Pentagon to rank global warming as destabilising force

[luckytxn 2,265]

Here are a few more sites to see the other side.

http://blog.heritage.org/2008/12/11/scient...l-warming-case/

[luckytxn 2,265]

This is why I say they are either with them or against them.

http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008220

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Every one of these receive funding from the FEDs to toe the line. They are either with them are against them. Remember they are using data that has been proven faked and would not look at any reports or data that showed global warming to be false. This is called supression.

LOL...ok, so then why were they conflicting with the Right Wing's position on global warming when there was a Republican President in the oval office? Fail. Ironically, it was during Bush's administration that reports from such bodies of science were edited and suppressed by the White House.

see here:

The Environmental Protection Agency on Tuesday released a copy of a long-suppressed report by officials in the George W. Bush administration concluding that, based on the science, the government should begin regulating greenhouse-gas emissions because global warming posed serious risks to the country. The report, technically known as an "endangerment finding," was prepared in 2007, but the Bush White House refused to make it public because the administration opposed regulating the gases most scientists see as the major cause of global warming.

The existence of the finding — and the refusal of the Bush White House to make it public — were previously known. The Bush EPA draft was released in response to a public-records request under the Freedom of Information Act.

The document "demonstrates that in 2007 the science was as clear as it is today," said Adora Andy, an EPA spokeswoman. "The conclusions reached then by EPA scientists should have been made public and should have been considered."

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/poli..._climate14.html

So you gotta ask yourselves...if these bodies of science are kowtowing to the will of the Fed Gov't (which was Bush at the time), why would they publish something like this? Wait...don't tell me...because they're liberal?

[luckytxn 2,265]

http://www.truth-it.net/anti_global_warming_scientists.html

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Here is a petition form over 31,000 American scientists that say global warming is bunk. There are also some anti global warming articles there too.

http://www.oism.org/pproject/

Py2XVILHUjQ&feature=player_embedded#

[luckytxn 2,265]

LOL...ok, so then why were they conflicting with the Right Wing's position on global warming when there was a Republican President in the oval office? Fail. Ironically, it was during Bush's administration that reports from such bodies of science were edited and suppressed by the White House.

see here:

So you gotta ask yourselves...if these bodies of science are kowtowing to the will of the Fed Gov't (which was Bush at the time), why would they publish something like this? Wait...don't tell me...because they're liberal?

You are about to fail so watch it. Bush is the same as both major parties have a huge stake in this.

[luckytxn 2,265]

http://www.climategate.com/

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405...limategate.com/

Edited February 2, 2010 by luckytxn

[luckytxn 2,265]

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdel...global-warming/

[one...two...tree 2,762]

You are about to fail so watch it. Bush is the same as both major parties have a huge stake in this.

What other conspiracy theories do you believe?

[luckytxn 2,265]

Ok I have to get to bed so I want to say thanks for playing. There are lots more and I will try to post more but maybe when other come in they can also post more links form alternate sources then the ones that you sheep are used to.

I personally have no problems with alternate forms of fuel but want a fair playing field and not one that is faked and falsified and trying to tell me is the truth when it is not so. Our history has shown that we will come up with something revolutionary that will solve the problems we encounter but the government needs to get out of the way for this to happen. Almost every advance that has ever happened has been due to outstanding people stepping up and hitting homeruns when needed. The government is between the batter and the pitcher here to stop this.

What other conspiracy theories do you believe?

I thought you may have actually something on the ball there but I guess I was wrong. You lose. Next!!!

[one...two...tree 2,762]

I thought you may have actually something on the ball there but I guess I was wrong. You lose. Next!!!

Your ideas about Global Warming being a hoax are conspiratorial. You believe the bodies of science have cooked the books because they are directed by a higher source, the government. That's called a conspiracy theory.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

oRSOkHU2ZcQ

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Io-Tb7vTamY