Jump to content

141 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Other Country: Israel
Timeline
Posted

My words have been extremely explicit in their intent and the 'offense' that I take is to the notion that clothing, in particular clothing that covers and hides the female form is symbolic of chastity, modesty, sexual propriety because there is no getting around the notion that if you believe the former then you necessarily believe that those who do not dress in this way are the opposite, promiscuous, provocative, loose. That is an absurd symbolism. If you wish to please god, there are much better ways to do so and with your body - the best way is to keep it healthy.

Since you have been chastising and making negative comments re women who cover for modesty and to please God, any rebuttal to your stance sounds judgmental to you. However, you are the one judging from your western feminist perspective, which denies that there is any difference between men and women, either biologically or physiologically. It's futile for you to try to dictate your position to others who are not western feminists. It rarely makes a positive impact.

Posted

Since you have been chastising and making negative comments re women who cover for modesty and to please God, any rebuttal to your stance sounds judgmental to you. However, you are the one judging from your western feminist perspective, which denies that there is any difference between men and women, either biologically or physiologically. It's futile for you to try to dictate your position to others who are not western feminists. It rarely makes a positive impact.

Western Feminist? Well, that's one way of looking at women as more than the sum of their biological parts. That's the point though, I am completely aware of the fact that men and women are biologically different, but that does not mean I can't and should not demand that men respect women regardless of how they dress and the women should value more about themselves and their bodies than simply that which denotes their sex.

As to chastising, rot. I have clearly stated that a genuine wish to please god is non of my concern and something that people can and should do that if they so choose but you want me to believe that the expression of 'modesty' through a choice of clothing is somehow exempt from any expectation of societal norms as they currently stand - well, that's ridiculous.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Posted

Western Feminist? Well, that's one way of looking at women as more than the sum of their biological parts. That's the point though, I am completely aware of the fact that men and women are biologically different, but that does not mean I can't and should not demand that men respect women regardless of how they dress and the women should value more about themselves and their bodies than simply that which denotes their sex.

As to chastising, rot. I have clearly stated that a genuine wish to please god is non of my concern and something that people can and should do that if they so choose but you want me to believe that the expression of 'modesty' through a choice of clothing is somehow exempt from any expectation of societal norms as they currently stand - well, that's ridiculous.

Said you and your understanding of social norm.

N400 CITIZENSHIP STAGE

23-DEC-2016 -:- N400 form mailed to Dallas, TX Lockbox (USPS EXPRESS)

27-DEC-2016 -:- N400 form delivered/picked up by USCIS

01-JAN-2017 -:- N400 form fee check cashed by USCIS

04-JAN-2017 -:- N400 form received per NOA1

09-JAN-2017 -:- N400 form NOA1 notice date

14-JAN-2017 -:- N400 form NOA1 on hand through USPS

30-JAN-2017 -:- N400 fingerprint taken

01-FEB-2017 -:- N400 interview schedule process started

26-JUL-2017 -:- N400 interview date set (01SEP2017)

29-JUL-2017 -:- N400 interview letter on hand

01-SEP-2017 -:- N400 interview date - Interview passed

10-OCT-2017-:- N400 oath ceremony letter on hand (oath on 26OCT2017)

Posted

By the by, as I understand it (and if the translation of his words is accurate) at least one notable imam has made statements to the effect that women's choice of clothing has so much effect that god is showing his displeasure by way of natural disasters. Is that an accurate portrayal? If so, should such statements be rebutted by more moderate imams to show that moderate muslims do not feel that women are the sole arbiter of sexual propriety and such expressions are ignorant and demeaning to normal muslim women? Perhaps such statements have been made? Care to comment? Or would you prefer to bluster on about my supposed indignation that women should want to please god?

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

that does not mean I can't and should not demand that men respect women regardless of how they dress

i'd so love to see how that plays out in a strip joint :pop:

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Posted

Said you and your understanding of social norm.

Yes, that is my understanding, that in most societies, historically and currently women have been portrayed as loose and promiscuous or chaste and wholesome based entirely on their attire, hence how men have been able to put up the defense of 'she was asking for it' based on the state of dress of women in sexual abuse cases and indeed how muslim women have no defense at all if they are out in the streets and are abused, let alone out in the streets and not wearing certain types of clothing.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Posted

i'd so love to see how that plays out in a strip joint :pop:

Surely even you can see that:

1) Stripping is not based simply on the woman being scantily clad. They have to act in a certain way that is provocative and openly acknowledged by all parties as sexual.

2) There are very strict rules at strip clubs, even the act of stripping, with all that provocation and acknowledgment of sexuality is not an open invitation for men to abuse the woman. She still has complete control of who she does and does not have intimate sexual acts with.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

Surely even you can see that:

1) Stripping is not based simply on the woman being scantily clad. They have to act in a certain way that is provocative and openly acknowledged by all parties as sexual.

2) There are very strict rules at strip clubs, even the act of stripping, with all that provocation and acknowledgment of sexuality is not an open invitation for men to abuse the woman. She still has complete control of who she does and does not have intimate sexual acts with.

that's all well and wonderful, but please hold the abuse red herring and add extra onions please.

your statement earlier was "that does not mean I can't and should not demand that men respect women regardless of how they dress"

my take on that is i'd love to see you enforce that in a strip joint. :lol:

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Posted

In many ways, a strip club is a perfect example of how men can and should be expected to behave properly no matter what the visual stimulation. They know the rules of strip clubs and they abide by them - the same should be true in greater society - men should know that just because a woman is in a bikini, it does not mean she is not chaste, modest and even monogomous and indeed a lot of men are capable of making these distinctions and in societies that this is true, women have this freedom because of a relaxation and rebuttal of the whole being covered is a symbol of chastity rubbish purveyed by insidious belief systems.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Posted

that's all well and wonderful, but please hold the abuse red herring and add extra onions please.

your statement earlier was "that does not mean I can't and should not demand that men respect women regardless of how they dress"

my take on that is i'd love to see you enforce that in a strip joint. :lol:

It is enforced. Women are respected by men who frequent strip clubs - if they were not, the men would not follow the strict rules. If a man chooses to believe that a woman who strips is necessarily promiscuous, I think that says how far people have to go along the road of equality.

Even if a woman is promiscuous, does that mean she should be disrespected? You have your choice as to whether you personally find chastity or promiscuity an attractive quality but that does not mean you respect a promiscuous woman any less, unless you do feel that you can and should do whatever you want with her because she is 'asking for it'. Is that your position?

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

In many ways, a strip club is a perfect example of how men can and should be expected to behave properly no matter what the visual stimulation. They know the rules of strip clubs and they abide by them - the same should be true in greater society - men should know that just because a woman is in a bikini, it does not mean she is not chaste, modest and even monogomous and indeed a lot of men are capable of making these distinctions and in societies that this is true, women have this freedom because of a relaxation and rebuttal of the whole being covered is a symbol of chastity rubbish purveyed by insidious belief systems.

we're not talking about behaving properly - it was about "respect"

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Posted

we're not talking about behaving properly - it was about "respect"

Right, and in this context respect means behaving with civility towards a woman regardless of what job she does, even if her job is a stripper. What type of respect would you not give to a stripper? You seem to want to define it, so go ahead, define it in such a way as it is meaningful to the person you hold no respect for, presumably in this case strippers, right?

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

Right, and in this context respect means behaving with civility towards a woman regardless of what job she does, even if her job is a stripper. What type of respect would you not give to a stripper? You seem to want to define it, so go ahead, define it in such a way as it is meaningful to the person you hold no respect for, presumably in this case strippers, right?

one could just as easily say they are respecting the established rule of the establishment, not the stripper, by their behaving well.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted

Right, and in this context respect means behaving with civility towards a woman regardless of what job she does, even if her job is a stripper. What type of respect would you not give to a stripper? You seem to want to define it, so go ahead, define it in such a way as it is meaningful to the person you hold no respect for, presumably in this case strippers, right?

Respect for women? Men in a strip club obey the rules so they can continue ogling the women and avoid getting their heads caved in by the bouncers. Following the rules in that situation has little or nothing to do with respect for the women performing.

I-129F Sent : 2010-01-16
Visa Approved!!: 2010-04-20
Visa Received: 2010-04-28
POE Chicago: 2010-05-01
Married: 2010-06-30
AOS filed: 2011-01-25
AOS Approved: 2011-03-25

ROC Approved 06-2013

Citizen 09-14

Filed: Other Country: Afghanistan
Timeline
Posted (edited)

I have no doubt that the Hijab was originally developed with the idea of female repression. However, these days it seems that many women honestly wear such items because they want to be modestly dressed and they do so of their own accord.

I think modern feminism is about wearing what the woman actually wants to wear be it a full robe or a bikini without regard to the perceptions of men.

Obviously if a husband is demanding that a woman wear something then that's another issue.

Iran might be a good example of the Hijab being used in a repressive manner because woman simply have no choice. Obviously many women there would NOT wear it if they weren't forced too...just think of the 70's there. But when women truly have freedom of choice I see no issue with it. (With the exception of face covering)

Edited by Sousuke
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...