I am so glad we finally agree on gay marriage

[Wyld Blu 35]

Curb your fantasy. You explained what happened after Loving like it was a fairy tale your mama told you at bedtime, but you think you know about this. I'm done with Constitutional amateurs. Bring red meat next time you want to discuss this.

What I find most amusing about your posts is that you expend a lot of energy disputing or disagreeing with other people's posts, but then don't give alternate explanations or arguments. It is very one sided. You are merely disageeing to disagree, but don't offer the other side.

-Blu

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

You explained what happened after Loving like it was a fairy tale your mama told you at bedtime, but you think you know about this. I'm done with Constitutional amateurs. Bring red meat next time you want to discuss this.

How about you bring the one sole example I asked for to support your claim that states continued to deny interracial marriages after the Supreme Court ruled such discrimination unconstitutional. I asked for one lousy example and you can't even bring that. But you want to see red meat? Then bring it. You can't and you know it. Which is why you keep blowing your smoke that still doesn't impress anyone - well, aside from Danno but he's easily impressed.

Edited March 4, 2010 by Mr. Big Dog

[Peikko 1,575]

How about you bring the one sole example I asked for to support your claim that states continued to deny interracial marriages after the Supreme Court ruled such discrimination unconstitutional. I asked for one lousy example and you can't even bring that. But you want to see red meat? Then bring it. You can't and you know it. Which is why you keep blowing your smoke that still doesn't impress anyone - well, aside from Danno but he's easily impressed.

and Charles.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

and Charles.

Chuck is my buddy - don't mess with him.

[Peikko 1,575]

So, if he's your buddy you don't notice that he's soft on VW? I see

[Wyld Blu 35]

So, if he's your buddy you don't notice that he's soft on VW? I see

Er...um...who's VW?

-Blu-

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

vw is short for virtual wife, which used to be one of sofiyya's previous screen names

[Scott & Lai 12]

After a long thread, often acrimonious but always educational, it was heartening to me to see the VJ community coalesce around a consensus position on gay marriage. Steve may have requested his thread closed, seeing how it had achieved it's purpose, but the issue itself has not died. Today we here on VJ have all agreed on a position and if we can do it, everyone can!

Good job, people.

Tell me again what position we all agreed on?

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Tell me again what position we all agreed on?

Go read. It's right there.

[chri'stina 190]

I wondered too, Scott. The answer is

crapola

.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

How about you bring the one sole example I asked for to support your claim that states continued to deny interracial marriages after the Supreme Court ruled such discrimination unconstitutional. I asked for one lousy example and you can't even bring that. But you want to see red meat? Then bring it. You can't and you know it. Which is why you keep blowing your smoke that still doesn't impress anyone - well, aside from Danno but he's easily impressed.

I can bring it, but why should I when you show up empty headed and making claims that show how little you know? I expect some contribution other than repeated fairy tales on your part to make it worth my time. You, typical liberal, want everything handed to you with no effort. I don't do that. It's too one-sided.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

So, if he's your buddy you don't notice that he's soft on VW? I see

Chuck is alright. We don't always agree - well, we rarely do - but he's a good guy.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

No there isn't. I haven't claimed to know why you do it, I even asked you to explain your denial. You prefer not to, instead you are trying to demonstrate once again that you are smarter than I am. VW, I don't care. I don't think anyone else does either.

More evidence of transference and amateur mind-reading.

What I find most amusing about your posts is that you expend a lot of energy disputing or disagreeing with other people's posts, but then don't give alternate explanations or arguments. It is very one sided. You are merely disageeing to disagree, but don't offer the other side.

-Blu

That makes me fit in here quite well.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Got it. Standard post.

[Peikko 1,575]

More evidence of transference and amateur mind-reading.

That makes me fit in here quite well.

Click your heels together three times, that'll make it true.