Attitudes of Posters

[TBoneTX 45,309]

And Tbone--here. Flowers for you.

Flowers from a Lovely, and one who's a positive, intelligent, literate VJ member? How lovely, si man (ah-CHOO, sneeze man). Edited March 26, 2010 by TBoneTX

[*julez* 124]

Here's what *I* find ironic: when it's the "Attitudes of Moderators" we have to deal with, such as moderators violating the TOS:

http://www.visajourn...ost__p__3824543

From the TOS:

But yeah, it must be a personality conflict.

The rules here don't apply to Deputy Dog, donchayaknow?

[Ban Hammer 13,346]

apparently the sarcasm meter of a few is quite broken.

[mox 298]

apparently the sarcasm meter of a few is quite broken.

Sarcasm is not what you think it means.

And anyway, "Racist or sexist content" is a TOS violation, no matter how you meant it. You can't just say the TOS doesn't apply because you didn't intend it to be a TOS violation, that's not how it works.

[Fandango 1,439]

Edit: nm

But what's a tampo? lol

Edited March 26, 2010 by Happy Bunny

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Why can't I see a pic in that link???

I have images turned off right now but this is the URL

http://thespankingspot.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/husband-spanking-wife.png

I assume it is (or was) a pic of a husband spanking a wife.

Is spanking your wife as a form of discipline sexist? Only if she doesn't like it

[Fandango 1,439]

Yeah for some reason it didn't load the first time I tried it, but this time it did. Strange.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Yeah for some reason it didn't load the first time I tried it, but this time it did. Strange.

I haven't seen it. Is the pic's filename representative of what it actually is, or is there a surprise?

[Fandango 1,439]

I haven't seen it. Is the pic's filename representative of what it actually is, or is there a surprise?

No surprise. Guy spanking a woman. Both fully clothed.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Both fully clothed.

That's a shame.

[trailmix 77]

You know what really grinds my gears, ppl who come on here asking for advice abt their jacked-up realtionships, then get mad at you for giving advice on the truth... If you didnt wanna hear the truth, then dont post in a forum, Pm someone in private...

Your truth is not always someone elses truth? There is a kind way to say something and a rude/snarky way to say something - you have a choice on how to respond.

Now, if you post those private details on VJ you are guaranteed a snarky response, so perhaps the better advice would be, look around, see how other posters are responded to in these types of threads, then make your decision.

BTW, i'm not saying it is you posting that way, I have no idea if you are referring to a particular thread etc.

[meauxna 15]

^^

meauxna!!!

(We should start a "We Love meauxna!" thread to keep this one on topic. )

Si, man.

But you're all crazy!

Yes, if everyone had as much class as meauxna

No, NO class, that's what I'm saying!

I Mo! How have you been???

Hey you, doing well. I thought you hated me though?

Congrats on your signature news!

Mox, man, you've got an axe to griiiiind, pal. Wish I had a good answer for you. Good luck with all that.

[mox 298]

Mox, man, you've got an axe to griiiiind, pal. Wish I had a good answer for you. Good luck with all that.

The only axe I have to grind is the one that says everyone, even Charles, is held to the same standards.

Thanks for the well wishes.

[SuperDuper! 230]

Mox needs to get out more often!

[~Johnny~ 27]

He should be banned. I've been on this site a very long time and no longer help in the upper forums as I've more or less forgotten most of what I used to know, but I did help once upon a time and I did get help once upon a time. No one in my memory was ever that rude. That level of condescension should simply not be acceptable no matter how smart one is perceived to be.

I have only been on VJ a year and I totally agree.....there is "straight advice" and there's the "Prof" telling everybody else they're dumb..attitude!!

Edited March 27, 2010 by ~Johnny~