they seem to be approving on IMBRA recieved date

[qqq777iii888 0]

I believe this because all of the approvals from the CSC had returned their IMBRA rfe's immediatly, most recieved by the CSC no later than July 5th.

[William33 110]

Yeah, that was mentioned before by GaryC. I believe this to be very likely.

A few more days, and we will all be able to confirm this theory. More data is required for a proper analysis.

Good luck!!!

I believe this because all of the approvals from the CSC had returned their IMBRA rfe's immediatly, most recieved by the CSC no later than July 5th.

[qqq777iii888 0]

Yeah, that was mentioned before by GaryC. I believe this to be very likely.

A few more days, and we will all be able to confirm this theory. More data is required for a proper analysis.

Good luck!!!

I believe this because all of the approvals from the CSC had returned their IMBRA rfe's immediatly, most recieved by the CSC no later than July 5th.

ACTUALLY MY IMBRA RFE WAS RECIEVED BY THE USCIS ON THE 10TH vs YOURS THE 11TH.

I BET THOSE EXTRA DAYS IT TOOK US TO GET THAT FORM BACK TO THEM WILL COST US 20 DAYS.....STILL A APPROVAL IN 20 DAYS FROM NOW IS MUCH BETTER THEN WE FEARED, RIGHT???

[MrMrsKnight 0]

I think it's fair actually.... better than sit on those petitions and wait to approve according to NOA1, IMO.

But even though it's fair, it sucks a big time for me! I only returned the RFE on the 19th.... oh well... it's just frustrating that I couldn't send it back sooner.

[rlt 0]

We should remember that every case is different.

Even if they are processing it by RFE reveived date, it doesn´t mean the approvals will follow the pattern.

They will PROCESS the case by this order. What they will do with each case can´t be predicted.

[William33 110]

Ah, you forgot the processing order, let me remind you:

[hockeygal 0]

edited because I am tired of being negative and grumpy!!

Edited July 27, 2006 by hockeygal

[MrMrsKnight 0]

Ah, you forgot the processing order, let me remind you:

That made me smile

[luvaLimey 0]

Ah, you forgot the processing order, let me remind you:

hahahahaha! sooo true!

I think that's how they decided when to send out the RFE as well!

[Maurry88 0]

I think it's fair actually.... better than sit on those petitions and wait to approve according to NOA1, IMO.

But even though it's fair, it sucks a big time for me! I only returned the RFE on the 19th.... oh well... it's just frustrating that I couldn't send it back sooner.

Don't feel bad look at me.On june 30th i recieved an e mail reqesting additional info.On July 17th i recieve an e mail saying that my embra form was mailed back.not delivirable,so i called them and told them.So i was touched on July 17,so imagine that is when they mailed it again.And now i still have not recieved it

[sowens 0]

I got my IMBRA RFE on the 3rd July and mailed it straight back out, nothing yet, I hope your right and we hear something soon, I am seriously considering consulting a magic 8 ball...LMAO I may get a more reasonable answer than what they have given me. Good luck!!

Sherry

[hockeygal 0]

I think it's fair actually.... better than sit on those petitions and wait to approve according to NOA1, IMO.

But even though it's fair, it sucks a big time for me! I only returned the RFE on the 19th.... oh well... it's just frustrating that I couldn't send it back sooner.

It is fair to process things you have rather than wait for thins you don't, but if they have the RFEs back, even later in the month, of petitions from earlier on, why let those sit at the back of the line? THis is what they seem to be doing. They say they will respect NOA1 dates, but they don't seem to be. It seems to be a whole new queue!

[no name 1]

It is fair to process things you have rather than wait for thins you don't, but if they have the RFEs back, even later in the month, of petitions from earlier on, why let those sit at the back of the line? THis is what they seem to be doing. They say they will respect NOA1 dates, but they don't seem to be. It seems to be a whole new queue!

True. But as Yodrak said earlier, it makes no sense to keep reshuffling piles. It wouldn't have been hard had there BEEN piles to begin with but who knows.

We could debate it for weeks. Oh, wait, haven't we already?

[William33 110]

I think it's fair actually.... better than sit on those petitions and wait to approve according to NOA1, IMO.

But even though it's fair, it sucks a big time for me! I only returned the RFE on the 19th.... oh well... it's just frustrating that I couldn't send it back sooner.

It is fair to process things you have rather than wait for thins you don't, but if they have the RFEs back, even later in the month, of petitions from earlier on, why let those sit at the back of the line? THis is what they seem to be doing. They say they will respect NOA1 dates, but they don't seem to be. It seems to be a whole new queue!

They probably are respecting the NOA-1 dates. "Well Bob, look at this one dated March 10th" - Bob: "very respectable, put that one over there, it doesn't have enough dust on it yet"!!!

They just ain't approving them.

Edited July 27, 2006 by William33

[hockeygal 0]

They probably are respecting the NOA-1 dates. "Well Bob, look at this one dated March 10th" - Bob: "very respectable, put that one over there, it doesn't have enough dust on it yet"!!!

They just ain't approving them.