Jump to content

116 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
And you're so perfect huh?
Pot. Kettle. Black.

As has been stated before, some posters have their noses so high in the air that if they walked outside in the rain, they'd drown. Good to see that some here are so blunt about calling such people out when it's deserved, si man.

From the information that the OP presented, I too consider it a stretch to conclude actual "abuse."

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted

They both need married counseling or some time to adjust...I had been in this situation before and now we've been through and get along very well unlike it used to be but it took us four years to finally realize our mistakes, incompatibilities, and accepted each other. We almost got divorced a month after our marriage, but it was me who stopped it at first and I endure a lot of patience, heartaches, etc.....

Posted (edited)

I think anyone reading the VJ boards for longer than a month understands that not all older US man/younger Asian woman marriages are based on love, much less mutual love. Provided both parties have the sense to negotiate the terms, are happy to enter into this agreement and willing to stick to it rather than scarpering at the first sign of "cultural differences" or any other "convenient" excuse to cut and run, then I see no harm and no foul; provided there is integrity on both sides.

From what I've read, there are many couples in this situation who are very comfortably, or happily, married.

Love doesn't make a successful relationship, any more than the lack of it fails to make one. What makes it work is commitment, dedication and mutual respect. If your relationship doesn't have those qualities, then it isn't going to work in the long term, period.

The OP asked a question, and was given the most relevant answers early on:-

Cannot stay here unless you adjust status with the man you chose to come here to marry. If the situation is untenable, go home - otherwise, buck up and fix your relationship and stay.

Edited by Brit Abroad

ROC

AR11 filed: 02/05/11

I-751 filed at Vermont Service Center: 02/07/11

NOA: 02/14/11

Biometrics appt: 03/21/11

RoC Interview: Not required

RoC Approved: 08/04/2011

10 yr Green card received: 08/10/2011

Filed: Timeline
Posted
Pot. Kettle. Black.

As has been stated before, some posters have their noses so high in the air that if they walked outside in the rain, they'd drown. Good to see that some here are so blunt about calling such people out when it's deserved, si man.

From the information that the OP presented, I too consider it a stretch to conclude actual "abuse."

:thumbs:

Posted

Exactly, they talked like they know the whole story of marriage....But to be honest, there's nothing good staying in US nowadays unlike it used to be as what plenty of immigrants said because of extremely terrible economy. Heck, I can find better job (office positions) back in Philippines than here in US and most citizens here talked like this country is full of gold, what a #######. I have an MBA now obtained here ,yet cant even land an office job, most jobs here available are dead end and people talked here like marrying USC is a piece of gold for the filipino, ######! I feel like I'm a slave living here than living my native country honestly.

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Thailand
Timeline
Posted
Exactly, they talked like they know the whole story of marriage....But to be honest, there's nothing good staying in US nowadays unlike it used to be as what plenty of immigrants said because of extremely terrible economy. Heck, I can find better job (office positions) back in Philippines than here in US and most citizens here talked like this country is full of gold, what a #######. I have an MBA now obtained here ,yet cant even land an office job, most jobs here available are dead end and people talked here like marrying USC is a piece of gold for the filipino, ######! I feel like I'm a slave living here than living my native country honestly.

I personally think it has always been this way. I lived in Asia for 3 years traveling to almost every country there and can honestly say I never met anyone that wanted to come to the US permanently. I met very few that even wanted to visit.

Service Center : Vermont Service Center

Consulate : Bangkok, Thailand

Marriage : 2006-11-08

I-130 Sent : 2008-02-22

I-130 NOA1 : 2008-03-10

I-129F Sent : 2008-04-08

I-129F NOA1 : 2008-04-14

I-129F touched: 2008-05-06

I-130 touched: 2008-05-09

I-129F approved 2008-09-05

I-130 approved 2008-09-05

NVC received 2008-09-12

Pay I-864 2008-10-08

Pay IV bill 2008-10-08

Receive Instruction 2008-11-05

Case Complete 2008-11-18

Medical 2009-01-19/20 passed

Receive Pkt 4 2009-01-30

Interview 221g 2009-02-23

Second interview 2009-03-02 Approved

POE DFW 2009-03-07

Received SS card 2009-03-17

Received GC 2009-04-01

Done for 3 years or 10 years. Haven't decided yet.

(I'm going for the IR-1 and blowing off the K-3. Even if it takes an extra couple months, it's worth it to not have to deal with USCIS again)

"Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

Note:

Please fill out I-130, wait 6 months for approval, then 3 more months for an interview. (Unless of course we've bombed your country into the stone age, then you qualify for expedited processing.)

Welcome to the USA!!!

Posted
I just wanted to shed a little light on the fact that it's not always the foreigner commiting fraud as is always the general conclusion on here, people on VJ always seem to jump to that conclusion when they read cases like this.. and immediately shout out "I smell fraud".

When I read the OP's post that's not what I immediately thought and as I've explained before, here's why.

Having travelled to Asia extensively and had first hand witnessed "the Old man and young Asian women" stereotype in such places as Pat Pong, Bangkok and lived in the Middle East long enough to have seen on the local news tons of cases of this phenomena turned horribly ugly, I have my (perhaps weighted and biased) opinion on this issue and just wanted to make people stop and think before they shout "fraud". Take into account the age difference, cultural difference and yes, where the foreigner is from DOES make a difference - the poverty level etc.

If a marriage does not work out, why is the foreigner always blamed for the breakdown?? why do people in general on here not Ever see the USC as at fault, but Always accuse the foreigner of marriage fraud? now that's biased ! I wonder what the statistics are of older USC males bringing young Asian mail order brides to the US, who's seeking out who here? If the guy is so faultless and wonderful and could possibly not be blamed for the breakdown of the marriage why did he have to go to a foreign place to find a wife? why not find someone that's already legally here? If he is into Asian women there are huge communities of Asian women here, already legal residents.

When these older men go to Asia and bring over Much younger girls to marry it stinks to the high heavens to me... why go to such extreme lengths? If they're so great why can't they find someone here - in the whole of the huge USA?? Does he REALLY think that this young beautiful girl, if she had a choice, REALLY want to sleep next to him every night ? Hell no, he knows she's doing it because she wants a better future for herself, her future kids and possibly her family back home, and yes of course love can grow out of this and this can be a wonderful relationship.

But I still know it's done with many compromises on the young girl's part - spending the best years of her life tending to an older man instead of marrying someone closer to her own age from her own culture and growing old together, enjoying her life instead of carrying this burden of having to seek out a better life for herself and her family etc. all compromises. Do you think the USC does not know this?? Of course he does!

In my opinion I think this is why he's gone to these extremes, because he is NOT perfect, there's something wrong with this guy, he feels the need to have a submissive partner whom he can "hold" something over in the hopes that she'll be obedient to him, never leave him and do whatever he asks of her - cook, clean and provide sex as much as he needs because he knows he has complete "power" over her life and destiny and she's completely dependant on him... see, if it was an ordinary USC she would not take this BS and walk out and he could do nothing about it, the foreign bride has too much to lose so she's forced to stay and the USC knows this.

The role of women has changed - All over the world. Some men just cannot handle that their wife is more succesful, independant, intelligent etc. than them, so they go "to the ends of the earth" to find a submissive wife - someone who depends on them for Everything in their lives.

I feel from what I have personally seen on my travels and living in amongst these communities, I have good reason tho have my biased opinion on this case: I believe this is what happened: the USC wanted a nice sweet submissive wife, who will stay at home, cook,clean and provide sex for him, in return he would take care of her basic needs and she would be happy with that because it is better than what she had back hom, but he had a nice surprise, this little girl was not gonna take his BS and resisted and so now of course he wants to get rid of her - not even wanting to buy her a ticket back home. I still say: Sick old ####### in my opinion!

No wonder the USCIS created the two year Conditional GC, it is to protect both parties! Not only the USC!

Your extreme opinions bring up ugly stereotypes and add NOTHING to the conversation. You keep repeating yourself with them, and this does nothing but trying to create a flame war, and these opinions get old and tiring just hearing them one time. We heard where you stand 3 post ago. Please give it a rest, sheesh!

Sign-on-a-church-af.jpgLogic-af.jpgwwiao.gif

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Her continuous repeation leads to self mastery, spending 99 percent of her skills on 1 percent of the topics. The only topic hovers around putting down USC white old men with their foreign Asian spouses.

Good Riddance. Enough of the shallow monotonous long diatribe.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
Good Riddance. Enough of the shallow monotonous long diatribe.
She imaginably has a large percentage of VJ posters on "ignore."

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...