Jump to content

10 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)

Here's the link. Sounds like a lot of feedback commonly found in democracies (A SPECIAL THANKS TO TO THOSE WHO INCURRED TROLL ACCUSATIONS AND COMPLAINED TO THE THE FOLKS THAT WE PAY TO UPKEEP DEMOCRACY) caused some rational rule making. Here's the link that explains the limitations imposed by IMBRA including, multiple filings, criminal convictions and K3s.

http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/lawsregs/han...IMBRA072106.pdf

Edited by Rick2000
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
Here's the link. Sounds like a lot of feedback commonly found in democracies (A SPECIAL THANKS TO TO THOSE WHO INCURRED TROLL ACCUSATIONS AND COMPLAINED TO THE THE FOLKS THAT WE PAY TO UPKEEP DEMOCRACY) caused some rational rule making. Here's the link that explains the limitations imposed by IMBRA including criminal convictions and K3s.

http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/lawsregs/han...IMBRA072106.pdf

Wow, searching skills, Rick! Let me read it...

I only offer advice - not even legal. Just the plain and simple kind.

Timeline (incompleta)

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Here's the link. Sounds like a lot of feedback commonly found in democracies (A SPECIAL THANKS TO TO THOSE WHO INCURRED TROLL ACCUSATIONS AND COMPLAINED TO THE THE FOLKS THAT WE PAY TO UPKEEP DEMOCRACY) caused some rational rule making. Here's the link that explains the limitations imposed by IMBRA including criminal convictions and K3s.

http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/lawsregs/han...IMBRA072106.pdf

Wow, searching skills, Rick! Let me read it...

Mew, I did not grow up with a lap top on my diaper. Cd u u please promulugate this memo web page to VJers. Thanks for all the dedication you have given to everybody. Rick

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

Here's the link. Sounds like a lot of feedback commonly found in democracies (A SPECIAL THANKS TO TO THOSE WHO INCURRED TROLL ACCUSATIONS AND COMPLAINED TO THE THE FOLKS THAT WE PAY TO UPKEEP DEMOCRACY) caused some rational rule making. Here's the link that explains the limitations imposed by IMBRA including criminal convictions and K3s.

http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/lawsregs/han...IMBRA072106.pdf

Wow, searching skills, Rick! Let me read it...

Mew, I did not grow up with a lap top on my diaper. Cd u u please promulugate this memo web page to VJers. Thanks for all the dedication you have given to everybody. Rick

Will do! :thumbs:

I only offer advice - not even legal. Just the plain and simple kind.

Timeline (incompleta)

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
Here's the link. Sounds like a lot of feedback commonly found in democracies (A SPECIAL THANKS TO TO THOSE WHO INCURRED TROLL ACCUSATIONS AND COMPLAINED TO THE THE FOLKS THAT WE PAY TO UPKEEP DEMOCRACY) caused some rational rule making. Here's the link that explains the limitations imposed by IMBRA including, multiple filings, criminal convictions and K3s.

http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/lawsregs/han...IMBRA072106.pdf

Rick, I take my hat off to you. Your are pretty amazing. Thank you so much for shedding the first real light I have seen on the waiver criteria. You are a gentleman and a scholar. :thumbs:

03/20/2006 - I-129F - Sent FedEX

03/28/2006 - NOA 1 (Receipt) - NOA issued from CSC

07/03/2006 - RFE (Receipt) - RFE Received

07/07/2006 - RFE and Waiver Request - RFE arrived at CSC

09/01/2006 - NOA2 - USCIS Email - Approved w/Waiver

09/22/2006 - Electronic Version - Manila - Embassy Received

12/13/2006 - Packet 4 Received via DHL

12/21/2007 - Medical St. Lukes

12/22/2006 - St. Luke's canceled medical in progress - required additional tests in Jan for upper respiratory congestion.

12/28/2006 - Interview Canceled because of congestion and cough during medical at St. Lukes

01/09/2007 - St. Luke's for 3 consecutive days of "sputum tests and finish medical"

01/10/2007 - St. Luke's for 3 consecutive days of "sputum tests and finish medical"

01/11/2007 - St. Luke's for 3 consecutive days of "sputum tests and finish medical"

01/12/2007 - St. Luke's for pulmonary exam - EVERYTHING CLEAR

01/15/2007 - St. Luke's for vaccinations and release of medical to USE

02/26/2007 - Interview APPROVED - 11+ months for K1 Visa

03/05/2007 - Visa in hand

03/05/2007 - CFO Completed

03/06/2007 - Arrived in Dallas

04/29/2007 - Married in Dallas

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Well, I think it at least explains one thing a lot of people have been wondering about....

"B. Treatment of Forms I-129F approved after March 6, 2006

Cases that were approved in error after the effective date of IMBRA have been identified and returned to USCIS by the Department of State. For such cases, adjudicators should complete a Service Motion to Reopen and Reconsider. The adjudicator should then issue the same RFE described in section A above."

I would guess that the "Service Motion to Reopen and Reconsider" would add a little time to the process for those who were approved and then recalled.

Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. ####### coated bastards with ####### filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive bobble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine.
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
Well, I think it at least explains one thing a lot of people have been wondering about....

"B. Treatment of Forms I-129F approved after March 6, 2006

Cases that were approved in error after the effective date of IMBRA have been identified and returned to USCIS by the Department of State. For such cases, adjudicators should complete a Service Motion to Reopen and Reconsider. The adjudicator should then issue the same RFE described in section A above."

I would guess that the "Service Motion to Reopen and Reconsider" would add a little time to the process for those who were approved and then recalled.

Actually, they've figured out how to do it by now. What takes them time is to actually work on our cases. Once they reopen them, it doesn't take too long for them to send us an RFE.

I only offer advice - not even legal. Just the plain and simple kind.

Timeline (incompleta)

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Here's the link. Sounds like a lot of feedback commonly found in democracies (A SPECIAL THANKS TO TO THOSE WHO INCURRED TROLL ACCUSATIONS AND COMPLAINED TO THE THE FOLKS THAT WE PAY TO UPKEEP DEMOCRACY) caused some rational rule making. Here's the link that explains the limitations imposed by IMBRA including, multiple filings, criminal convictions and K3s.

http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/lawsregs/han...IMBRA072106.pdf

Rick, I take my hat off to you. Your are pretty amazing. Thank you so much for shedding the first real light I have seen on the waiver criteria. You are a gentleman and a scholar. :thumbs:

Thanks for the compliment. We may need to have a double wedding in Baguio and file I-130s?

Keep in touch and take good care of the soon to be asawa.

Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Mexico
Timeline
Posted

Well, I think it at least explains one thing a lot of people have been wondering about....

"B. Treatment of Forms I-129F approved after March 6, 2006

Cases that were approved in error after the effective date of IMBRA have been identified and returned to USCIS by the Department of State. For such cases, adjudicators should complete a Service Motion to Reopen and Reconsider. The adjudicator should then issue the same RFE described in section A above."

I would guess that the "Service Motion to Reopen and Reconsider" would add a little time to the process for those who were approved and then recalled.

Actually, they've figured out how to do it by now. What takes them time is to actually work on our cases. Once they reopen them, it doesn't take too long for them to send us an RFE.

Rick, thanks for the link. :thumbs:

Mew, the section quoted above is the only info offered in reference to the recalled petitions and as we know it is nothing new. The memo does further clarify the position on waivers though.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
Mew, the section quoted above is the only info offered in reference to the recalled petitions and as we know it is nothing new. The memo does further clarify the position on waivers though.

Oh, I know, I thought it was new to Cian though.

I only offer advice - not even legal. Just the plain and simple kind.

Timeline (incompleta)

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...