Jump to content

45 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
Huh??

He had no interest in breaking ranks with the Democratic party. He was in touch with his constituents in CT and was popular enough to win the general election. It's not his fault that he was betrayed by his own party who supported a more radical candidate (Ned Lamont) who had no credible chance of carrying the state. Democrats did this to themselves. It was not Joe's doing that things turned out this way. I ask you to think back to Gore-Liebermann 2000 and to Joe's 2004 presidential bid, and ask yourself if he was such a disloyal Democrat at that time. Given the ####### the Democratic party has dished out to Joe in the years since, I think it's a credit to him that he's willing to caucus with them at all.

He's done some things in recent years that tarnished his reputation - most recent was his open threat to hold up health care bill if it had any public option, which contradicted his earlier efforts of wanting to expand Medicare.

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
He's done some things in recent years that tarnished his reputation - most recent was his open threat to hold up health care bill if it had any public option, which contradicted his earlier efforts of wanting to expand Medicare.

Steve your such a CHILD!

"I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine."- Ayn Rand

“Your freedom to be you includes my freedom to be free from you.”

― Andrew Wilkow

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
Which America do you live in Steve?? #######?

I'm merely stating my opinion that a politician who loses in a primary should not be allowed to then run under a different party in the general election, particularly if they are the incumbent. It makes it next to impossible to vote them out.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Thailand
Timeline
Posted
He's done some things in recent years that tarnished his reputation - most recent was his open threat to hold up health care bill if it had any public option, which contradicted his earlier efforts of wanting to expand Medicare.

So Ben Nelson and Mary Landrieu go no-holds-barred into the pork barrel, but Joe is the bad guy? I swear it would serve Harry Reid just right to have Joe bolt the caucus entirely. It's disgraceful how they treat him, and he comes back for more.

Filed: Timeline
Posted
I'm merely stating my opinion that a politician who loses in a primary should not be allowed to then run under a different party in the general election, particularly if they are the incumbent. It makes it next to impossible to vote them out.

If the general electorate doesn't want them, they're voted out. If the general electorate does, they shouldn't be voted out by a minority fringe of any party. They should still have the opportunity.

Man is made by his belief. As he believes, so he is.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Thailand
Timeline
Posted
I'm merely stating my opinion that a politician who loses in a primary should not be allowed to then run under a different party in the general election, particularly if they are the incumbent. It makes it next to impossible to vote them out.

You're entitled to your opinion. Forgive me if I disagree stridently.

Show me where in the Constitution parties or primaries are even mentioned. The only requirements I'm aware of to run for Senate that you must be at least 30 years old, be a citizen for nine years, and live in the state represented. I think Joe qualifies.

Posted
If the general electorate doesn't want them, they're voted out. If the general electorate does, they shouldn't be voted out by a minority fringe of any party. They should still have the opportunity.

Fits YOU SO WELL! And all the ILK such as yourselves!

/v/ak8suW-JBzE&hl=en_US&fs=1&"

"I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine."- Ayn Rand

“Your freedom to be you includes my freedom to be free from you.”

― Andrew Wilkow

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
If the general electorate doesn't want them, they're voted out. If the general electorate does, they shouldn't be voted out by a minority fringe of any party. They should still have the opportunity.

I'm sorry, but I disagree. Parties have every right to vote for the person they want to sent to Washington...for better or worse. If a fringe group manages to get someone who was a bad choice, the voters will remember that and that party will pay for it.

If Lieberman didn't want to honor the will of Democratic constituents, he should have declared himself an Independent and bowed out of the Primary. Then I'd see no problem having a 3 way race in the general, but not after the Primaries. By doing so, it effectively nullifies the Primaries.

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
You're entitled to your opinion. Forgive me if I disagree stridently.

Show me where in the Constitution parties or primaries are even mentioned. The only requirements I'm aware of to run for Senate that you must be at least 30 years old, be a citizen for nine years, and live in the state represented. I think Joe qualifies.

I'm just coming from the idea of fairness. Primaries should count for something or lets do away with them and have general elections with more candidates running under the same party. Just a thought.

Filed: Timeline
Posted
I'm just coming from the idea of fairness. Primaries should count for something or lets do away with them and have general elections with more candidates running under the same party. Just a thought.

Primaries are nothing more than an internal mechanism for how a party picks its candidate. Primaries have nothing to do with who is allowed to run as an Independent.

Man is made by his belief. As he believes, so he is.

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
Primaries are nothing more than an internal mechanism for how a party picks its candidate. Primaries have nothing to do with who is allowed to run as an Independent.

Could a candidate who won the Primary for his party decide to then abandon his party run as an Independent?

Filed: Timeline
Posted
Could a candidate who won the Primary for his party decide to then abandon his party run as an Independent?

Sure. All he/she would have to do is neglect to file his papers for that party on time. Then he won't be on the ballot. But he could still file as an I.

Man is made by his belief. As he believes, so he is.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Thailand
Timeline
Posted
Could a candidate who won the Primary for his party decide to then abandon his party run as an Independent?

They cross party lines even after they're seated in Congress! Ever heard of a fella called Arlen Specter, Steve?

Politics is a hardball sport. If you wanna cry about the unfairness of it all, I suggest a non contact pastime. Maybe pat-a-cake.

Filed: Timeline
Posted
They cross party lines even after they're seated in Congress! Ever heard of a fella called Arlen Specter, Steve?

Politics is a hardball sport. If you wanna cry about the unfairness of it all, I suggest a non contact pastime. Maybe pat-a-cake.

We need to find Steven a green job.

Man is made by his belief. As he believes, so he is.

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
Sure. All he/she would have to do is neglect to file his papers for that party on time. Then he won't be on the ballot. But he could still file as an I.

I don't know...it just seems unfair to the party they were running under, especially considering the amount of money spent on elections these days.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...