Jump to content
NickD

How about a blank page when you hit reply?

 Share

47 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

I like it the way it is now. If people are following the thread of conversation, there is no need to see more than the most recent quote IMO.

I have to agree with this. In many cases, if the thread is flowing and on topic, you don't necessarily need to quote anything.

Especially if all you're going to say is "I agree" or " :blink: "

24q38dy.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Vietnam
Timeline

Even with a 1 quote limit it is silly seeing ####### like this http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...=233875&hl= time and time again... it would be nice if rather than the OP Quoted it just said OP...

"Every one of us bears within himself the possibilty of all passions, all destinies of life in all its forms. Nothing human is foreign to us" - Edward G. Robinson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
Maybe you should poll the membership rather than letting a few people decide.

Single quotes are pretty standard on message boards AFAIK.

A decision was already made based upon the complaints of a few people. I don't think that a poll will really yield any useful information. Between the numerous sock puppet accounts that some people have, the results could easily be skewed.

I have to agree with this. In many cases, if the thread is flowing and on topic, you don't necessarily need to quote anything.

Especially if all you're going to say is "I agree" or " :blink: "

I agree that sometimes people take it too far with the quoting and simply press the reply button not thinking about the wall of text that they are putting up. But in many circumstances, without being able to include multiple quotes, it is hard to maintain the context of the conversation. If this really is about saving space and all that, then why not limit signature files? So many people have the huge pics and glittery timelines. It has the same effect, it eats up page space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Morocco
Timeline
A decision was already made based upon the complaints of a few people. I don't think that a poll will really yield any useful information. Between the numerous sock puppet accounts that some people have, the results could easily be skewed.

Better than changing it back just because a few people protest loudly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Better than changing it back just because a few people protest loudly.

I agree that old way was bad when some members weren't using their own discretion on how many quotes to keep in their reply, but the single quote is not a good alternative. Hopefully, there's another solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this really is about saving space and all that, then why not limit signature files? So many people have the huge pics and glittery timelines. It has the same effect, it eats up page space.

I agree with doing this also. I have the signatures turned off for this reason-so many of them are enormous. No need for that in my opinion-if you want to post a ton of pictures, post them on your profile page.

24q38dy.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Morocco
Timeline
Thats your opinion. I think the wrong decision was taking the action in the first place.

That's my opinion about what? Which action? I'm so confused! What are we talking about?

Seriously though, I agree it shouldn't have been changed so quickly without member feedback. Personally, I'm happy with the change. I don't understand why it would be hard to follow a conversation this way. It's so much cleaner. I still say a poll would be a good idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline
I have to agree with this. In many cases, if the thread is flowing and on topic, you don't necessarily need to quote anything.

Especially if all you're going to say is "I agree" or " :blink: "

I agree

K1: 01/15/2009 (mailed I-129F) - 06/23/2009 (visa received)

AOS: 08/08/2009 (mailed I-485, I-765, & I-131) - 10/29/2009 (received GC)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: Egypt
Timeline
:rolleyes:

Don't just open your mouth and prove yourself a fool....put it in writing.

It gets harder the more you know. Because the more you find out, the uglier everything seems.

kodasmall3.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I like the single quote thing, it stops people who have no clue what's going on joining in and creating chaos. This way, if you want to respond, you actually have to read the thread...ok, well, it doesn't exactly do that, but I do like it :thumbs::thumbs::thumbs:

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the single quote thing, it stops people who have no clue what's going on joining in and creating chaos. This way, if you want to respond, you actually have to read the thread...ok, well, it doesn't exactly do that, but I do like it :thumbs::thumbs::thumbs:

You mean you're actually supposed to read the thread before you start spouting off?? :whistle:

24q38dy.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
You mean you're actually supposed to read the thread before you start spouting off?? :whistle:
Well, the U.S. Congress doesn't have to read a bill before they vote to pass it, no man. :bonk:

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...