Jump to content
Hilarious Clinton

Man Gets Sucker Punched and Robbed

 Share

37 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

The mugger looked half his age. I don't care how ready he was.... he was 66!!

The advice to look at him and say 'hi' is good advice. They know that you know what they look like.

"The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can’t pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless fiscal policies."

Senator Barack Obama
Senate Floor Speech on Public Debt
March 16, 2006



barack-cowboy-hat.jpg
90f.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline

I don't think it is fair to blame the victim either. Even if he had been 100% on the alert, the thug could have knocked him out all the same, or used a weapon if he was carrying one. Yes, it is smart to be cautious but lack of caution doesn't lessen the blame of the person commiting the crime who bears full responsibility.

Perfectly said...anyways who expects to be assaulted in a McDonalds?

Precisely. Our society has become way too good at blaming victims and explaining away criminal behavior.

I probably would have glanced at the guy if he walked in, but what difference would that have made? Am I supposed to stare at him and get in a defensive position? I have traveled the world and never been attacked because I use a great deal of common sense with regard to personal safety. I do not, however, want to get to the point that I am perpetually paranoid and on the defensive in normal, everyday situations. I hope that most of us are generally trusting of their fellow human beings.

I generally agree with that. However, acknowledging someone by making eye contact and saying 'hello' is using common sense as well as being polite without being on the defensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Mexico
Timeline

All interesting comments but the point is it was an unpredicatable situation as are many interactions with predatory losers. I understand that there are simple ways to diffuse potential violent situations but there are also people out there that are totally out of control and nothing you do or say will stop them from their impulsive actions. It does not matter what color, age or gender you are, they will assault and rob you if they have a chance. Why is it the old man's responsiblity to be concerned about being assaulted and robbed in a place of business?

Saying hi? I don't know, if that loser is so violent it may agitate him further. The poor man was just in the wrong place at the wrong time.

It makes sense not to go out at night alone in questionable areas but this guy was just at McDonalds. He's the victim. Here's another point, what is the responsibilty of the restaraunt owner when it comes to an assault on the premises?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Morocco
Timeline

I don't think it is fair to blame the victim either. Even if he had been 100% on the alert, the thug could have knocked him out all the same, or used a weapon if he was carrying one. Yes, it is smart to be cautious but lack of caution doesn't lessen the blame of the person commiting the crime who bears full responsibility.

Perfectly said...anyways who expects to be assaulted in a McDonalds?

Precisely. Our society has become way too good at blaming victims and explaining away criminal behavior.

I probably would have glanced at the guy if he walked in, but what difference would that have made? Am I supposed to stare at him and get in a defensive position? I have traveled the world and never been attacked because I use a great deal of common sense with regard to personal safety. I do not, however, want to get to the point that I am perpetually paranoid and on the defensive in normal, everyday situations. I hope that most of us are generally trusting of their fellow human beings.

I generally agree with that. However, acknowledging someone by making eye contact and saying 'hello' is using common sense as well as being polite without being on the defensive.

Boy, your days must be very busy, saying hi to everyone you see, just to be polite! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline

I don't think it is fair to blame the victim either. Even if he had been 100% on the alert, the thug could have knocked him out all the same, or used a weapon if he was carrying one. Yes, it is smart to be cautious but lack of caution doesn't lessen the blame of the person commiting the crime who bears full responsibility.

Perfectly said...anyways who expects to be assaulted in a McDonalds?

Precisely. Our society has become way too good at blaming victims and explaining away criminal behavior.

I probably would have glanced at the guy if he walked in, but what difference would that have made? Am I supposed to stare at him and get in a defensive position? I have traveled the world and never been attacked because I use a great deal of common sense with regard to personal safety. I do not, however, want to get to the point that I am perpetually paranoid and on the defensive in normal, everyday situations. I hope that most of us are generally trusting of their fellow human beings.

I generally agree with that. However, acknowledging someone by making eye contact and saying 'hello' is using common sense as well as being polite without being on the defensive.

Boy, your days must be very busy, saying hi to everyone you see, just to be polite! ;)

he'll be easy to pick out in the crowd, he's the one that sounds like crocodile dundee :P

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline

I don't think it is fair to blame the victim either. Even if he had been 100% on the alert, the thug could have knocked him out all the same, or used a weapon if he was carrying one. Yes, it is smart to be cautious but lack of caution doesn't lessen the blame of the person commiting the crime who bears full responsibility.

Perfectly said...anyways who expects to be assaulted in a McDonalds?

Precisely. Our society has become way too good at blaming victims and explaining away criminal behavior.

I probably would have glanced at the guy if he walked in, but what difference would that have made? Am I supposed to stare at him and get in a defensive position? I have traveled the world and never been attacked because I use a great deal of common sense with regard to personal safety. I do not, however, want to get to the point that I am perpetually paranoid and on the defensive in normal, everyday situations. I hope that most of us are generally trusting of their fellow human beings.

I generally agree with that. However, acknowledging someone by making eye contact and saying 'hello' is using common sense as well as being polite without being on the defensive.

Boy, your days must be very busy, saying hi to everyone you see, just to be polite! ;)

he'll be easy to pick out in the crowd, he's the one that sounds like crocodile dundee :P

Croikee!!! :P

Of course, I always take out my hunting knife and scrap it along my razor stubble as I'm saying hello.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
All interesting comments but the point is it was an unpredicatable situation as are many interactions with predatory losers. I understand that there are simple ways to diffuse potential violent situations but there are also people out there that are totally out of control and nothing you do or say will stop them from their impulsive actions. It does not matter what color, age or gender you are, they will assault and rob you if they have a chance. Why is it the old man's responsiblity to be concerned about being assaulted and robbed in a place of business?

Saying hi? I don't know, if that loser is so violent it may agitate him further. The poor man was just in the wrong place at the wrong time.

It makes sense not to go out at night alone in questionable areas but this guy was just at McDonalds. He's the victim. Here's another point, what is the responsibilty of the restaraunt owner when it comes to an assault on the premises?

All good points. Here's something that helps explain what I am talkiing about....

Be Aware of Your Surroundings – The element of surprise is one of the most effective tools the criminal has. Take away that tool.

Watch any nature program on television and you will quickly learn that predators such as lions and wolves tend to target the very young, the elderly and the physically impaired for attack. Criminals are predators and use the same predatory mentality.

The older man turned away from the guy. Any police officer will tell you that in a given situation such as that - late at night, alone in a fast food restaurant is potentially dangerous. Some people here said how could this happen in McDonald's. Many people have been victims of crimes while in a McDonald's or other fast food restaurant. Again, it's the context of the situation - late at night when no one else is around and being alone. If I sound paranoid, so be it. To me it's just common sense. Maybe I watched enough nature shows to understand predatorial behavior... :P

Lucky Strike and Chuck, help me out here. I know you guys are gun advocates. Please help shed some light on how one should properly defend themselves without being paranoid.

Edited by Steven_and_Jinky
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Mexico
Timeline

I do understand your message here and I was not attempting to imply in any way that you are paranoid. I also see that most criminals are opportunists and I know the common sense strategies for self defense. I lived in a pretty rough east coast city for about 10 years and me and some of my friends have been exposed to a few violent experiences by predators. I think you may feel differently if you have been ever been a victim of random violence or lived in a high crime inner city environment for that long.

I understand that predators sense weakness and go in for the kill. The real questions:

Are the criminals today becoming more or less like the animals on your nature shows? (you compared them, not me)

Is our society more concerned about being sympathetic and analytical towards violent criminals than protecting our vulnerable citizens?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
I understand that predators sense weakness and go in for the kill. The real questions:

Are the criminals today becoming more or less like the animals on your nature shows? (you compared them, not me)

Is our society more concerned about being sympathetic and analytical towards violent criminals than protecting our vulnerable citizens?

I think predatorial behavior doesn't change, but the situations that lend themselves to criminals might. Any avenue or situation where they can strike quickly and get away are problematic. If that McDonald's is in a high crime area, they could have a security guard posted there at night. Close circuit cameras don't seem to discourage robberies - they only appear to help with identifying the perpetrator.

As to the second question - I think it is critical if we are to ever circumvent violent criminal behavior to understand how a person becomes a predator. Why is it that this country has more violent criminals than any other country? We should know the answers to questions about how and why if we are ever going to reduce it. Sure, statistically speaking, there will always be a percentage of the population that are violent criminals but we should be concerned if that percentage is much higher here in America than other nations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Serbia
Timeline

that is crazy..

February 1, 2006 - Married in Brooklyn, NY

February 7, 2006 - I-485, I-130, I-131, I-765 Filed

February 18, 2006 - NOA for I-485, I-130, I-131, I-765

March 16, 2006 - Biometrics for I-765, I-485

March 16, 2006 - I-131, I-130 touched

March 18, 2006 - I-765, I-485 touched

March 18, 2006 - RFE for I-485

March 20, 2006 - I-485 touched

March 27, 2006 - RFE sent out

March 31, 2006 - USCIS received the RFE

April 3, 2006 - I-485 touched

April 5, 2006 - I-485 touched

April 6, 2006 - I-485 touched

April 19, 2006 - AP approved

April 24, 2006 - AP received in the mail

April 22, 2006 - EAD touched

April 24, 2006 - EAD approved

April 29, 2006 - EAD received in the mail

May 15, 2006 - Interview letter received

July 12, 2006 - Interview

July 12, 2006 - APPROVED!!!!

August 14, 2006 - Welcome to the US letter and I-130 approval received in the mail

August 15, 2006 - Permanent Resident Card received in the mail

So far so good

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Mexico
Timeline

I understand that predators sense weakness and go in for the kill. The real questions:

Are the criminals today becoming more or less like the animals on your nature shows? (you compared them, not me)

Is our society more concerned about being sympathetic and analytical towards violent criminals than protecting our vulnerable citizens?

I think predatorial behavior doesn't change, but the situations that lend themselves to criminals might. Any avenue or situation where they can strike quickly and get away are problematic. If that McDonald's is in a high crime area, they could have a security guard posted there at night. Close circuit cameras don't seem to discourage robberies - they only appear to help with identifying the perpetrator.

As to the second question - I think it is critical if we are to ever circumvent violent criminal behavior to understand how a person becomes a predator. Why is it that this country has more violent criminals than any other country? We should know the answers to questions about how and why if we are ever going to reduce it. Sure, statistically speaking, there will always be a percentage of the population that are violent criminals but we should be concerned if that percentage is much higher here in America than other nations.

Actually, from my experience predatorial behavior has changed along with the changes with the situations, I think we both see that nothing is static here. There is now more random violence aoccuring among youths due to many factors two of which are lack of parental supervision and lack of a decent education.

When we say "predatorial behavior" that implies there are also more unpredicatable criminal behaviors that are also occuring such as random violence. I hope you can see that.

Yes situations have changed, I totally agree but I also think most people use common sense. I still think that the major load of the responsibility was on McD's here unless there has been a court case that has set a precedent otherwise.

Yes I agree it is wise to study the psychology aspect but I think that protecting the public trumps that card. Once again, it appears we agree in some shades here, we may just have a different logical process.

High crime may have something to do with:

Lack of education

Breakup of the family

Poverty

Just an evil person (some people just suck, period!)

Emphasis on materialism

Boredom and racism and gangs (random violence, mainly teens)

Family tradition (Ma Barker and her gang)

Lack of public vigilance

Lack of effective rehabilitation in prison

there are many others, I'm going to work now, have a good one, later!

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is our society more concerned about being sympathetic and analytical towards violent criminals than protecting our vulnerable citizens?

The man in question not only did not look "vulnerable" (other then an older man) but he also looked well to do. The later made him a prime target.

Add into that he was lax in his judgement of the situation and BAM he got what was coming.

I am not condoning the criminal!

But if you're a mouse, I don't suggest going to the snake hole...

Edited by Marc and Olga

K-1 timeline

05/03/06: NOA1

06/29/06: IMBRA RFE Received

07/28/06: NOA2 received in the mail!

10/06/06: Interview

02/12/07: Olga arrived

02/19/07: Marc and Olga marry

02/20/07: DISNEYLAND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AOS Timeline

03/29/07: NOA1

04/02/07: Notice of biometrics appointment

04/14/07: Biometrics appointment

07/10/07: AOS Interview - Passed.

Done with USCIS until 2009!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Mexico
Timeline

Is our society more concerned about being sympathetic and analytical towards violent criminals than protecting our vulnerable citizens?

The man in question not only did not look "vulnerable" (other then an older man) but he also looked well to do. The later made him a prime target.

Add into that he was lax in his judgement of the situation and BAM he got what was coming.

I am not condoning the criminal!

But if you're a mouse, I don't suggest going to the snake hole...

You're sick. Got what was coming?!?!? So you deserve to be attacked for looking at the menu at McDonald's, which apparently is a "snake hole" :huh: Obviously you are just trying to be ridiculous and stir things up, so I probably should not have even responded.

SEE K-1 HISTORY IN MY TIMELINE

AOS / EAD / AP TIMELINE:

06/30/2006 - I-485, I-765 and I-131 sent to Chicago (via USPS Priority mail) (DAY 1)

07/02/2006 - package received in Chicago (delivery confirmed via USPS)

07/06/2006 - NOA 1 (DAY 7)

07/12/2006 - biometric appointment notice (DAY 13)

07/14/2006 - received biometric appointment notice via mail

07/25/2006 - interview notice (DAY 26)

07/26/2006 - biometrics taken (DAY 27)

07/28/2006 - received interview notice via mail

09/07/2006 - I-485 interview...APPROVED!!!...passport stamped (DAY 70)

09/12/2006 - I-131 approved (DAY 75)

09/13/2006 - received welcome letter via mail

09/15/2006 - I-765 approved (DAY 78)

09/16/2006 - received AP via mail

09/18/2006 - received conditional green card via mail

09/21/2006 - received EAD via mail

07/23/2008 - filed I-751 to lift conditional status

07/28/2008 - NOA 1

08/26/2008 - biometric appointment

12/03/2008 - I-751 approved

12/08/2008 - received 10-year green card via mail

09/07/2009 - eligible for U.S. citizenship!

flag13.gif

flag12.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline

In regards to looking directly at the person and saying 'Hi' I think it would depend on the situation. I've been told repeatedly a good rule of thumb in large cities is 'no eye contact'. If your dealing with a crazy "Hiya" isn't the best approach..I'm wondering if that was the older gentlemans reasoning.

-12/15/06 Mailed off I-129F

-12/19/06 NOA1 via email

-01/05/07 NOA2 via email

-01/13/07 NVC notice via snail mail

-01/25/07 Packet 3 arrives.

-02/22/07 Packet 3 is mailed.

-03/02/07 Medical

-03/13/07 Packet 4 arrives.

-03/16-24/07 Honey visits.

-04/02/07 Interview(Approved)

-04/10/07 Visa arrives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...