Jump to content
HandA

Just curious if a gay can petition for a gay benificiary

 Share

25 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

I don't have anything to contribute here but that I'm sorry your friends are going through this (F)

I wonder what USCIS thinks of intersex folks...those without XY or XX genes, but genes like XXX or XYY, XXY, etc.

Naturalization

9/9: Mailed N-400 package off

9/11: Arrived at Dallas, TX

9/17: NOA

9/19: Check cashed

9/23: Received NOA

10/7: Text from USCIS on status update: Biometrics in the mail

10/9: Received Biometrics letter

10/29: Biometrics

10/31: In-line

2/16: Text from USCIS that Baltimore has scheduled an interview...finally!!

2/24: Interview letter received

3/24: Naturalization interview

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Australia
Timeline
I don't have anything to contribute here but that I'm sorry your friends are going through this (F)

I wonder what USCIS thinks of intersex folks...those without XY or XX genes, but genes like XXX or XYY, XXY, etc.

I believe it's what's on the birth certificate that matters.

Edited by Vanessa&Tony
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
No. Federal law does not recognize same sex marriage as existing anywhere and does not require other states to honor same sex marriages from Vermont, massachusetts, etc. A post op transexual is another sex, it is not "same sex" marriage. what the BIA has said is that they do not care how the woman became a woman, but she is now "officially" a woman and can officially marry a man. No such distinction exists for same sex marraige.

Thank you and Audy Rob for your valuable informative input.

My friend's UK partner now understands he has no choice but put all effort into going down the investor visa route $1million (out of the question, he is not Donald Trump) to raise or $500,000 (which is achievable for him with massive effort and personal sacrifice) if he is prepared to set up business and hire USC's in a high unemployment area.

If this isn't an example of the extent someone will go to in the name of love, legal immigration and determination to be an honorable human being in one's life time, then nothing is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Greenland
Timeline

Your not able to at this time. I do however find it weird, I'm not able to disclose much. But someone has petitioned for their partner, and it was actually approved with USCIS. DOES NOT MEAN THEY WAS ISSUED A VISA. But it was approved. Anyone got $500 to play around with? :whistle:

I'm really sorry to hear this, I think its unfair myself and I work with people in the immigration process. :(

When they do any man from the UK want a green card? LOL ;)

Edited by Cisexpert

------------------- Time line -------------------

02/01/2011 - I-129F sent VIA Express mail.

/////////////////////////////////////////

02/09/2011 - NOA1 Received

////////////////////////////////////////

05/02/2011 - NOA2 Received

05/02/2011 - Plane ticket bought. Departing for Denmark 05/15/2011.

Ameq has been given a 6 month life expectancy, Please keep her in your prayers.

///////////////////////////////////////

05/30/2011 - National Visa Center Received

//////////////////////////////////////

07/06/2011 - Copenhagen Received

/////////////////////////////////////

07/10/2011 - 7:21 AM - Kolding Sygehus, Kolding, Denmark

Ameq passed away, process withdrawn.

--------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------- LEGAL AGREEMENT -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By taking my opinion or advice, hearby giving up any rights or legal actions that can be used against me under a court of law. The information that has been provided is a basic knowledge of the immigration process and should be taken with a grain of salt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: India
Timeline

Marriage falls under the domain of the individual state, whereas immigration is a federal issue.

03/27/2009: Engaged in Ithaca, New York.
08/17/2009: Wedding in Calcutta, India.
09/29/2009: I-130 NOA1
01/25/2010: I-130 NOA2
03/23/2010: Case completed.
05/12/2010: CR-1 interview at Mumbai, India.
05/20/2010: US Entry, Chicago.
03/01/2012: ROC NOA1.
03/26/2012: Biometrics completed.
12/07/2012: 10 year card production ordered.

09/25/2013: N-400 NOA1

10/16/2013: Biometrics completed

12/03/2013: Interview

12/20/2013: Oath ceremony

event.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I understand it, this is exactly the sort of scenario that the federal Defense of Marriage Act (a Bush-era law) was enacted to preclude. The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) states that for federal government purposes, marriage is defined as the union between one man and one woman. States are free to enact whatever laws they want regarding marriage--the DOMA recognizes that--but the DOMA means that the federal government is not required to recognized homesexual unions as marriages. What this means is that wherever in federal statutes the word "marriage" may appear, the federal government can take the position that the statute does not apply to a homosexual union. I haven't read the immigration law articles that someone cited above--I'm sure they're interesting reading--but my guess is that the conclusion is that the USCIS will not recognize a same-sex petitioner as being eligible, due, if for no other reason, to the effect of the DOMA. To petition for a K-1, the petition has to be able to legally marry the beneficiary, and although one could argue that this can be done in some states, I have to believe that the federal government (USCIS) would not recognize the result as a legal marriage, so the USCIS would not recognize the K-1 petition. I believe the constitutionality of the DOMA has been called into question, so it's anyone's guess if the Supreme Court or Congress will change this state of affairs in the future.

12/31/2009 Married in the U.S. on K-1 visa

01/28/2010 received copy of marriage certificate (what a delay!)

02/01/2010 AOS (I-485/I-765/I-131/I-1145) package sent to USCIS via FedEx (Day 0)

02/02/2010 AOS package received at USCIS confirmed by FedEx (Day 1)

02/08/2010 NOA1 for I-485/I-765/I-131, noting Date of Receipt 02/02/2010 (Day 7)

02/10/2010 Biometrics Letter date, noting appointment on 02/26/2010 (Day 9)

02/23/2010 Notice of Transfer to CSC (Day 22)

02/26/2010 Completed Biometrics Appointment (Day 25)

03/01/2010 I-765 status first available on-line (Touch) (Day 28)

03/03/2010 I-485 status first available on-line (Touch) (Day 30)

04/12/2010 EAD Card Production Ordered (via text message and on-line) (Day 70)

04/12/2010 AP approved and mailed (status shown on-line) (Day 70)

04/17/2010 AP received in mail (Day 75)

04/19/2010 EAD Card received in mail (Day 77)

07/28/2010 AOS Card Production Ordered (via text message and on-line) (Day 177)

08/03/2010 Welcome Letter received in mail (Day 183)

08/06/2010 Green Card received in mail (Day 186)

04/30/2012 Remove Conditions (I-751) sent to USCIS

06/25/2012 Completed Biometrics Appointment

01/30/2013 Card Production Ordered

02/07/2013 Green Card received in mail

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
As I understand it, this is exactly the sort of scenario that the federal Defense of Marriage Act (a Bush-era law) was enacted to preclude. The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) states that for federal government purposes, marriage is defined as the union between one man and one woman. States are free to enact whatever laws they want regarding marriage--the DOMA recognizes that--but the DOMA means that the federal government is not required to recognized homesexual unions as marriages. What this means is that wherever in federal statutes the word "marriage" may appear, the federal government can take the position that the statute does not apply to a homosexual union. I haven't read the immigration law articles that someone cited above--I'm sure they're interesting reading--but my guess is that the conclusion is that the USCIS will not recognize a same-sex petitioner as being eligible, due, if for no other reason, to the effect of the DOMA. To petition for a K-1, the petition has to be able to legally marry the beneficiary, and although one could argue that this can be done in some states, I have to believe that the federal government (USCIS) would not recognize the result as a legal marriage, so the USCIS would not recognize the K-1 petition. I believe the constitutionality of the DOMA has been called into question, so it's anyone's guess if the Supreme Court or Congress will change this state of affairs in the future.

It's a total non starter for any gay relationship and probably won't change in our lifetimes.

If there is anyone on this site with any knowledge/first hand experience of the investor visa process, I would be most grateful. I'm not holding my breath here guys, I don't think the likes of Bill Gates lurk here!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Scotland
Timeline
I believe it's what's on the birth certificate that matters.

Which is unfortunate given that in MOST cases where child is born with both types of sexual organs, most parents "chose" the wrong sex for their child. Now the child can be genetically tested in advance to find out if they are genetically male or female.

Sorry I watch too much Discovery Channel... XD

"You don't marry someone you can live with, you marry the person you can't live without."

Mailed K-1 on 2-6-10

USCIS received packet on 2-8-10

NOA 1: Received 2-16-10

NOA 2: Approved 4-29-10 (72 Days)

NVC Forwarded Petition to London- 5-6-10

NVC Letter Received: 5-7-1010

London Received Packet: 5-14-10

London Mailed Packet to Rob: 5-18-10

Packet 3 Received by Rob: 5-22-2010

Packet 3 paperwork mailed to Rob 6-12-10

Medical- July 8, 2010

Everything mailed to Embassy 7-19-10

Interview Date: 9-14-10- Approved pending non-machine washed replacement passport.

Entry to US- 10-6-10 POE- Newark

Wedding- 10-23-10

AOS

Mailed AOS paperwork to the Chicago lockbox 1-7-11

Delivery Notification 1-10-11

Text stating application was received 1-20-11

Check Cashed 1-21-11

NOA 1 received 1-22-11

Biometrics letter received 1-29--11

Biometrics appointment 2-24-11

Received notice- I-485 has been transferred to the California Service Center 2-9-11.

3-11-11 - EAD production ordered

3-19-11- EAD Received

3-31-2011- AOS approved without interview

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow...i never even thought of that question. that's an interesting question. I myslef do not know the answer but perhaps someone can help you. God Bless!

anikitten.gif
ROC Sent: 2012-12-03
Arrived: 2012-12-07
NOA: 2012-12-10
Biometrics: 2013-01-08

Approved: 2013-05-10

event.png
event.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...