Jump to content
EZ3145

Visa Waiver Means Tourist Visa???

 Share

27 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

If you come to the States on a visa waiver program to visit a relative, does that mean you hold a tourist visa and not eligible for social security??

As mentioned in your other post.

The Visa Waiver Program (VWP) enables nationals of 35 participating countries to travel to the United States for tourism or business (visitor visa purposes only) for stays of 90 days or less without obtaining a visa.

http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/without/...t_1990.html#vwp

I think you might be missing some details about what process your brother is filing for his wife.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Ghana
Timeline
As mentioned in your other post.

The Visa Waiver Program (VWP) enables nationals of 35 participating countries to travel to the United States for tourism or business (visitor visa purposes only) for stays of 90 days or less without obtaining a visa.

http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/without/...t_1990.html#vwp

I think you might be missing some details about what process your brother is filing for his wife.

My brother married his wife and did wedding in Australia. She came to visit him and I think she came on the visitor visa. While she's here, my brother filed for her and he's got appointment for fingerprints already. He's wondering if he can apply for social security number for her. I-94 expires on feb. 17.

can he apply for SSN for her?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Timeline

Either she came with a visitor's visa, which is the B2, or she came without a visa, in which case she would have taken advantage of the Visa Waiver Program (VWP). None of this matters, as she entered as a visitor with the intent to adjust status, which is visa fraud.

No, he can't get a SSN for her unless she has adjusted status, and he can thank Jesus Christ and the 7 dwarfs if she's not denied adjustment of status for the fraud and be deported back to the Outbacks.

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all . . . . The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans, English-Americans, French-Americans, Scandinavian-Americans or Italian-Americans, each preserving its separate nationality, each at heart feeling more sympathy with Europeans of that nationality, than with the other citizens of the American Republic . . . . There is no such thing as a hyphenated American who is a good American. The only man who is a good American is the man who is an American and nothing else.

President Teddy Roosevelt on Columbus Day 1915

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Ghana
Timeline
Either she came with a visitor's visa, which is the B2, or she came without a visa, in which case she would have taken advantage of the Visa Waiver Program (VWP). None of this matters, as she entered as a visitor with the intent to adjust status, which is visa fraud.

No, he can't get a SSN for her unless she has adjusted status, and he can thank Jesus Christ and the 7 dwarfs if she's not denied adjustment of status for the fraud and be deported back to the Outbacks.

Let USCIS decide if that's visa fraud not you. I just needed to know if she can apply for SSN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Timeline

Oh, it definitely is visa fraud, that's as clear as it gets, as someone married to a USC, intending to adjust status to an immigrant would require an Immigrant visa, in your case an CR-1.

Even I can't think of a reason how to explain what you are trying to pull off, as you didn't get married out of the blue (surprise!), but where married already by the time she abused the WVP with clear immigrant intentions, and I'm pretty innovative and helpful when it comes to interpreting rules in a certain way to make 'em fit. Trust me, If I--a guy who by his own admission--was illegal for almost 14 years, tells you you're in deep sh*t, it's because you're in deep sh*t.

The make-or-break question is if the Immigration Officer will jump on the fraud or not, and that question will remain open until you guys sit in the hot chair. And hot it will be, I'm sure of it.

I did answer your question regarding the SSN unmistakably: no you cannot apply for one; they won't accept her application at this time as visitors to the US, married or not, have no legal basis to apply for a SSN, and until your AOS is decided upon one way or another, she's a legally a visitor in limbo.

You're welcome.

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the very best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans, Americans born abroad. But a hyphenated American is not an American at all . . . . The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans, English-Americans, French-Americans, Scandinavian-Americans or Italian-Americans, each preserving its separate nationality, each at heart feeling more sympathy with Europeans of that nationality, than with the other citizens of the American Republic . . . . There is no such thing as a hyphenated American who is a good American. The only man who is a good American is the man who is an American and nothing else.

President Teddy Roosevelt on Columbus Day 1915

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-3 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Let USCIS decide if that's visa fraud not you. I just needed to know if she can apply for SSN.

Just Bob is right, read the back of the I-94W. It gives very specific limitations. Among them, adjustment of status is not permitted. Neither is overstay. You would do well to listen to the sound advice of those to whom you ask questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Iran
Timeline

Yes the VWP is for visitors. It is not an immigrant visa, it is not a work visa. To obtain a social security number you must have the right to work in the US which a visitor does not thus there is no basis to apply for a social security number.

But don't take our word for it, have her go to the social security office and apply for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
I just needed to know if she can apply for SSN.

Yes, she can apply.... they won't accept the application but she can apply

Edited by payxibka

YMMV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just needed to know if she can apply for SSN.

Hopefully, they applied for an employment authorization document (EAD) at the same time they filed for adjustment of status. Once she has the EAD, she can use it to apply for a SSN.

05/16/2005 I-129F Sent

05/28/2005 I-129F NOA1

06/21/2005 I-129F NOA2

07/18/2005 Consulate Received package from NVC

11/09/2005 Medical

11/16/2005 Interview APPROVED

12/05/2005 Visa received

12/07/2005 POE Minneapolis

12/17/2005 Wedding

12/20/2005 Applied for SSN

01/14/2005 SSN received in the mail

02/03/2006 AOS sent (Did not apply for EAD or AP)

02/09/2006 NOA

02/16/2006 Case status Online

05/01/2006 Biometrics Appt.

07/12/2006 AOS Interview APPROVED

07/24/2006 GC arrived

05/02/2007 Driver's License - Passed Road Test!

05/27/2008 Lifting of Conditions sent (TSC > VSC)

06/03/2008 Check Cleared

07/08/2008 INFOPASS (I-551 stamp)

07/08/2008 Driver's License renewed

04/20/2009 Lifting of Conditions approved

04/28/2009 Card received in the mail

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Vietnam
Timeline

Its clear that based on the OP's posts the spouse entered on a visitor visaeven though an actual visa is waived through VWP. She has already married a USC abroad and the POE didn't see any issue with her visiting. They can file AOS, but one must realize that there is a great deal of risk associated with this. Should USCIS determine that the spouse entered the US with the intent to immigrate rather than just visit, a determination of fraud could get the spouse banned for life. She can apply for AOS, She can apply for ss# she can apply for a work permit, but it all boils down to what the USCIS thinks about the intent.

If I was the one looking at a case where someone married abroad and then came here on a visitor visa and began doing everything possible to immigrate... I would deny and slap them with a lifetime Ban...

Edited by ScottThuy

"Every one of us bears within himself the possibilty of all passions, all destinies of life in all its forms. Nothing human is foreign to us" - Edward G. Robinson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its clear that based on the OP's posts the spouse entered on a visitor visaeven though an actual visa is waived through VWP. She has already married a USC abroad and the POE didn't see any issue with her visiting. They can file AOS, but one must realize that there is a great deal of risk associated with this. Should USCIS determine that the spouse entered the US with the intent to immigrate rather than just visit, a determination of fraud could get the spouse banned for life. She can apply for AOS, She can apply for ss# she can apply for a work permit, but it all boils down to what the USCIS thinks about the intent.

If I was the one looking at a case where someone married abroad and then came here on a visitor visa and began doing everything possible to immigrate... I would deny and slap them with a lifetime Ban...

Intent of the beneficiary when entering with visitor status will not be an issue that will deny the immediate relative of a USC an adjustment of status. If you were the one looking at the case, you would not be able to deny them and slap them with a lifetime ban based on that intent unless you are also willing to break the law by disregarding laws that apply to the adjudication.

Edited by john_and_marlene

05/16/2005 I-129F Sent

05/28/2005 I-129F NOA1

06/21/2005 I-129F NOA2

07/18/2005 Consulate Received package from NVC

11/09/2005 Medical

11/16/2005 Interview APPROVED

12/05/2005 Visa received

12/07/2005 POE Minneapolis

12/17/2005 Wedding

12/20/2005 Applied for SSN

01/14/2005 SSN received in the mail

02/03/2006 AOS sent (Did not apply for EAD or AP)

02/09/2006 NOA

02/16/2006 Case status Online

05/01/2006 Biometrics Appt.

07/12/2006 AOS Interview APPROVED

07/24/2006 GC arrived

05/02/2007 Driver's License - Passed Road Test!

05/27/2008 Lifting of Conditions sent (TSC > VSC)

06/03/2008 Check Cleared

07/08/2008 INFOPASS (I-551 stamp)

07/08/2008 Driver's License renewed

04/20/2009 Lifting of Conditions approved

04/28/2009 Card received in the mail

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline
Intent of the beneficiary when entering with visitor status will not be an issue that will deny the immediate relative of a USC an adjustment of status. If you were the one looking at the case, you would not be able to deny them and slap them with a lifetime ban based on that intent unless you are also willing to break the law by disregarding laws that apply to the adjudication.

I remember when you first brought this to my (and other people's) attention a while back. I took time to review the Adjudicator's Field Manual, and it does indeed cite cases that back up what you say here. For anyone that disputes what john_and_marlene has stated, note that he has chosen his words very carefully. While you cannot be denied based on your intent, you can be based on misrepresentation at the POE or on any related forms filled out when applying for a non-immigrant or singe-intent visa.

K1: 01/15/2009 (mailed I-129F) - 06/23/2009 (visa received)

AOS: 08/08/2009 (mailed I-485, I-765, & I-131) - 10/29/2009 (received GC)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember when you first brought this to my (and other people's) attention a while back. I took time to review the Adjudicator's Field Manual, and it does indeed cite cases that back up what you say here. For anyone that disputes what john_and_marlene has stated, note that he has chosen his words very carefully. While you cannot be denied based on your intent, you can be based on misrepresentation at the POE or on any related forms filled out when applying for a non-immigrant or singe-intent visa.

As a practical matter, I think you will find very little effort on the part of USCIS to look for other reasons to deny an application that can eventually be overturned on appeal or successful with waivers and/or reapplications. They are not in the business of increasing their backlog where the eventual result, after substantial additional effort by both the applicants and the USCIS, will be a successful adjustment.

05/16/2005 I-129F Sent

05/28/2005 I-129F NOA1

06/21/2005 I-129F NOA2

07/18/2005 Consulate Received package from NVC

11/09/2005 Medical

11/16/2005 Interview APPROVED

12/05/2005 Visa received

12/07/2005 POE Minneapolis

12/17/2005 Wedding

12/20/2005 Applied for SSN

01/14/2005 SSN received in the mail

02/03/2006 AOS sent (Did not apply for EAD or AP)

02/09/2006 NOA

02/16/2006 Case status Online

05/01/2006 Biometrics Appt.

07/12/2006 AOS Interview APPROVED

07/24/2006 GC arrived

05/02/2007 Driver's License - Passed Road Test!

05/27/2008 Lifting of Conditions sent (TSC > VSC)

06/03/2008 Check Cleared

07/08/2008 INFOPASS (I-551 stamp)

07/08/2008 Driver's License renewed

04/20/2009 Lifting of Conditions approved

04/28/2009 Card received in the mail

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline

The biggest problem with Adjusting from Canadian-Visitor/Visa-Waiver/Tourist-Visa is not the likelihood of approval. Let's face it, the reality is that lots of people adjust from these and the vast majority are successful. No, the problem is downside risk: the consequences if you are denied.. The potential consequences to a failed AOS from a tourist visa can be much worse - more permanent, and much harder to overcome. It's very significantly riskier. You can face significantly harsher penalties, up to a lifetime ban if they find misrepresentation, and you have much less, if any grounds for appeal. It's just not a good idea. It doesn't matter how many people get away with it, if you don't. Much better to do everything by the book.

DON'T PANIC

"It says wonderful things about the two countries [Canada and the US] that neither one feels itself being inundated by each other's immigrants."

-Douglas Coupland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...