The Secrets of Obama's Underappreciated Success

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

By Mark Halperin

Monday, Apr. 26, 2010

Barack Obama's right-wing opponents have cast him as a socialist failure. His left-wing hecklers see him as an over-cautious hedger. But, critics notwithstanding, President Obama is on the path to be a huge success by the time of November's midterm elections.

Before the Right jabbers (what about the huge debt, the broken tax pledge, the paucity of overseas accomplishments?), the Left yammers (Guantanamo hasn't been closed, gays aren't serving openly in the military, too many policies cater to business interests!), and the media chides (POTUS and party poll numbers are down, Washington is more partisan than ever), look at the two key metrics that underscore Obama's accomplishments. It is too early to assess the ultimate measure of victory — whether the President's actions have been prudent and beneficial, domestically and internationally. But by Election Day, 2010, Obama will have soundly achieved many of his chief campaign promises while running a highly competent, scandal-free government. Not bad for a guy whose opponents (in both parties) for the White House suggested he was too green in national life to know how to do the job — and whose presidency began in the midst of a worldwide economic crisis that demanded urgent attention and commanded much of his focus. (See "Obama's Troubled First Year: Grading Him on the Key Issues.")

Let's start with the competence Obama has shown. As he proved in the campaign, he is a master of personnel decisions, choosing people who are excellent at what they do, but also requiring that they play nicely with others. In the two most vital areas, national security and economic policy, all the President's women and men generally get along well and have had critical roles in advancing the agenda. It is true that the economic team in particular has some rivalries, and the administration still hasn't figured out how to overcome its collectively weak public communications skills on the economy. But overall, the White House is populated by hard workers who are rowing in unison to advance the cause, and rarely take their disagreements public through damaging leaks.

Obama's two best personnel decisions were probably the two men serving right below him — Vice President Joe Biden and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. Yes, Biden still falls victim to caricature as an irrepressible bigmouth and is the butt of late-night jokes. And Emanuel can be overly brash and flutter nerves both on Capitol Hill and among administration allies. But Obama knew what he was getting in both men and they have performed up to or above his expectations. With West Wing offices right across the hall from each other, Biden and Emanuel often work in tandem, each doing more heavy lifting than is publicly seen or commonly known. Obama — who proved during the campaign that he knows how to maintain full control of his operation without micro-managing — sets the tone and overall goals, and then allows his Veep and his Chief, along with other senior advisers, to execute the plans. (See who's who in Barack Obama's White House.)

Biden has traveled extensively overseas and around the country and helped to coordinate both national security policy and congressional strategy, while dealing with governors and mayors on the economy. Politically, he is expected to be an asset in the midterms, as he was in 2008, with the kind of white working class voters who appreciate his homely truths and affable manner, and who still haven't warmed to Obama.

As for Emanuel, Obama was intent on selecting a tough, competitive, savvy chief of staff, one able to use the levers of power to advance an agenda through both legislation and executive action. Emanuel unexpectedly found himself in the spotlight last week when he appeared on "Charlie Rose" and repeated his oft-expressed interest in one day serving as mayor of Chicago. The press flew into a frenzy, and some pundits deemed the remark an unseemly display of ambition. It was, in fact, a reminder of Emanuel's deep ties to his hometown, his reluctance to leave his job as a member of Congress to join the administration — part of the House leadership, Emanuel was on a direct path to be the Speaker within a decade — and his willingness to bow to Obama's wishes and jettison his long-term plans in order to manage the White House. (See "Obama After a Year: What's Changed, and What Hasn't.")

Emanuel's hand (and his six years of experience in the Clinton Administration) can be seen in many facets of the operational success. The White House controls the Washington and media agenda most days, carefully coordinating with Capitol Hill and interest groups partners. Bad news is not allowed to fester. And the greatest asset, the President himself, is deployed with strategic planning and tactical nimbleness.

It's easy to forget what circumstances could be like, what problems Obama might have encountered. Think back just a few years ago, to the last time a young Democrat was swept into the White House on a message of change. Unlike Bill Clinton, especially early in his own presidency, Obama has largely maintained control of his public image and preserved the majesty of the office (harder than for any other previous president ever because of the toxic Freak Show nature of our politico-media culture), and maintained good relations, in public and in private, with the armed services brass, the intelligence community, and law enforcement.

The passage of health care and the pledge to help Democrats wherever possible with fundraising and political assistance has (for now at least) quieted the Capitol Hill voices that until recently were questioning the White House's competence and commitment. Control of Congress makes things easier, for sure, but so does an absence of indicted, disgraced, or bungling appointees. (See the 5 things to watch at Obama's health care summit.)

Over the past sixteen months, both Biden and Emanuel have expressed concern internally that Obama has been too bold, risking his presidency on big bets. But those disagreements with the President have been fleeting and mostly futile — and, as it happens, unwarranted. So far, most of Obama's big bets have paid off.

Health care's passage is of course the White House's signal achievement, accomplished without revealing the administration's full cognizance (thanks to internal polling and focus groups) of the legislation's stark unpopularity among the public. But beyond health care, Obama acted decisively to stop the world from going into economic depression, after inheriting a mess from his predecessor. Quibble all you wish about the dimensions of the stimulus law or the administration of the TARP or the Detroit bailout, but the actions taken were professionally handled, apparently necessary, and, so far, constructive. Strikingly underrated by the Washington press corps are Obama's gains on education policy, including a willingness to confront the education establishment on standards for both teachers and students. Overseas, Obama has snagged an arms reduction deal with Russia, managed the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq exactly as he promised, eliminated numerous terrorist leaders through an aggressive targeting operation, and laid the groundwork for dealing with Iran and, perhaps, North Korea. (See the five immediate benefits of health reform.)

In the months ahead, the President will likely pass a financial regulation overhaul (despite this weekend's snags); manage the confirmation of a second Supreme Court nominee with relatively little commotion; announce the reduction of the American troop level in Iraq to around 50,000; showcase the under-covered gains on education reform; take advantage of the improving economy to tout his stimulus efforts; and sharpen his "Obama-Biden future versus Bush-Cheney past" argument to help stave off massive Democratic losses in November. He also has a decent chance to pass a small-to-medium-sized energy bill. True, some promises, such as comprehensive immigration reform, will remain undone, but most of his major goals will be completed or well underway.

And after the midterms, assuming the President needs a game-changing move in the wake of significant losses, Emanuel has already played a clever bit of inside-baseball, installing his old friend and Clinton Administration ally Bruce Reid as the staff director of the bipartisan deficit reduction commission that is due to make recommendations in December. If there are big Republican electoral gains, expect the analysis from conservatives and the media to be that the country wanted a check on big spending from Washington. That overriding concern could shape the outcome more than any of Obama's accomplishments or any appreciation for the job he has done for the last two years. The commission's proposals can then be coordinated with an "I get it" message from Obama, providing a bold opening to the second half of his first term as he sets about tackling another campaign promise — long-term deficit reduction. A difficult pledge to achieve perhaps, but, given the president's track record, one that shouldn't be dismissed out of hand.

http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1984460,00.html

[Obama 2012 1,714]

By Mark Halperin

Monday, Apr. 26, 2010

Barack Obama's right-wing opponents have cast him as a socialist failure. His left-wing hecklers see him as an over-cautious hedger. But, critics notwithstanding, President Obama is on the path to be a huge success by the time of November's midterm elections.

Before the Right jabbers (what about the huge debt, the broken tax pledge, the paucity of overseas accomplishments?), the Left yammers (Guantanamo hasn't been closed, gays aren't serving openly in the military, too many policies cater to business interests!), and the media chides (POTUS and party poll numbers are down, Washington is more partisan than ever), look at the two key metrics that underscore Obama's accomplishments. It is too early to assess the ultimate measure of victory — whether the President's actions have been prudent and beneficial, domestically and internationally. But by Election Day, 2010, Obama will have soundly achieved many of his chief campaign promises while running a highly competent, scandal-free government. Not bad for a guy whose opponents (in both parties) for the White House suggested he was too green in national life to know how to do the job — and whose presidency began in the midst of a worldwide economic crisis that demanded urgent attention and commanded much of his focus. (See "Obama's Troubled First Year: Grading Him on the Key Issues.")

Let's start with the competence Obama has shown. As he proved in the campaign, he is a master of personnel decisions, choosing people who are excellent at what they do, but also requiring that they play nicely with others. In the two most vital areas, national security and economic policy, all the President's women and men generally get along well and have had critical roles in advancing the agenda. It is true that the economic team in particular has some rivalries, and the administration still hasn't figured out how to overcome its collectively weak public communications skills on the economy. But overall, the White House is populated by hard workers who are rowing in unison to advance the cause, and rarely take their disagreements public through damaging leaks.

Obama's two best personnel decisions were probably the two men serving right below him — Vice President Joe Biden and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. Yes, Biden still falls victim to caricature as an irrepressible bigmouth and is the butt of late-night jokes. And Emanuel can be overly brash and flutter nerves both on Capitol Hill and among administration allies. But Obama knew what he was getting in both men and they have performed up to or above his expectations. With West Wing offices right across the hall from each other, Biden and Emanuel often work in tandem, each doing more heavy lifting than is publicly seen or commonly known. Obama — who proved during the campaign that he knows how to maintain full control of his operation without micro-managing — sets the tone and overall goals, and then allows his Veep and his Chief, along with other senior advisers, to execute the plans. (See who's who in Barack Obama's White House.)

Biden has traveled extensively overseas and around the country and helped to coordinate both national security policy and congressional strategy, while dealing with governors and mayors on the economy. Politically, he is expected to be an asset in the midterms, as he was in 2008, with the kind of white working class voters who appreciate his homely truths and affable manner, and who still haven't warmed to Obama.

As for Emanuel, Obama was intent on selecting a tough, competitive, savvy chief of staff, one able to use the levers of power to advance an agenda through both legislation and executive action. Emanuel unexpectedly found himself in the spotlight last week when he appeared on "Charlie Rose" and repeated his oft-expressed interest in one day serving as mayor of Chicago. The press flew into a frenzy, and some pundits deemed the remark an unseemly display of ambition. It was, in fact, a reminder of Emanuel's deep ties to his hometown, his reluctance to leave his job as a member of Congress to join the administration — part of the House leadership, Emanuel was on a direct path to be the Speaker within a decade — and his willingness to bow to Obama's wishes and jettison his long-term plans in order to manage the White House. (See "Obama After a Year: What's Changed, and What Hasn't.")

Emanuel's hand (and his six years of experience in the Clinton Administration) can be seen in many facets of the operational success. The White House controls the Washington and media agenda most days, carefully coordinating with Capitol Hill and interest groups partners. Bad news is not allowed to fester. And the greatest asset, the President himself, is deployed with strategic planning and tactical nimbleness.

It's easy to forget what circumstances could be like, what problems Obama might have encountered. Think back just a few years ago, to the last time a young Democrat was swept into the White House on a message of change. Unlike Bill Clinton, especially early in his own presidency, Obama has largely maintained control of his public image and preserved the majesty of the office (harder than for any other previous president ever because of the toxic Freak Show nature of our politico-media culture), and maintained good relations, in public and in private, with the armed services brass, the intelligence community, and law enforcement.

The passage of health care and the pledge to help Democrats wherever possible with fundraising and political assistance has (for now at least) quieted the Capitol Hill voices that until recently were questioning the White House's competence and commitment. Control of Congress makes things easier, for sure, but so does an absence of indicted, disgraced, or bungling appointees. (See the 5 things to watch at Obama's health care summit.)

Over the past sixteen months, both Biden and Emanuel have expressed concern internally that Obama has been too bold, risking his presidency on big bets. But those disagreements with the President have been fleeting and mostly futile — and, as it happens, unwarranted. So far, most of Obama's big bets have paid off.

Health care's passage is of course the White House's signal achievement, accomplished without revealing the administration's full cognizance (thanks to internal polling and focus groups) of the legislation's stark unpopularity among the public. But beyond health care, Obama acted decisively to stop the world from going into economic depression, after inheriting a mess from his predecessor. Quibble all you wish about the dimensions of the stimulus law or the administration of the TARP or the Detroit bailout, but the actions taken were professionally handled, apparently necessary, and, so far, constructive. Strikingly underrated by the Washington press corps are Obama's gains on education policy, including a willingness to confront the education establishment on standards for both teachers and students. Overseas, Obama has snagged an arms reduction deal with Russia, managed the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq exactly as he promised, eliminated numerous terrorist leaders through an aggressive targeting operation, and laid the groundwork for dealing with Iran and, perhaps, North Korea. (See the five immediate benefits of health reform.)

In the months ahead, the President will likely pass a financial regulation overhaul (despite this weekend's snags); manage the confirmation of a second Supreme Court nominee with relatively little commotion; announce the reduction of the American troop level in Iraq to around 50,000; showcase the under-covered gains on education reform; take advantage of the improving economy to tout his stimulus efforts; and sharpen his "Obama-Biden future versus Bush-Cheney past" argument to help stave off massive Democratic losses in November. He also has a decent chance to pass a small-to-medium-sized energy bill. True, some promises, such as comprehensive immigration reform, will remain undone, but most of his major goals will be completed or well underway.

And after the midterms, assuming the President needs a game-changing move in the wake of significant losses, Emanuel has already played a clever bit of inside-baseball, installing his old friend and Clinton Administration ally Bruce Reid as the staff director of the bipartisan deficit reduction commission that is due to make recommendations in December. If there are big Republican electoral gains, expect the analysis from conservatives and the media to be that the country wanted a check on big spending from Washington. That overriding concern could shape the outcome more than any of Obama's accomplishments or any appreciation for the job he has done for the last two years. The commission's proposals can then be coordinated with an "I get it" message from Obama, providing a bold opening to the second half of his first term as he sets about tackling another campaign promise — long-term deficit reduction. A difficult pledge to achieve perhaps, but, given the president's track record, one that shouldn't be dismissed out of hand.

http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1984460,00.html

I've never lost as much respect for time as much as I did right there.

WOW, what a load of bullshit.

Obviously TIME doesn't realize who the hell he chose as part of his administration. They neglect to point out that these are the EXACT people he campaigned AGAINST and criticized the previous administration for... Let's not mention that part though.

Sounds like the writer of this article is busy sucking on Obama's #######.

[Ban Hammer 13,345]

obama has helped out the firearms industry - i've bought more guns and ammo in the past 2 years than in the previous decade!

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

obama has helped out the firearms industry - i've bought more guns and ammo in the past 2 years than in the previous decade!

you know what they say about a fool and his money