Jump to content
mox

The new reputation system

By mox in Site-Related Discussion - Updates, Ideas, etc.

 Share

81 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

mox
mox

First, let me just say that visually the new VJ is quite pleasing, very "web 2.0." Nice job, the hard work shows. The bugs are a little annoying right now (especially reading history not carrying ov

mox
mox

Any progress on this?

I'm Gone
I'm Gone

So far it's a bust, I'm still waiting for my first attaboy positive point.

Captain Ewok Veteran

Captain Ewok   1,900

Posted
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Singapore
 Timeline
Posted

yep! Today is "clean up" day on VJ. There were lots of loose ends that needed tied up after the upgrade. I will be sending out a "we are upgraded" email once they are done!

I am an Ewok. I am here to to keep the peace. Please contact me if you have a problem with the site or a complaint regarding a violation of the Terms of Service. For the fastest response please use the 'Contact Us' page to contact me.

TBoneTX Grand Master

TBoneTX   45,668

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
 Timeline
Posted
yep! Today is "clean up" day on VJ. There were lots of loose ends that needed tied up after the upgrade. I will be sending out a "we are upgraded" email once they are done!
Good job, Admiral. Uh, can you please restore all of my previously archived Personal Messages to where they used to be, si man? :)

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Fandango Grand Master

Fandango   1,439

Posted
Filed: Timeline
Posted

I was talking about the stars on each person's home page...the only one that actually had stars highlighted was mine, lol. It said 'user ranking' with 5 stars avail. Everyone else's had no stars, but I could see my own. But now they're gone, lol

Tech-MoLeidy Explorer

Tech-MoLeidy   1

Posted
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Colombia
 Timeline
Posted

Is there a particular reason that other members have the ability to see what topic I'm currently viewing? I'm not exactly sure what function that serves other than give stalkers the ability to stalk...Not that anyone would want to stalk me...I'm just sayin'

event.png

event.png

11 / 13 / 2009 - I 129F SENT

11/18/2009 - NOA 1

11/24/2009 - TOUCHED

03/04/2010 - NOA 2 APPROVED!! WHOOOOOOO HOOOOOOO!!!

03/08/2010 - NVC Received

03/10/2010 - NVC Left

03/15/2010 - Consulate Received

04/02/2010 - Packet 3 Sent Via PDF Files In Email

04/05/2010 - Confirmation Email Received

06/10/2010 - INTERVIEW DATE!!!!!!

06/10/2010 - APPROVED!!!!!! THANKS TO ALL OF YOU AND YOUR HELP!

06/18/2010 - Visa finally issued by embassy!

06/22/2010 - DOMESA HAS VISA!!!! WE HAVE VISA!

06/24/2010 - POE Ft. Lauderdale Fl.

Empress of Groovy Experienced

Empress of Groovy   373

Posted
Filed: AOS (apr) Country: United Kingdom
 Timeline
Posted

Is there a particular reason that other members have the ability to see what topic I'm currently viewing? I'm not exactly sure what function that serves other than give stalkers the ability to stalk...Not that anyone would want to stalk me...I'm just sayin'

When you log in, you can check "log in anonymously" (or something like that), and you'll appear to be offline to other users.

K-1

March 7, 2005: I-129F NOA1

September 20, 2005: K-1 Interview in London. Visa received shortly thereafter.

AOS

December 30, 2005: I-485 received by USCIS

May 5, 2006: Interview at Phoenix district office. Approval pending FBI background check clearance. AOS finally approved almost two years later: February 14, 2008.

Received 10-year green card February 28, 2008

Your Humble Advice Columnist, Joyce

Come check out the most happenin' thread on VJ: Dear Joyce

Click here to see me visiting with my homebodies.

[The grooviest signature you've ever seen is under construction!]

Tech-MoLeidy Explorer

Tech-MoLeidy   1

Posted
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Colombia
 Timeline
Posted

When you log in, you can check "log in anonymously" (or something like that), and you'll appear to be offline to other users.

Oooooh Sneaky Sneaky..... I can be stealthy and sly on Visa Journey :dance:

Not that I would be so inclined. I just thought there ought to be some more options regarding privacy. For example, hiding my email address is necessary because everyone from here to Mars can see it whether they are a member or not. To me I should have the option to let those who are my friends on here (not that I have many) see both my email address and maybe even my IM name without having to share it with the world. I'm not suggesting an in depth privacy policy or anything of that nature. Just a more detailed approach to those options regarding internet privacy. I don't really concern myself so much about the fact people lurking in here know what I'm reading etc. I just think that that particular function serves no real purpose other than to offer those who choose to stalk or play "high school games", as its been referred to, a tool to do so. Rate me, rank me, ridicule me, I'm all good with that but stalk me and spam me.........I'm not so down with that kind of thing.......

Why not have a more in depth check list of those options people might have issues with? That's all I'm suggesting B-)

Tech-Mo

event.png

event.png

11 / 13 / 2009 - I 129F SENT

11/18/2009 - NOA 1

11/24/2009 - TOUCHED

03/04/2010 - NOA 2 APPROVED!! WHOOOOOOO HOOOOOOO!!!

03/08/2010 - NVC Received

03/10/2010 - NVC Left

03/15/2010 - Consulate Received

04/02/2010 - Packet 3 Sent Via PDF Files In Email

04/05/2010 - Confirmation Email Received

06/10/2010 - INTERVIEW DATE!!!!!!

06/10/2010 - APPROVED!!!!!! THANKS TO ALL OF YOU AND YOUR HELP!

06/18/2010 - Visa finally issued by embassy!

06/22/2010 - DOMESA HAS VISA!!!! WE HAVE VISA!

06/24/2010 - POE Ft. Lauderdale Fl.

Kathryn41 Grand Master

Kathryn41   3,205

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
 Timeline
Posted

Actually, historically, that function has been useful in tracking down spammers while they are in the act. We can go where they are spamming and intervene right away. :)

“...Isn't it splendid to think of all the things there are to find out about? It just makes me feel glad to be alive--it's such an interesting world. It wouldn't be half so interesting if we knew all about everything, would it? There'd be no scope for imagination then, would there?”

.― Lucy Maude Montgomery, Anne of Green Gables

5892822976_477b1a77f7_z.jpg

Another Member of the VJ Fluffy Kitty Posse!

mox Veteran

mox   298

Posted
Filed: Timeline
  • Author
Posted

I think the whole ranking thing should be done away with. Or keep it, and make mods have it too. :D

This is something I'm really curious about too. Seems to me that the moderators more often than not have their "moderator hats" off and are participating in the normal ebb and flow of conversation. Moderators are no more or less likely to hand out good advice or bad advice, or whatever else criteria you want to choose for modding a post up or down. And yet from what I understand, moderators are able to use the per-post moderation system just as others are. So why the disparity? Why are mods able to use the per-post moderation system just like all users, but are not subject to per-post moderation themselves?

Oh, I tried to +1 someone, accidentally hit -1, and there's no way to change it. Suckage.

Have a friend +1 the post. :)

TBoneTX Grand Master

TBoneTX   45,668

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
 Timeline
Posted

How unfair is it that the mods get to pad their VJ "heart" totals via their daily activities and we don't, si man? :)

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

TBoneTX Grand Master

TBoneTX   45,668

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
 Timeline
Posted (edited)
Heh do they? Anyway, if I ruled the world we'd get rid of the hearts thing anyway. Encourages too much drive-by and "me too" nonsense. :)
Si, man! Si si si! :lol: Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...