I, for one, am glad he is back

[Ali G. 37]

Everyone's favorite racist hate monger. Please continue.

Yeah, there is not better argument and response to every discussion than the 'you once used the n word'.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Yeah, there is not better argument and response to every discussion than the 'you once used the n word'.

Which you did.

[Ali G. 37]

Which you did.

Is it not racist to tell a foreigner who has nothing to do with slavery that they are not allowed to use this word, because they are white. However, it's totally acceptable for someone black to use it.

Hence the reason for using it in the first place. Two sets of rules now seem to apply. Evidently the application of these rules are basically based on one's skin color, which is racist.

Edited January 11, 2010 by Booyah

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Is it not racist to tell a foreigner who has nothing to do with slavery that they are not allowed to use this word, because they are white, however, it's totally acceptable for someone black to use it.

So you're not denying you said it. Instead, you're claiming there's nothing wrong with you saying it.

Is that about right?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Oh dear

There's no free speech until you can freely use every word without consequence.

What a quaint idea.

[Ali G. 37]

So you're not denying you said it. Instead, you're claiming there's nothing wrong with you saying it.

Is that about right?

Neither confirmed nor denied it.

So is it or is it not racist to have a set of rules apply solely based on the color of someone's skin?

Edited January 11, 2010 by Booyah

[Ali G. 37]

Oh dear

There's no free speech until you can freely use every word without consequence.

What a quaint idea.

Simple question. Should it be acceptable for someone to be able to say something because they are of x color, yet having someone else of y color saying the exact same thing be racist?

[The_Dude 1,142]

When I saw the title, I thought "ohhh they let eric back". He's at least entertaining. But instead, it is the return of the VJ Hemorrhoid.

[Darnell 8,478]

Simple question. Should it be acceptable for someone to be able to say something because they are of x color, yet having someone else of y color saying the exact same thing be racist?

Ya, it's acceptable.

Even been talked about , in the x community.

Talked about so much, in fact, that the power of the word seems to have been dimished to all of those in the x community.

Except of course, when the y community mentions it.

I gotta say, you were the main reason I turned off images here - I got so innundated with the charts and graphs, I couldn't follow what the gist was, and gave up.

Nice to see ya back, though.

Any comments about the USA Census Form verbiage?

[Ali G. 37]

When I saw the title, I thought "ohhh they let eric back". He's at least entertaining. But instead, it is the return of the VJ Hemorrhoid.

Thanks mate. You reminded me that I need to fire up the ignore list again.

Edit: I should have met up with you while being in Malibu. Don't worry, I would have paid for your bus fare to my mates house.

Any comments about the USA Census Form verbiage?

Have not seen it.

Edited January 11, 2010 by Booyah

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Have not seen it.

http://www.mercurynews.com/valley/ci_14156729

[Ali G. 37]

http://www.mercurynews.com/valley/ci_14156729

What's wrong with it? They are appealing to my fellow Hispanics. It's acceptable to translate everything else in Latin-Spanish, so why should this be any different?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Simple question. Should it be acceptable for someone to be able to say something because they are of x color, yet having someone else of y color saying the exact same thing be racist?

It isn't "acceptable".

[SMOKE 1,426]

They are appealing to my fellow Hispanics.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

@ Eric?