I-134 cosponsor "intend to"

[twowls 217]

So for a co-sponsor, should they check "intend to" support the beneficiary? It says that if you check intend, you should say how and in what monthly amount etc. If you agree they should check "intend," what would they put in the explanation part, since certainly they wouldn't be actually planning on providing any consistent amount for any of the beneficiary's needs...

I think we've established that at least for London, checking "intend" is the way to go for primary sponsor. But what about for a cosponsor?

Thanks everyone.

[Audy_Rob 26]

Then there was the recent posting where the beneficiary was told to get the I-134's redone so that the answers corresponded to each other. One had "intend to" the other person had N/A.

I think the primary should put "intend to" and list any and all necessary expenses including...blah, blah, blad.

I think the co-sponsor should also tick "intend to" and write intend to contribute whenever necessary to provide for the care and well-being of ...blah, blah, blah as required.

[twowls 217]

Hmm...okay then. Ambiguity yay! I guess I'll go with, as you say, coordinating "yes intend" type answers on both forms with a side salad of general supportive sentiments then.

Erg. Thank you.