ZQT Needs to be Banned

[one...two...tree 2,762]

ZQT has been trolling the boards now for a few years...always deliberately trying to pi$$ off other members, even Kez (God rest her soul)...and still ZQT continues without any consequences.

Now ZQT has finally made his/her own noose with this post in a thread started by a member who is upset that her brother, who is in the Army, is stuck in another state after a long deployment in Afghanistan and was hoping to have him home for Christmas.

Here's ZQT's post:

thread

Ahhhhhhhhhh there you have it, some one might have to break down and spend their own money for a ticket. So better to let the taxpayer foot the bill, typical soldier mentality I notice lately.

Enough with this nonsense! He/she/it needs to be banned!

Edited December 23, 2009 by Galt's gallstones

[Jenn! 918]

Agree with the sentiment, but tsk, tsk Steven, you know how VJ feels about public admonishment...

[SMOKE 1,426]

Agree with the sentiment, but tsk, tsk Steven, you know how VJ feels about public admonishment...

he wasn't speaking to the OP. but, agreeing w/ another poster that the brother should have just bought a ticket home himself. the OP also said the brother wanted to do so. but, couldn't get his deployment extended.

btw: isn't public admonishment a TOS violation?

[ValerieA 350]

I felt zqt was baiting with that comment, and isn't THAT a violation of TOS?

[SMOKE 1,426]

I felt zqt was baiting with that comment, and isn't THAT a violation of TOS?

thats it ban everyone in the OT.

[Ban Hammer 13,346]

i thought this was gonna be a poll?

[Nagishkaw 510]

Zqt is just another fine example of a pelican poster. Just ignore 'it'.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

btw: isn't public admonishment a TOS violation?

Oh come on, Mike. ZQT is a fvcking troll. You might have evidence that they are an actual member, but it doesn't matter....they choose to use their membership here to troll the boards all the time and that is a TOS violation. Stop defending this a$$hole just because you agree with his opinions most of the time. I don't know why trolling gets tolerated to the level that it does, except perhaps because it brings more traffic to the site.

[SMOKE 1,426]

Oh come on, Mike. ZQT is a fvcking troll. You might have evidence that they are an actual member, but it doesn't matter....they choose to use their membership here to troll the boards all the time and that is a TOS violation. Stop defending this a$$hole just because you agree with his opinions most of the time. I don't know why trolling gets tolerated to the level that it does, except perhaps because it brings more traffic to the site.

i'm not defending anyone. i just pointed out what you didn't mention. and like i said if we start banning people for baiting and trolling the OT forum would be empty....and yes your constant anti-GOP bashing for the sole purpose of upsetting people (and don't even try to deny it) w/ different views than yourself is baiting and trolling.

[The_Dude 1,142]

i'm not defending anyone. i just pointed out what you didn't mention. and like i said if we start banning people for baiting and trolling the OT forum would be empty....and yes your constant anti-GOP bashing for the sole purpose of upsetting people (and don't even try to deny it) w/ different views than yourself is baiting and trolling.

I hardly think posting news articles that point out the foibles of the GOP hardly can be classified as trolling. ZQT is a troll, and a rather uninformed one at that. I think his comments in that thread were over the top, but I don't know about banishment. I find his ignorance to be quite hillarious.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

i'm not defending anyone. i just pointed out what you didn't mention. and like i said if we start banning people for baiting and trolling the OT forum would be empty....and yes your constant anti-GOP bashing for the sole purpose of upsetting people (and don't even try to deny it) w/ different views than yourself is baiting and trolling.

That's utterly ridiculous. You are implying that what ZQT's trolling is no different from what most regulars do in OT and that's pure bullsh!t. I don't care about whatever political leanings or religious beliefs ZQT might or might not have. ZQT does what he/she does for the sole purpose of antagonizing members. He did it to Kez in the immigration boards...he's done it everywhere. More than likely, he didn't think very hard on his post putting down all our soldiers, but was trying turn the screw on another member. If you think his antics are no different than the bantering that happens among regulars in OT from time to time, then I don't know what else to tell you.

[mox 298]

Agree with the sentiment, but tsk, tsk Steven, you know how VJ feels about public admonishment...

Sweet Mary mother of Gawd Steven, do you have ANY EFFING IDEA of what kind of doody you've just brought down onto your precious little noggin?!?!?! YOU DIDN'T EVEN TRY TO OPEN A TICKET?!?!?!? This can only end badly. (DO NOT think re-opening a new thread will be funny and endearing because it WILL NOT be accepted in this jolly manner!!!!)

Ewokzilla in 3...2...

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Sweet Mary mother of Gawd Steven, do you have ANY EFFING IDEA of what kind of doody you've just brought down onto your precious little noggin?!?!?!

ZQT is not a human. They are a troll. The rules are different.

[SMOKE 1,426]

That's utterly ridiculous. You are implying that what ZQT's trolling is no different from what most regulars do in OT and that's pure bullsh!t. I don't care about whatever political leanings or religious beliefs ZQT might or might not have. ZQT does what he/she does for the sole purpose of antagonizing members. He did it to Kez in the immigration boards...he's done it everywhere. More than likely, he didn't think very hard on his post putting down all our soldiers, but was trying turn the screw on another member. If you think his antics are no different than the bantering that happens among regulars in OT from time to time, then I don't know what else to tell you.

steven posting 2-3 articles on a topic w/ a certain view point in a day or two days is looking for a debate, posting 5-15 a day is looking for a fight. if you don't understand that, i don't know what to tell you. other than you do the same thing daily.....don't look now steven but, your attempt to form a lynch mob to go after someone you dislike isn't working....lemme guess i'm really zqt now right?

[The_Dude 1,142]

steven posting 2-3 articles on a topic w/ a certain view point in a day or two days is looking for a debate, posting 5-15 a day is looking for a fight. if you don't understand that, i don't know what to tell you. other than you do the same thing daily.....don't look now steven but, your attempt to form a lynch mob to go after someone you dislike isn't working....lemme guess i'm really zqt now right?

So its the quantity of articles you post, not necissarily the content of them that discerns whether someone is picking a fight or not? Come on, simply posting an article is hardly provoking.