fisting makes schools safer

[justashooter 430]

http://biggovernment.com/2009/12/08/fistga...sen-conference/

Fistgate II: High School Students Given ‘Fisting Kits’ At Kevin Jennings’ 2001 GLSEN Conferenceby Jim Hoft

In March 2000 the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) organization of Massachusetts held its 10 Year Anniversary GLSEN/Boston conference at Tufts University. This conference was fully supported by the Massachusetts Department of Education, the Safe Schools Program, the Governor’s Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth, and some of the presenters even received federal money. During the 2000 conference, workshop leaders led a “youth only, ages 14-21″ session that offered lessons in “fisting” a dangerous sexual practice. During another workshop an activist asked 14 year-old students, “Spit or swallow?… Is it rude?” The unbelievable audio clip is posted here. Barack Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar” Kevin Jennings is the founder of GLSEN. He was paid $273,573.96 as its executive director in 2007. Jennings was the keynote speaker at the 2000 GLSEN conference. ( continued in link)

[Ban Hammer 13,334]

maybe it's safer because afterwards no one can walk

[Peikko 1,575]

The things you believe shooter, incredible. Them homosexuals are all out to get you, you better watch out or they'll be rodding you while you sleep and all sanctioned by the great Obamo!

[JVKn'CVO 11]

And private school for our son it is...

Saludos,

Caro

[Nagishkaw 510]

Fisting Kits

:o :o

[SMOKE 1,426]

The things you believe shooter cleo, incredible.

the safe school czar promoting & handing out kits for fisting to kids is okay.

[Peikko 1,575]

The things you believe shooter cleo, incredible.

the safe school czar promoting & handing out kits for fisting to kids is okay.

I don't believe that there is a group of homosexuals who are trying to 'homosexualize' the nation which is essentially what drives this kind of drivel.

As for handing out kits for particular sexual practices, if that were true it would be wrong in a school environment no matter what one's sexual preferences are so no, it's not 'okay'.

[SMOKE 1,426]

The things you believe shooter cleo, incredible.

the safe school czar promoting & handing out kits for fisting to kids is okay.

I don't believe that there is a group of homosexuals who are trying to 'homosexualize' the nation which is essentially what drives this kind of drivel.

As for handing out kits for particular sexual practices, if that were true it would be wrong in a school environment no matter what one's sexual preferences are so no, it's not 'okay'.

so, the safe school czar promoting & handing out kits for fisting to kids is okay as long as its not in a school enviroment. again

[Peikko 1,575]

The things you believe shooter cleo, incredible.

the safe school czar promoting & handing out kits for fisting to kids is okay.

I don't believe that there is a group of homosexuals who are trying to 'homosexualize' the nation which is essentially what drives this kind of drivel.

As for handing out kits for particular sexual practices, if that were true it would be wrong in a school environment no matter what one's sexual preferences are so no, it's not 'okay'.

so, the safe school czar promoting & handing out kits for fisting to kids is okay as long as its not in a school enviroment. again

If you believe that's what I said, more power to you.

[SMOKE 1,426]

If you believe that's what I said, more power to you.

its what you wrote. i did see where you said it was wrong other than in a school enviroment.

[Peikko 1,575]

If you believe that's what I said, more power to you.

its what you wrote. i did see where you said it was wrong other than in a school enviroment.

No Smoke it really isn't what I wrote, you are projecting.

I am surprised you don't see the inherent flaws in these type of articles, they are not that hard to spot.

[SMOKE 1,426]

If you believe that's what I said, more power to you.

its what you wrote. i did see where you said it was wrong other than in a school enviroment.

No Smoke it really isn't what I wrote, you are projecting.

I am surprised you don't see the inherent flaws in these type of articles, they are not that hard to spot.

ok if you say so

As for handing out kits for particular sexual practices, if that were true it would be wrong in a school environment no matter what one's sexual preferences are so no, it's not 'okay'.

[Peikko 1,575]

If you believe that's what I said, more power to you.

its what you wrote. i did see where you said it was wrong other than in a school enviroment.

No Smoke it really isn't what I wrote, you are projecting.

I am surprised you don't see the inherent flaws in these type of articles, they are not that hard to spot.

ok if you say so

As for handing out kits for particular sexual practices, if that were true it would be wrong in a school environment no matter what one's sexual preferences are so no, it's not 'okay'.

Smoke, try again. I said handing out kits for particular sexual practices would be wrong in a school environment. You think I said handing out kits to kids for particular sexual practices, but I didn't. Again, you are projecting, I suspect because you have some desire to get 'one over' on me or something equally silly.

[SMOKE 1,426]

If you believe that's what I said, more power to you.

its what you wrote. i did see where you said it was wrong other than in a school enviroment.

No Smoke it really isn't what I wrote, you are projecting.

I am surprised you don't see the inherent flaws in these type of articles, they are not that hard to spot.

ok if you say so

As for handing out kits for particular sexual practices, if that were true it would be wrong in a school environment no matter what one's sexual preferences are so no, it's not 'okay'.

Smoke, try again. I said handing out kits for particular sexual practices would be wrong in a school environment. You think I said handing out kits to kids for particular sexual practices, but I didn't. Again, you are projecting, I suspect because you have some desire to get 'one over' on me or something equally silly.

nope thats all i think you said. someone else is projecting. & no i desire nothing that includes you.

[Peikko 1,575]

If you believe that's what I said, more power to you.

its what you wrote. i did see where you said it was wrong other than in a school enviroment.

No Smoke it really isn't what I wrote, you are projecting.

I am surprised you don't see the inherent flaws in these type of articles, they are not that hard to spot.

ok if you say so

As for handing out kits for particular sexual practices, if that were true it would be wrong in a school environment no matter what one's sexual preferences are so no, it's not 'okay'.

Smoke, try again. I said handing out kits for particular sexual practices would be wrong in a school environment. You think I said handing out kits to kids for particular sexual practices, but I didn't. Again, you are projecting, I suspect because you have some desire to get 'one over' on me or something equally silly.

nope thats all i think you said. someone else is projecting. & no i desire nothing that includes you.

Now you are just being stupid and colouring things red doesn't make you somehow right. What's so difficult about this? Handing out a kit in a school that promotes any type of sexual practice is wrong. That's really a very clear statement. Your response was:

so, the safe school czar promoting & handing out kits for fisting to kids is okay as long as its not in a school enviroment. again (the clear implication that this is my opinion)

That's a projection. No way around it Smoke.

Edited December 11, 2009 by Madame Cleo