Obama / Tiger Woods, the glaring similarity.

[Danno 1,228]

You lefties are so predictable.. it's well it's laughable.

This piece focusses on two americans, one a Black president and another American who claims he is not black.

Even though the

article clearly states this has nothing to do with RACE, color is all you see!

It's rather sad.

and of course it;s also shallow to use race to avoid discussing the merits of substance ... which has nothing to do with race.

TSK tsk tsk

Danno everyone is laughing at your ridiculous attempts to tear down Obama with nonsensical comparisons like this one. This isn't a "lefty" conspiracy; its calling a ####### a #######. Furthermore just because the author threw in a sentence that his article isn't about race doesn't make it true. How often have people made rascist remarks but prefaced them by saying "I'm not a racist, but....."??? It happens all the time. Personally I think it's more about sour grapes than race, but that's just my opinion.

PLease quote for me the part that is Racist, obviously I missed it.

[HAL 9000 96]

It wouldn't be the first time you miss something, even if it were to be reposted.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

avoid discussing the merits of substance

We'd be happy to discuss merits and substance if any of either were offered.

[nowhereman 1]

You lefties are so predictable.. it's well it's laughable.

This piece focusses on two americans, one a Black president and another American who claims he is not black.

Even though the

article clearly states this has nothing to do with RACE, color is all you see!

It's rather sad.

and of course it;s also shallow to use race to avoid discussing the merits of substance ... which has nothing to do with race.

TSK tsk tsk

Danno everyone is laughing at your ridiculous attempts to tear down Obama with nonsensical comparisons like this one. This isn't a "lefty" conspiracy; its calling a ####### a #######. Furthermore just because the author threw in a sentence that his article isn't about race doesn't make it true. How often have people made rascist remarks but prefaced them by saying "I'm not a racist, but....."??? It happens all the time. Personally I think it's more about sour grapes than race, but that's just my opinion.

PLease quote for me the part that is Racist, obviously I missed it.

You totally missed my point... I clearly said that the article is about sour grapes (race might be an underlying factor but its hard to say). However my other point is valid (you totally missed this one as well)... that throwing in a sentence that "this isn't about race" is meaningless. Readers will judge the merits of an article on its substance, not a one liner from the author.

[Danno 1,228]

So far, the race baiters have failed to produce.

[HAL 9000 96]

When the produce is sh!t, that would be accurate. But everyone here knows that YOU are the race baiter and likely a half-open closet racist, Danno. Just come out and say it.

[nowhereman 1]

So far, the race baiters have failed to produce.

The failures are the attempt of the author to discredit Obama (2 +2 = potato chips, right?) & your inability to comprehend the meaning of other poster's comments. Keep throwing out the Red Herrings... I know you have an endless supply of them B)

[Danno 1,228]

You lefties are so predictable.. it's well it's laughable.

This piece focusses on two americans, one a Black president and another American who claims he is not black.

Even though the

article clearly states this has nothing to do with RACE, color is all you see!

It's rather sad.

and of course it;s also shallow to use race to avoid discussing the merits of substance ... which has nothing to do with race.

TSK tsk tsk

Danno everyone is laughing at your ridiculous attempts to tear down Obama with nonsensical comparisons like this one. This isn't a "lefty" conspiracy; its calling a ####### a #######. Furthermore just because the author threw in a sentence that his article isn't about race doesn't make it true. How often have people made rascist remarks but prefaced them by saying "I'm not a racist, but....."??? It happens all the time. Personally I think it's more about sour grapes than race, but that's just my opinion.

PLease quote for me the part that is Racist, obviously I missed it.

You totally missed my point... I clearly said that the article is about sour grapes (race might be an underlying factor but its hard to say). However my other point is valid (you totally missed this one as well)... that throwing in a sentence that "this isn't about race" is meaningless. Readers will judge the merits of an article on its substance, not a one liner from the author.

I think you are mistaken, while it's true I would never have voted FOR Obama, of all the people running (including McCain) I liked Obama the best and John Edwards the least.

so I have no "sour grapes"..... I just oppose much of what Obama has done (though not all).

If I have "sour grapes" about anything in this last election cycle, it would be the Media who put more investigative reporting on PAlin than they did on Obama.

Edited December 8, 2009 by Danno

[nowhereman 1]

When the produce is sh!t, that would be accurate. But everyone here knows that YOU are the race baiter and likely a half-open closet racist, Danno. Just come out and say it.

Danno is a bigot, not a racist (although its a slippery slope).

[HAL 9000 96]

When the produce is sh!t, that would be accurate. But everyone here knows that YOU are the race baiter and likely a half-open closet racist, Danno. Just come out and say it.

Danno is a bigot, not a racist (although its a slippery slope).

For all intensive purposes, ssdd.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

So far, the race baiters have failed to produce.

As have those that claim merit and substance.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

This is a horribly written article with an incredibly tenuous metaphor attached to it.

Of course comparing Tiger Woods to Obama has nothing whatsoever to do with race. Give me a fvcking break.

[Danno 1,228]

When the produce is sh!t, that would be accurate. But everyone here knows that YOU are the race baiter and likely a half-open closet racist, Danno. Just come out and say it.

Danno is a bigot, not a racist (although its a slippery slope).

For all intensive purposes, ssdd.

And you're a D_ckHEad for all practical purposes HAL.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Posting an article of this low quality and expecting a "legitimate debate" about it isn't exactly the sign of a mental giant

[HAL 9000 96]

When the produce is sh!t, that would be accurate. But everyone here knows that YOU are the race baiter and likely a half-open closet racist, Danno. Just come out and say it.

Danno is a bigot, not a racist (although its a slippery slope).

For all intensive purposes, ssdd.

And you're a D_ckHEad for all practical purposes HAL.

Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww... Danno's getting more upset.

Keep posting obvious bullsh!t for all to see.