Jump to content
I AM NOT THAT GUY

CBO says debt will reach 62 percent of GDP by year's end

 Share

20 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline

The national debt will reach 62 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) by the end of this year, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) said Wednesday.

The budget office said the debt will reach its highest percentage of GDP since the end of World War II. The jump is driven by lower tax revenues and higher federal spending in the recent recession.

And while the national debt would stabilize at 67 percent of GDP over the next decade if current law were maintained, extending tax cuts enacted during the administration of President George W. Bush and keeping growth in appropriations in line with inflation would mean that the debt would reach almost 90 percent of GDP by 2020.

By contrast, GDP has averaged "a little above" 36 percent per year over the past 40 years.

The report comes as President Barack Obama's fiscal commission meets again on Wednesday to work on crafting solutions to reining in deficits and the debt over time.

Obama got somewhat of a chilly reception from world leaders at the G-20 summit over the past weekend when he pressed them to continue with spending to bolster the global economy. Many nations in Europe and elsewhere have had to grapple with their own debt crises, and have been forced to enact tough austerity measures.

Republicans have been hammering away at the president and Democrats in Congress for their spending over the past year and a half, arguing that the stimulus act, healthcare reform law and other measures have done little more than exacerbate the nation's fiscal situation.

But the bigger long-term problem, according to CBO, remains Medicare.

CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf wrote in a blog post explaining the new report that under current laws, "federal spending on major mandatory healthcare programs will grow from roughly 5 percent of GDP today to about 10 percent in 2035 and will continue to increase thereafter."

Keeping current policies in place would almost certainly force lawmakers to make steep spending cuts and raise taxes, Elmendorf argued, unless changes to address the problems were made sooner rather than later.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/106355-cbo-says-debt-will-reach-62-percent-of-gdp-by-years-end

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Afghanistan
Timeline

Did you know that there have been only 2 republican presidents who have seen a reduction of debt/gdp since WW2? Eisenhower and Nixon. There has also been no democratic presidents that oversaw an increase of debt/gdp since ww2.

Edited by Sousuke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

Did you know that there have been only 2 republican presidents who have seen a reduction of debt/gdp since WW2? Eisenhower and Nixon. There has also been no democratic presidents that oversaw an increase of debt/gdp since ww2.

Well, Obama did say he wanted to change things. :rofl:

Increasing the national debt 3 trillion dollars in 18 months is a good start! Highest debt percentage since WWWII, where FDR topped out at a whopping 120% National Debt/Gross National Product.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Afghanistan
Timeline

Well, Obama did say he wanted to change things. :rofl:

Increasing the national debt 3 trillion dollars in 18 months is a good start! Highest debt percentage since WWWII, where FDR topped out at a whopping 120% National Debt/Gross National Product.

Obama hasn't finished his term and FDR died whilst in the middle of a world war. What you'd have had the US capitulate with Hitler and Hirohito?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

If you are a social darwinist as you say then you must also support the holocaust. Of course you'd be one to argue for capitulation.

That's a long stretch there, and of course, you would be wrong. There is a difference between genocide, and letting nature take its course. One is passive, the other active. And being selective in your outrage, is even more disturbing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Afghanistan
Timeline

That's a long stretch there, and of course, you would be wrong. There is a difference between genocide, and letting nature take its course. One is passive, the other active. And being selective in your outrage, is even more disturbing.

What two groups pitted against either is active whilst individuals are not? But then we know your opinion on the rights of corporations.

I'm sorry if I hold human life in higher regard than you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

What two groups pitted against either is active whilst individuals are not? But then we know your opinion on the rights of corporations.

I'm sorry if I hold human life in higher regard than you.

Really. Now you are projecting. However, we will have to continue this another time, when we can put your statement to the test, and you can offer sober, coherent thoughts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Afghanistan
Timeline

Really. Now you are projecting. However, we will have to continue this another time, when we can put your statement to the test, and you can offer sober, coherent thoughts.

In your disgusting arguments all you can attack is my sobriety?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Afghanistan
Timeline

As a recap to ########'s recent posts for anyone else who might visit this thread, he has stated that the unemployed are "whiners" and if they can't make it, they should be allowed to die without assistance..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a recap to ########'s recent posts for anyone else who might visit this thread, he has stated that the unemployed are "whiners" and if they can't make it, they should be allowed to die without assistance..........

Why are you surprised? Surely you have heard of Tycho and Gabe's Internet Fkwad Theory!

mooglesmall2-1-1.jpgDelicioussig.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...