New York woman falls, rips Picasso painting

[웃 910]

One of my brother's favorite artists is Odd Nerdrum:

[Amby 490]

Picasso isn't art? the American school system has failed me once again

[Peikko 1,575]

<--- uneducated

There is nothing wrong with enjoying the aesthetically pleasing in fact, there is a heck of a lot that is good about doing just that.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

<--- uneducated

May I suggest a cozy Kinkade...

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

There is nothing wrong with enjoying the aesthetically pleasing in fact, there is a heck of a lot that is good about doing just that.

Right. I enjoy things (animate and inanimate) that are aesthetically pleasing.

[Amby 490]

I made a thread to discuss artist. Please proceed to the thread so we can talk about our favorites

[Joseph & Ana 0]

An uneducated person will define art as something that is aesthetically pleasing, the truly ignorant something that is aesthetically pleasing if they personally so determine.

No.. An ignoramus defines art as having some deeper meaning to history which is a load of ####### to make people feel important while critiquing art. People with no real purpose need those things to feed off of. Its all relative. Its my opinion that this piece is a piece of #######, and someone else may like it. To each their own. And yes, you are an elitist... you perceive yourself as smarter or more important than you really are. The very definition.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

An ignoramus defines art as having some deeper meaning to history which is a load of #######...

So no art ever does? Is that your argument?

[Amby 490]

so do you!

[Joseph & Ana 0]

So no art ever does? Is that your argument?

No, i'm not saying that. Its not there in my post.

[Peikko 1,575]

May I suggest a cozy Kinkade...

Just the ticket.

[Joseph & Ana 0]

Just the ticket.

I.e. The libs here, Cleo and Gallstone are implying that Kinkaid is not important (which he isn't) but he sure makes some nice paintings.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

No, i'm not saying that. Its not there in my post.

Ok, just attempting to clarify. Thanks

[Joseph & Ana 0]

They'll extrapolate that because I dont like this, that i am an uneducated fool (not true) that despises all art unless its Thomas Kinkaid (which I don't get the connection). They always have some sort of score to settle and they'll use dishonesty to try and prove it.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

I.e. The libs here, Cleo and Gallstone are implying that Kinkaid is not important (which he isn't) but he sure makes some nice paintings.

Which of these two paintings do you like better?