citizens comes from police. Given her negative interactions with cops here -- where we were 100% innocent and aggrieved, BTW -- her attitude toward the new law in Arizona is, "I will never set foot in that state, cops have too much power in this country as it is." Can't say I blame her.

She draws strong constrasts between cops here and the experiences she's had back home: cops there have been uniformly decent, respectful, polite, and law-abiding. I've had some experiences with cops in her home country, too, that support the contrast.

Youtube is full of vids on bad russian cops :whistle:

RUSSIAN COPS GOING MAD !!! BEAT MAN TO DEATH !!! POLICE HAVOC WORLDWIDE !!! SIGNS VIOLENCE

'PAU' both wife and daughter in the U.S. 08/25/2009

Daughter's' CRBA Manila Embassy 08/07/2008 dual citizenship

http://crbausembassy....wordpress.com/

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
If you are not breaking the Law, you have nothing to worry about from the Police. If you are breaking the law, Speeding etc and you are not an Illegal you have nothing to worry about from the Police, other than a ticket of course.
I'll have to show Tbone this post lol.
You rang, si man?

Lol yes. We have a live one who thinks the police are like the pope "infallible".

Let's put it this way, si man: Until the next Supreme Court ruling(s) that will completely eviscerate the Fourth & Fifth Amendments, the most useful phrases in dealing with the Law are:

1. "Officer, I respect that you're just trying to do your job, but I don't wish to talk to you. Good day."

2. "Officer, I wish to leave. Am I free to go?"

3. "I do NOT consent to ANY search."

4. "I wish to consult with an attorney right now."

Remember that police work for the State, and the State is after two things: bodies (arrests) & revenue (fines), si man.

Bear in mind that your state may have a "Stop & Identify" or "Failure to Identify" law that requires you to produce or recite ID information to any officer who requests it. This is the outgrowth of the truly tragic Supreme Court ruling in Hiibel v. 6th Judicial of Nevada, sigh man. This case was discussed in depth a few weeks ago in another forum; if I find it, I'll post the link, si man.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...